Read the full article on Firstpost, here: https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/from-my-own-private-idaho-to-four-days-in-france-a-look-at-the-factors-that-define-lgbtqi-cinema-4590621.html
On June 29, 1969, the New York Daily News, like many other newspapers, wrote about a “predawn police raid on a reputed Greenwich Village homosexual hangout, the second raid within a week, [which] touched off a two-hour melee yesterday as customers and villagers swarmed over the plainclothes cops.” This came to be known as the Stonewall riots, after the name of the “homosexual hangout,” and the event was, as Time called it, “the spark that ignited the modern gay rights movement in the United States.” Subsequently, June has come to be celebrated as Pride Month, and two films, both named Stonewall, are based on this event. The first, released in 1995, was directed by the British filmmaker, Nigel Finch. The second, released in 2015, was by Roland Emmerich.
There are, of course, many filmmakers who are homosexual, but it’s interesting to explore whether this “gayness” manifests itself in the films they make, and what really makes for a “gay film.” Is there a particular gay sensibility that’s manifest, even if the material is hetero-normative? Is it that the film has a gay protagonist, or is about LGBTQI issues? Finch and Emmerich, themselves, are two very different kinds of “gay filmmakers.” The latter is known for “macho” blockbusters like Independence Day and Godzilla, while Finch’s most recognised film may be The Lost Language of Cranes, a TV-movie version of (gay author) David Leavitt’s sensitive novel about a gay man and his family dynamics. (Sample line: “The longing to touch and be touched by another man [was] beginning again its plaintive wail inside of him…”)
Continued at the link above.
Copyright ©2018 Firstpost.
ini
June 25, 2018
Thanks for the piece. I never would have guessed that I would one day read you mention grindr!
Anyway, I very much agree with your definition of what queer cinema is. A filmmaker’s sexuality obviously does not necessarily translate, but the sensibility he or she shows in the movie could very well warrant that label. Lee in ‘Brokeback Mountain’ and Kechiche in ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’ display such specific queer sensibility that any film of Emmerich or Singer can’t even hold a candle to. But then you also have queer filmmakers that uniquely and almost always display their queer sensibility regardless of the subject matter they are dealing with – Dolan, Almodovar, Demy, Johar. The specificity is very much sensibility-driven, yes.
But, the point you bring up about the ‘human or gay story’ can be hard to draw on. ‘Call Me by Your Name’, to me, is a human story. But what about the scenes where Elio feels triumphant after sex with Marzia vs. the hint of shame after sex with Oliver? This particular ‘guilt’ emotion is very specific to queer cinema.
What works for me is Ferreira’s explanation about queer cinema being an expression of freedom from heteronormative models. ‘Shortbus’ is queer cinema, ‘Carol’ and CMBYN is not. ‘Stranger by the Lake’ is, ‘Love, Simon’ is not!
I don’t know… I am still evolving on this I guess. But, again, thanks for bringing this up.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sutheesh Kumar
June 25, 2018
Welcome BR to the real malayalam cinema. I think this is your first sarcastic review for a malayalam film.
LikeLike
ini
June 26, 2018
And, what about queer cinema in India? Isn’t it time that at least the seemingly liberal filmmakers of repute (Ratnam? Kashyap? Bhardwaj? Vasudev Menon? Akhtar?) tell some LGBT stories in the mainstream? I remember asking Ram, after having watched a transgender character with a heart of gold (yawn!) in Peranbu, about how easy is to resort to stereotypical LGBT characters for a plot convenience or for want of an agent to glorify the ‘noble’ virtues of the straight man/woman. His answer sounded as if he doesn’t seem to know what he is doing. Bless his heart!
LikeLike
Kay
June 26, 2018
Ini- It would take eons for Indian cinema to develop that kind of maturity. I would be happy to see a movie that has a normal LGBTQ character who’s not a villain or the butt of jokes.
LikeLike
Honest Raj
June 27, 2018
Ini: Ever heard of a film called Vettaiyadu Vilaiyadu?
LikeLike
Vivek narain
June 27, 2018
June, named after Juno deserves to be called month of pride, but for entirely different reason. Juno and Jupiter, brother and sister, husband and wife. Goddess of marriage, a marriage of convenience, Juno was neither hetero nor homo, but rather solosexual giving birth to Mars and so was Jupiter solo siring Minerva, both doing a solo job for their pride.
LikeLike
Sifter
June 27, 2018
Whitewashed Stonewall- I haven’t seen this, but looks like it deserves the scorn it gets. I have read reviews lambasting it as telling the story only from a predominantly Gay male angle.
We continue to want or expect ‘rebellious deviancy’ or its equivalent of ‘rebellious uniqueness’ from Non-Hetero cinema. This has given rise to some hilarious offerings being made and touted as the best ever made at the festivals and turns out to be utter duds upon viewing. What is wrong with expecting some ‘normalcy’ or ‘everyday’ happenings or characters from Non-Hetero cinema? To me it is inherently rebellious when you figure out that you don’t have to resort to the expected rebelliousness or try hard to be cool to compensate for the way you are.
Brings to mind Viola di mare- The sea purple in English.
LikeLike
The Ghost Who Walks
June 27, 2018
@Ini
Isn’t it time that at least the seemingly liberal filmmakers of repute (Ratnam? Kashyap? Bhardwaj? Vasudev Menon? Akhtar?) tell some LGBT stories in the mainstream?
Why put the onus on these filmmakers?
The most ‘normal’ (for the universe the movie is set in) portrayal of gay characters in Tamil mainstream cinema that i have seen was from Goa directed by Venkat Prabhu. Perhaps there are more that didn’t get the limelight they deserve?
LikeLiked by 1 person
ini
June 27, 2018
@Honest Raj, hahaha. Don’t even get me started on that movie. A homosexual couple raping and murdering women! Not in front of my salad 😀
LikeLike
ini
June 27, 2018
@Kay, ya, no! That is the resigned attitude I am afraid of. If one is showing off how liberal and sex-positive they are by telling stories about a live-in couple/pre-marital pregnancy/masturbation jokes, etc., what is stopping one? I find it hard how one can be ‘selectively’ progressive. Anyway, I guess I am living in my own liberal bubble.
I also understand that they don’t owe us these stories, but can they at least stop resorting to them for convenience, or worse, crude humor? I am willing to wait years, but please tell me that they are at least putting in an effort to listen and understand.
LikeLike
Rahul
June 27, 2018
Ini and Kay
Do check out Loev
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loev_(film)
Its a really good movie.
LikeLike
Srinivas R
June 27, 2018
Ini, Honest Raj, the worst part about VV was that the gay angle seemed to be added just so that Raghavan can mouth some macho homophobic comment. It came out of nowhere and added nothing to the movie. Seemed inspired by some serial killer articles that appeared on Junior Vikatan two decades back.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
June 27, 2018
I think, at least in Hindi, we have begun to mainstream gays and lesbians.
LikeLike