Spoilers ahead…
When Rajkumar Hirani announced Sanju, it sounded like a breakaway. He makes movies about outsiders. If Munna Bhai was an outsider to the establishment, one of the 3 idiots was an outsider to the rote-learning rat race, and then we got a film about the ultimate outsider: an alien. I wondered how Hirani would handle the story of a cosseted industry insider — but it turns out the Sanju of Sanju is an outsider, too, a square peg in a round hole. He doesn’t fit his father’s expectations, his girlfriend’s dreams, and he doesn’t live up to his best friend’s friendship and his countrymen’s expectations of a patriotic citizen. The difference is that Hirani’s other outsiders were forced into the situations they found themselves in (say, due to being left behind on earth), whereas everything Sanju did, he chose to do. The hope, therefore, was that the film would provide the why-s behind Sanjay Dutt’s actions. So many boys have domineering fathers and mothers who die early. They don’t end up snorting coke. So many Mumbai-ites received threats after the 1993 bomb blasts. They didn’t buy arms from the underworld. Was Sanju an emotional fool? Was he weak of will? Or was he someone who was programmed to flirt with fire? What makes this poor little rich boy so special, so different that we empathise with his lapses into behaviours we’d not so easily overlook in others?
That should have been Sanju. That’s what Sanju isn’t. It’s usually not the audience’s business what the writer puts into a biopic, and what he leaves out. (Or writers in this case, Hirani and his regular partner-in-crime, Abhijat Joshi.) That’s why the same life can come in many versions. Richard Attenborough’s Gandhi chose to look at the Mahatma through a reverential lens, while Feroz Abbas Khan’s Gandhi, My Father cut Bapu down to size as someone so obsessed with his role of father of the nation that he forgot to be a father to his son. Sanju doesn’t shy away from its protagonist’s bad choices. Manyata Dutt, played by Dia Mirza, calls her husband “the king of bad choices.” But a choice means that more than one option or scenario exists. The film concedes that Sanjay Dutt procured assault rifles from the underworld, but strictly for “self defence.” (It’s a bit like buying a T-Rex because your two-year-old wanted a pet.) If this was the “bad choice,” what were the other options/scenarios? Was Dutt aware of them? Did he weigh them in his mind, wrestle with them at night? Or did he just take the easiest way out? Without this journalistic line of inquiry, how do we begin to understand Sanju?
The problem with Sanju isn’t its conviction that Sanjay Dutt was not a terrorist, and that the media is largely responsible for this perception (though this point is harped on endlessly, as though to suggest Sanju would not have suffered if the newspapers had been more responsible). The problem is that it doesn’t think it’s important to build a watertight case to convince us that this was indeed so. And I don’t think this is a huge ask from a filmmaker who, in his greatest film, convinced us that Sanjay Dutt and Mahatma Gandhi could co-exist in the same space. I have no doubt Hirani believes what he’s saying, but for those of us looking for some insight into Sanjay Dutt, beyond what’s been reported over the years, there’s practically nothing. Hirani has said, in interviews, that he heard these great stories from Sanjay Dutt, and was so fascinated that he had to make a movie about it all. The opening scene of Sanju literally mirrors this decision. We see Sanju (Ranbir Kapoor) staring into a mirror, and promising the story of his life. His biographer (and stand-in for Hirani), Winnie Diaz (Anushka Sharma), eventually becomes that mirror, reflecting back everything almost unquestioningly. She’s a bit of a sceptic at first, but Sanju asks her to give him an hour, and if his story isn’t the greatest tale ever told, then she can walk away. Of course, she doesn’t.
Occasionally, someone pops in with some damning news about Sanju, and Winnie’s blue eyes open wide in disbelief — and she sets out to unearth the truth. (Any halfway decent biographer would already know most of this, from preliminary research.) Otherwise, this is probably the easiest bio ever written, based on one man’s narration. To millennials, Sanjay Dutt’s story may be new, but the rest of us know it all. We know about Nargis Dutt and her last days, which fell like a pall over the production of Rocky. We know about the Bombay blasts, and Sanjay Dutt’s numerous trips to jail. What could have made these events interesting is the psychology — the why — but Hirani, one of our sunniest filmmakers, either doesn’t want to go there or is incapable of going there.
The why-s of other characters are equally bewildering. An endearing, affecting Vicky Kaushal plays Kamlesh, Sanjay Dutt’s BFF (and this film’s Circuit), and when Sanju sleeps with his girlfriend, he gets mad the way we’d get mad if a roommate finished off the bar of chocolate you’d kept in the fridge. This stretch is icky for many reasons. The girl in question is presented as a Madonna/whore — she’s sweet and simple when attired in a salwar kameez, but when she slips into lingerie, she strikes a seductive pose before Sanjay, despite knowing Kamlesh isn’t in the room. Hirani doesn’t seem to realise this is a problematic situation. Sanju may have laughed about his conquests (some 350, we are told), but surely a biographer must wonder what made him this way! Like drugs, was this an escape? Given that his father treated him like a little boy, did these conquests make him feel more of a man? Did he sleep around even when married to others? But to Hirani, this is simply material for a laugh. And he knows his audience. In the theatre I was in, they laughed too.
But then, it’s probably futile to expect why-s from Hirani. Why is psychology; Hirani is more interested in event and entertainment. He transforms a feel-bad life into a feel-good story. Imagine comparing Sanjay Dutt to Mahatma Gandhi: both carried weapons (a lathi, an AK-56) but never used it. This insight comes from a fawning biographer, someone hired before Winnie, and is dismissed by an appalled Sanjay Dutt — but the comparison is still out there, couched in poke-in-the-ribs humour, and it colours the rest of the film. Someone should tell Hirani that just because you can make a joke about everything, doesn’t mean you should. If he were a provocative stand-up comedian, then this would not be an issue. But when you’re tackling the life of a complex individual, then these laughs feel horribly out of place. It’s one thing to use humour to sugar-coat bitter-pill issues like the education system or fake godmen, and quite another to use it to amp up the adorability quotient of a man some of us are still conflicted about.
But there’s no denying that Hirani’s audience-pleasing instincts may be the best in the country. When his jokes work, they land amazingly. At many places, I laughed out loud — say, when Sunil Dutt, at the shooting spot of Rocky, demonstrates lip-syncing, and this joke segues, smoothly and organically, to another one built around Gabbar Singh. And there’s a glorious scene around a gangster played by Sayaji Shinde, one that locates humour in life-or-death situation. In other words, if a “Hirani-esque entertainment” is what you seek, then you probably won’t complain. His tried-and-tested tricks, fine-tuned over a series of blockbusters, are all in here. The background score dictates our emotions. When a drug peddler (an amusing Jim Sarbh, with a lisp) tempts Sanjay Dutt with coke, the score says “something really bad is happening here,” and later, when Sanjay Dutt is taken away by the police, the score says “something really sad is happening here.” You’ll also find Hirani’s Gujarati/Parsi caricatures, his simplistic emotionalism (using songs like “Na moonh chhupa ke jiyo” to bridge major character arcs”), and, of course, his trademark catchphrase. After “jadoo ki jhappi” and “all is well,” we get “question mark.”
These “tricks” help us navigate a film without much else. The entire first half is devoted to scenes with Nargis (Manisha Koirala), and Sanjay Dutt’s drug use and rehab. That’s a long time for stretches that say little more than “Nargis was a good mother” and “drugs are hell.” Scenes go on and on, like one where Sanju barges into his girlfriend’s (Sonam Kapoor, as Ruby) house at night, so he can raid her father’s liquor cabinet. Ruby gets one of the few really affecting scenes when she leaves Sanju for good. But what happened the next day? Did Sanju even care she was gone? Was there a bit of heartbreak? Was that what led to the womanising? Oh sorry, wrong movie. I didn’t buy Paresh Rawal as Sunil Dutt (he seems to be playing… Paresh Rawal), but he, too, pumps genuine emotion into the film. Given his plight (a cancer-stricken wife, two daughters to raise, a brattish son who keeps getting into trouble), I felt I wouldn’t have minded a biopic called Sunil. Kamlesh gets it right when he tells Sanju, “Tere se zyada tera baap jhel raha hai.”
I missed the movies Sanjay Dutt was part of — Sanju makes it appear as though there was Rocky, and then we got a Khalnayak poster, and then, Munna Bhai MBBS. What about the milestone films that were being made alongside these other episodes of the star’s life: Naam and Saajan, Sadak and Vaastav? It would have been fun to see Ranbir mimicking Sanjay Dutt in a recreation of, say, Mera dil bhi kitna paagal hai. But Ranbir’s performance goes beyond mimicry. He doesn’t make the sorrows sing like he did in Rockstar because the broad-beats writing doesn’t give the actors much to work off of. (Sample moment: at first, Sunil Dutt is called “terrorist ka baap,” and later, “Munna Bhai ka baap.” Cue, misty eyes.) But perhaps this is a much more difficult kind of acting: making people invest in your emotional state even when the script isn’t giving you much of a “before” or “after.” Cinematographer Ravi Varman attempts to provide at least a little texture — like in the drugged-out scenes where Ranbir is bathed in harsh lights and deep shadows. But when the film rolls to a full stop, the real Sanju is still a… question mark.
Copyright ©2018 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
sanjana
July 2, 2018
Your review is apt. With lots of question marks.
LikeLike
vigneshriyer
July 2, 2018
“Someone should tell Hirani that just because you can make a joke about everything, it doesn’t mean you should” – this statement perfectly reflects that Kamli’s bae scene. I totally second this review, Sanju doesn’t dwell deep and answer the various question mark. Somehow, I didn’t find the soul of the film much intriguing compared to earlier Hirani works ( for me, it didn’t work in PK as well ).
One of the troll summarised this movie for me which was synonymous with Tide advertisement.. Sanjay Dutt (shirt) gets whitewashed partially by Tide.. and the white portion is the output that we saw Sanju.
Rating – 2.5/5
LikeLiked by 1 person
Victor Summers
July 2, 2018
It seemed like Hirani conveniently prepared a narrative to stick to his formula of filmmaking, even at the expense of not fleshing out the characters well. While I was watching the movie I kept scoffing every time I’d notice these Hirani tropes- the catchphrase, the quips on absurdism in society, the double-meaning joke, the dramatic final twist etc.
LikeLike
Devarsi Ghosh
July 2, 2018
Ravi Varman’s lighting (introduced to it since Barfi) has been pretty one-note and… dare I say, annoying. Barfi, Ram Leela, KV, Tamasha, Jagga Jasoos and this.. all have this strange bright lighting (reminds of some of Janusz Kaminski’s work with SG, and Robert Richardson’s stuff). I am sure you have noticed, BR.
Also, the film made me cringe from first scene to the last. Even when I got sucked in to the emotion in certain scenes (Kamlesh telling Sunil to fix his son, father-son speech/letter moment), the scene just had to immediately cut to manipulative shot like Anushka’s one-eyed tear, and I started cringing again. Hirani’s filmmaking decisions to cute-ify difficult/screwed up moments was just uncomfortable to watch: one that sticks out is Sanju destroying the 10 rupee note which means so much to Boman’s character, and we get this weird Mickey Mouse music.
And yes, totally agree. I walked out thinking what a biopic a ‘Sunil’ could have been.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Tambi Dude
July 2, 2018
You mean complex life of a convicted criminal whitewashed in the movie.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Piyush Pratik
July 2, 2018
@DevarsiGhosh: I totally agree with you regarding the lighting.That bright yellow-orange light is present in scenes where he takes us to an earlier era. And yes, apart from Ramleela perhaps, I have found the same in Barfi! , Tamasha, KV,Jagga Jasoos,and all his recent films.
LikeLike
Vikram S
July 2, 2018
Hi BR, from what I can understand, my worst apprehensions about this director making this film seem to have come true…he must have turned everything into a cutesy moment with whimsical BG.. on another note, how would you compare Sanju with the Savitri biopic ( you had said there- great star, middling biopic)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vivek narain
July 2, 2018
Never liked the junkie or his base father. Don’t dig for Guru dutt, but the way he was bullied was vile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
July 2, 2018
Perhaps Sanjay Dutt and Mahatma Gandhi may occupy the same space but who would have thought that Rajkumar Hirani and Leni Riefenstahl would. Sanju is the most well designed, well shot propaganda movie since triumph of will. Here i was thinking of Sanjay Dutt as this privileged bad boy star son who squandered his life in drink, drugs and gangsters, but by the end of Sanju , i was weeping tears of blood for this gold hearted kismat ka maara, betrayed by the circumstances, by friends, by everyone around him, God, i found myself unfit to even take his name
Now nobody expects a raging Bull kind of treatment of the lead character by Hirani, even though Dutt’s life certainly would be the perfect subject for that – the opening scene where an overweight middle aged Sanju is talking to himself in the mirror echoes the beginning of Raging bull- But please dont feed us this Walt Disney cartoon hero meets Salim Javed masala hero version of the protagonist. the oedipal maa ka laadla at war with with the world, betrayed by circumstances, put down by his father, misunderstood by friends, the good son who chose 25 years of hell as opposed to leaving the country and settling abroad so that it does not besmirch the legacy of his father Sunil Dutt, portrayed as practically a walking talking God here.
Now fans of this film might ask, but isn’t all the negative aspects of his life portrayed here, the drugs, the womanising, the hobnobbing with gangsters, the undisciplined professional who reaches the sets late and hardly bothers to read the scripts, oh its all there, but the devil is in the framing of these details. the entire womanising aspect is played for laughs, the drugs, well that started out as a way to improve his acting – even though by the Dutt’s own admission, he had started taking drugs long before when he was in boarding school or something. but lets not bother about that – and worse he is fooled by his drug peddling best friend who tells him drugs are not unhealthy, while he himself gets high on glucose, hmm. the gangsters, well thats the only way actors could survive in bollywood, they have to be friendly to them or else they need Z security. as for his unprofessionalism, well its used by Hirani to score some brownie points for himself, munnabahai being the film that led to Sanju’s ultimate resurrection.
btw,if you don’t have a certain amount of familiarity with sanjay dutt’s life, it will be hard pressed to understand from the film that sanjay dutt was actually big movie star, his entire film career is sidelined throughout the duration of the film, popping out just about here and there. think of Raging Bull again without the boxing scenes. the only bit of movie trivia that stays with you after the film is over is not from any of Sanjay’s films, but from Bachchan’s Yaarana. We get to see just a single shade of the character in the entire film, someone should tell Hirani that giving ten different get ups for his lead actor does not equal ten different lives. the PR line -one man , many lives is as much a sham as the film
LikeLiked by 5 people
Srinivas R
July 2, 2018
I think this review sums it up well – https://thewire.in/film/sanjay-dutt-rajkumar-hirani-ranbir-kapoor-sanju-film-review
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anu Warrier
July 2, 2018
The film concedes that Sanjay Dutt procured assault rifles from the underworld, but strictly for “self defence.” (It’s a bit like buying a T-Rex because your two-year-old wanted a pet.)
My husband knows – well, knew – Sanjay Dutt. When this news first came out, he said, ‘That’s just the sort of stupid thing he would do!’ Dutt Junior wasn’t known for great intellect, and I think he was generally in a drugged out phase during the period. He really did think he was buying the guns ‘to protect his sisters’.
Sanjay did end up storing the guns for ‘friends’, but as my husband puts it, ‘Never attribute to treason what can be attributed to a lack of a single brain cell.’
I don’t know how Hirani picturised this in the film, but as Hamlet put it, ‘There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio…’ 🙂
LikeLiked by 6 people
Deepak
July 2, 2018
Great review.. most of the so called good critics like Masand seem to be afraid of criticizing these big directors so that they don’t go wrong in their reader’s mind or something. Raju Hirani’s film is simplistic enteratainment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aman
July 2, 2018
I think after watching Mahanti, Chaplin and reading your review of Sanju, it’ safe to conclude that no film that would be made taking a movie star as its subject would never be satisfactory. Any movie requires drama, and this drama is mostly from the personal lives and it’s nearly impossible to portray the process that a actor undergoes but perfect fodder for drama about the aftereffects of stardom. Even you yourself have mostly admired biopics made about unknown people than well knowns. This is because your knowledge, thoughts and feelings begin to intermingle with the viewing experience making it unsatisfactory. The length is also another factor, if it were a online series the length could be managed
LikeLike
MANK
July 2, 2018
Given that his father treated him like a little boy, did these conquests make him feel more of a man? Did he sleep around even when married to others? But to Hirani, this is simply material for a laugh
But he did not go into his marriages at all. there is just the relationship with ruby and then there is manyata. what about his 2 tempestuous marriages, where one ended in the death of his wife and the other in divorce. what about his relationship with his first daughter trishala. his rift with his sisters, his failed attempt at entering politics. how about his career high point from sadak saajan to khalnayak. what about Vaasatav, his great comeback and his greatest screen performance in a character that mirrors a lot of his own. all these most interesting aspects of his life are completely ignored
That’s a long time for stretches that say little more than “Nargis was a good mother” and “drugs are hell.” Scenes go on and on, like one where Sanju barges into his girlfriend’s (Sonam Kapoor, as Ruby) house at night, so he can raid her father’s liquor cabinet
i am really surprised at how successful the film has become. i didnt find it entertaining at all. a lot of the gags in the first half fall flat and as you said the scenes just go on and on. its just plain boring. the scenes where i really got into where the father son scenes. that were the only one that i connected in any way. some of them are unabashedly manipulative- like the letter reading scene , or the father and son bonding by singing na moonh chupa ke jiyo on a lonely street in the middle of night, but i was still moved by it, those scenes definitely showed Hirani’s commercial instincts. but beyond that, even if one forgives the whitewashing, this is cinematically and narrative wise, the worst film he has made.
And i am conflicted about Ranbir’s performance too. there are times it works brilliantly, but some times one does feel him going for Dutt’s more familiar mannerisms and body language than for the emotion. May be its the case of not having much to work with for the internalisng of the character there and the way he is directed
LikeLike
Aran
July 2, 2018
The story was a disappointment, as mentioned here by BR and others, but Ranbir’s acting was a nice surprise. He really did justice to whatever was asked of him, and more.
Yes, I would have liked to see behind the facade of the Sanjay Dutt that the audience already knows, but that wasn’t to be in this movie. The laughs and gags really cheapened the story. This was the first time I was actually disappointed by a Rajkumar Hirani film.
LikeLike
Ratish Ravindran
July 2, 2018
Kudos BR. Fantastic review. Appreciate you calling a spade a spade considering that the makers of the film are connected to Film companion.
I completely agree with your views on the film. This film like many other biopics made earlier (Azhar, Dhoni etc) ends up being a propaganda/reverential film which fails to unravel the enigma that Dutt Jr is. Dunno when we can see a honest biopic like Social Network or Raging Bull being made in India.
I loved Ranbir’s performance in the film. He redeems the film with a finely calibrated performance. Eagerly awaiting the release of “Thackeray” to see what another fine actor (Nawazuddin Siddiqui) does with the titular role in what seems to be yet another propaganda biopic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
July 2, 2018
Dutt Junior wasn’t known for great intellect, and I think he was generally in a drugged out phase during the period. He really did think he was buying the guns ‘to protect his sisters’.
Anu, about his intellect i agree, but this happened after his drugged out phase. he had already cleaned up his act and was at the height of his superstardom. so that doesn’t cut it. secondly he already had some 2 or 3 licensed guns in his possession, when he went an purchased the AK56, a fact that the movie also conveniently covers up, so why the hell did he do that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tambi Dude
July 2, 2018
@anu: “Dutt Junior wasn’t known for great intellect, ”
SD was a known Dyslexic case with severe problems in studies. Same with Abhishek. To that extent I sympathize with him.
LikeLike
awkshwayrd
July 2, 2018
“Hirani has said, in interviews, that he heard these great stories from Sanjay Dutt, and was so fascinated that he had to make a movie about it all. “
His interviews about those anecdotes related by Dutt made it seem like this would be something on par with “Wolf of Wall Street” – a tale of unbridled hedonism headed to the bottom of the barrel, but Hirani – and Abhijat Joshi – are not that kind of film-makers. They don’t do amoral excess.
The “why” of Dutt’s psychology would have been interesting, but looked unlikely given the heart-warming tone of the trailers. That would have been a much darker movie as well. It would have to hold Dutt accountable for his behavior.
The real criminal waste is Paresh Rawal as Sunil Dutt. He simply doesn’t appear to have tried to be Sunil Dutt, and that in a movie where Ranbir Kapoor is giving it his all. Perhaps Hirani didn’t care.
Roger Ebert used to say about a bunch of movies that they picked the wrong character to focus on, and I wonder if Hirani would have been better served making a biopic on Sunil Dutt. Now he was a Hirani-type character.
LikeLike
raghavan0418
July 2, 2018
Yet again, the opportunity for Ranbir Kapoor to play the sex-crazed drug addict whom we should feel sorry for.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Vidya Ramesh
July 2, 2018
The problem with making a biopic like Sanju is that everyone knows what happens in the beginning middle and the end. There is nothing new there, the story is in the how and the why. Hirani is not the go to guy for psycho analysis, so iam not really expecting the why..or maybe nobody including Sanjay Dutt himself really knows why he did the things he did. My problem with the movie was that even with the “how” things happened, the dramatic things like drug addiction or a tremendous movie success like munnabhai felt watered down. In a man who’s life had very high highs and rock bottom lows, the movie moments felt like they were on a plateau..not enough drama. For instance ever y one knows he had a drug problem including his dad but there is almost no drama or confrontation between them. A scene of them fighting wouldn’t have hurt. In a movie mostly about a father son relationship, how the father handles his sons addiction is glossed over.
PS i am looking forward to the timothee chalamet, Steve Carell movie a beautiful boy..now that I think will be a movie with a father son and drug addiction attempting to answer the whys.
LikeLike
Madan
July 2, 2018
Haven’t seen the film. But about Indian biopics tending towards propoganda, there was this serial that was briefly telecast on &TV called Meri Awaz Hi Pehchaan Hai about the Mangeshkar sisters (though it never named them). After covering their childhood and Dinanath’s struggles, just as they reached Mumbai and some juicy bits began to tumble out, the serial was yanked off air. This is why we can’t have a good thing. Because we are too thin skinned, too prone to deiifying mortals and too easily outraged. We have to accept that discussing the flaws of a famous person does not mean judging them, it just means acknowledging that they are human. And Sanjay Dutt was both flawed and human. And Markandey Katju thinks Sanju baba sets a great example through movies like Lage Raho.
LikeLiked by 1 person
omrocky786
July 2, 2018
A very good review Rangan Sir. I liked the movie while watching it, but reading your review I feel I should have not liked it. Just yesterday had an argument with a friend who called me a hypocrite for boycotting Raazi but watching and liking Sanju. I had no answer, I guess I have always liked Sanju Baba and Sallu Bhai so I am biased.
But Kudos to you Rangan – being part of FC and yet coming up with such a hard hitting review of Sanju.
Aside – IMO ,this is Ranbir Kapoor’s “Guru” Moment.
Aside 2- IMO – Dhadak to Sairat is, what Dayavaan was for Nayakan .( for the record Dayavan was not bad, but Nayakan was miles ahead of Dayavan )
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jaga_Jaga
July 2, 2018
A small note to Hirani:
Newspapers rampantly spread misinformation. Absolutely true sir, point taken! You portrayed that brilliantly in Sanju.
But what you conveniently did not convey is: Films also rampantly spread misinformation. Case-in-point: The movie Sanju!
Just like newspapers have this amazing weapon called a “question mark”, or phrases such as “it is rumored that”, “it is alleged that” etc. so do movies (especially the well-made ones) have this “cuteness aspect”, and making everything look gray such that nothing is black or white in this world.
Classic example of what I was taught in fourth grade, when you point a fingers at other, four fingers, point at you!
Smell hypocrisy/double standards, anyone?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jaga_Jaga
July 2, 2018
spell check in my last post:
wrong: when you point a fingers at other
right: when you point a finger at others
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
July 2, 2018
secondly he already had some 2 or 3 licensed guns in his possession, when he went an purchased the AK56, a fact that the movie also conveniently covers up, so why the hell did he do that.
Because that’s exactly the kind of stupid thing he would do, MANK. I guess you have to know him to understand how his mind works. From what my husband tells me (and we had this conversation when Dutt was first arrested), he is pretty child-like and would have been thrilled to be presented with an AK 56. ‘Great! Shiny new toy!’ ((BR’s analogy was very apt, actually),
Besides, he was extremely loyal to those he considered friends, so if they asked him to store stuff for them, he would, without a second thought as to the consequences. He’s a very gullible man – and according to S, was regularly taken advantage of.
Let me be clear I’m not talking about the film here. I’m talking about the real-life Sanju. And I’m NOT defending his bad choices either – others not so fortunate have been punished more severely for much less including that old woman who didn’t even know her house was being used to store ammunition. I just have a better idea of the man (from my husband and his friends who knew Sanjay back then) who made those blindingly bad choices, ones which any sane person would have known were incredibly stupid.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Asmita Prasad
July 2, 2018
I’m sorry, were you expecting bollywood to make an emotionally honest film that DIDN’T rely totally on clichés to rake in the moolah?? What have you benefit smoking, sir, and may I please have the number for your dealer?! 😁
LikeLike
An Jo
July 2, 2018
The biggest controversy, or the biggest hint that this film is a ‘white-wash’ for Sanjay Dutt would be Hirani’s over-drive in blaming the media for labeling Dutt an anti-national or/and a terrorist. For the last 30 minutes of the movie, Hirani literally goes into an over-drive talking of how the media treated Sanjay Dutt, and how the media IS WRONG. Sanjay Dutt from Yeravda hosts a la-Munnabhai talk-show, where he talks of the ‘masaledar’ news-shows and people passing judgements through small, ‘shouting-windows,’ where folks don’t understand the difference between a question-mark and a full-stop, and where, a certain guy from the media, just because he doesn’t get a picture from Dutt after he walks out from a jail, calls him a ‘terrorist’ to get his attention and a photo. To top it all, rather, to make it worse, Hirani has an item-song during the end-credits – I don’t remember Hirani having an end-credit item-song—with ‘white’ women of-course, trashing the media on walls, and well, calling the fourth-estate something that deserves to the dialogued on a potty-stand. After 140 minutes of better film-making, Hirani and Dutt and company decide to go on an over-drive blaming the media for not able to take a decision between a question-mark and a full-stop. And that is where people would – and rightly so – doubt Hirani’s credibility when it comes to portraying an ‘honest’ depiction of Sanjay Dutt! But then, if this is Sanjay Dutt’s ‘perspective’ and Hirani’s absorption after his late-night visits to Sanjay’s house, how can any viewer complain or diagnose?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Vishal
July 2, 2018
Is this the first-ever movie that discusses the Betteridge’s Law? Alas, they totally failed to give due credit (to the existence of such law).
A tear-jerker movie for sure. I cried the most when A R Rhaman’s beautiful composition was wasted on a situation so trite and unworthy.
I heard that Sunil Dutt’s role was first offered to Amir Khan, who (wisely) declined it. How did Hirani go from Amir to Rawal?! It’s like he went to a restaurant and asked for the most expensive wine in their cellar. And when he was told that they don’t have wine, he just decided to drink tap water instead.
LikeLike
omrocky786
July 2, 2018
Great points AnJo, loved it.
LikeLike
omrocky786
July 2, 2018
The five things , I feel should have been there in the movie-
1.The help extended as a father by Bala Sahab,
2.a brief mention of Trishala.
3.Support of Kumar Gaurav by re – launching him in Naam.
4.His feelings when he heard that so many people have died in the bomb blast because of his stupid mistake.
5.His entry into politics , canvassing for the SP in UP.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ravi K
July 2, 2018
Can’t wait for Hirani’s “Sallu,” which depicts Salman trying to feed the homeless man before running him over!
I’d love to see an Indian biopic take the “Last Days” or “Elephant” approach. More oblique storytelling, spanning a very short time, and while not technically about a specific person or incident, we all know what it’s referring to.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Salik
July 2, 2018
Rangan makes some important points. I had similar thoughts and wrote it down here.
View at Medium.com
LikeLiked by 1 person
Arjun
July 3, 2018
“He really did think he was buying the guns ‘to protect his sisters’.”
Quit the whitewashing, are you his lawyer or something? Just because your husband knew him many eons ago as a casual acquaintance doesn’t mean you have special powers to divine his intentions post-facto.
The only reason this man even got to see the light of day was because he is a celebrity who prominently portrays himself as a Hindu with a big tilak and all, so the public and courts are easy to forgive him. If he had been a common muslim, 1993 would have been the last we’d have heard of him.
LikeLiked by 4 people
omrocky786
July 3, 2018
Having read the unauthorized biography by Yaseer Usman , and the following PDF link, there is definitely a lot which has not been shown in the movie, but was that not expected . The film itself was pretty engrossing and entertaining.
LikeLike
Sami Qahar
July 3, 2018
Its not a biopic. Its a relationship drama at best. A biopic of this nature, along with other things you mentioned, cannot skip the life and role of Richa Sharma and his daughter Trishala. Richa herself died young when Sanju was going through trouble and he was not there for his daughter, who herself was going through weight and self esteem issues. Can you imagine the emotional drama that would have made? Oh sorry… Wrong movie.
LikeLike
Asmita Prasad
July 3, 2018
Sepia is the word you’re looking for.
LikeLike
Tambi Dude
July 3, 2018
Forget Sanju, tomorrow, 3rd Jul is the 20th anniversary of the finest bollywood movie ever made. I can talk about it even today more than this movie on a convicted criminal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sekhar
July 3, 2018
BR , After seeing your review i seriously doubt if Anupama chopra will let you be part of her channel (Film Companion south) 🙂 . Well written review.
LikeLike
sanjana
July 3, 2018
https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2018/07/02/sanju-a-dishonest-biopic-that-absolves-its-leading-man-of-all-responsibility_a_23472510/
LikeLike
Prasad
July 3, 2018
Sanju was throughly underwhelming. Looks like Hirani and Vinod choora took this movie to pay of some debt to Sanjay Dutt. Hirani’s movies always has moments which are cliches or sometime manipulative and convenient conicidences . But some how his himour sense convinces audience to overlook them . But boy, in Sanju many places it was so embarrassing and flat as that punch is not their in humour.
Now coming to biopics when can Indian filmmakers can make a biopic something like “Steve Jobs” . I thought Danny Boyle redefined the genre of biopic. Just show snapshot of some crucial moments in somebody’s life and also show how complex his situation or choices can be .
Any other biopic’s can anybody suggest? Why can’t we make films like this? Atleast in Tamil the best effort so far IMO is iruvar . Not sure if Guru can be clubbed in the same league .
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
July 3, 2018
I loathe the sensationalism and the aggressive journalism practiced by the contemporary media as anybody else, where everything is par for the course as long as it boosts the sales or TRPs. but the kind of bashing that the media gets in the sanjay dutt story is rather baffling. for one ,i think the press has been more than kind to sanjay Dutt throughout his period of crisis as opposed to several other stars and celebrities. in the early 90’s when the TADA scandal broke, the media was not as aggressive as today, not to mention there was no WWW or social media.he has always been portrayed as the emotional fool or the lovable rogue plagued by bad choices , rather than a hardened criminal . compare it with the way in today’s time , especially in the post Arnab goswami phase , how media pursues these stories,Dutt had it so much easy.
the only reason he suffered whatever jail term he did is only because he was booked under such a stringent law like TADA and the crime was terrorism, where no political party would dare support him beyond a point. so once the initial heat around his crime and subsequent arrest cooled down, the media and politicians weren’t loathe to support him
I have a feeling that after having done with the fields of medicine,education and religion, Hirani decided to focus on the media next and his own obsession with sanjay dutt , gave him the story that he needed to tackle this field. thats actually the biggest issue with the film. we are all for a strong and fervent critique of the media , but framing it within the sanajy dutt story is very very problematic
LikeLiked by 2 people
Veena
July 3, 2018
I am definitely in the minority here, but the movie did not across as whitewashing to me. It just reconfirmed my belief that SD is a “ bade baap ki bigdi hui aulad”. “What a complete unapologetic idiot” is what was going through my mind the whole time.
LikeLike
Vivek narain
July 3, 2018
What i can imagine is that probably SD was planning to use AK56 for some alternate use like Danny Kaye, who, when he worked for a dentist, used the surgeon’s drill to make holes on office woodwork.
LikeLike
sanjana
July 3, 2018
Lage raho sanjubhai!
LikeLike
Srinivas R
July 3, 2018
“Forget Sanju, tomorrow, 3rd Jul is the 20th anniversary of the finest bollywood movie ever made. I can talk about it even today more than this movie on a convicted criminal.” – Definitely worth writing and discussing about
LikeLike
brangan
July 3, 2018
“Yes. I wanted to do something with the underworld. But there was no story, no title. Once Rangeela was done, I was doing Daud with Sanjay Dutt. He knew a lot about the underworld, and because of his own problems with the whole thing, and—he would tell me about some instances when I’d meet him.”
https://www.filmcompanion.in/satya-crime-film-ram-gopal-varma-gang-war-gangster-manoj-bajpayee-underworld-daud-bhiku-mhatre-anurag-kashyap-underworld-sanjay-dutt/
LikeLike
sanjana
July 3, 2018
RGV has to rest on past laurels! His present is too bleak.
LikeLike
Rajesh
July 3, 2018
@ Sanjana “RGV has to rest on past laurels! His present is too bleak.” — 99.99% of artists become redundant after certain point of time. It doesn’t make their past achievements less relevant
LikeLiked by 2 people
sanjana
July 3, 2018
I did not say the film is not relevant. But he has become unless he comes up with something half decent.
LikeLike
Enigma
July 3, 2018
Celebrities/well connected individuals manage to stay out of prison, irrespective of their religion. Salman has managed to avoid going to jail. Sanjay Dutt got off lightly because of his late dad’s political connections.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bharathi Shevgoor
July 3, 2018
When it’s a Rajkumar Hirani movie there are certain expectations. None of them were realized.
It is not only that there were some scenes that were shockingly pedestrian, like the one where Kamlesh sobs in anguish outside the jail wall but also that they were plain icky like Kamlesh’s girlfriend’s seduction scene. Was this Hirani, I wondered. It seemed improbable, cheap and degrading.
It felt like an overly long film, yet no event seemed to have much of an impact on the audience other than some involving Dutt senior and Kamlesh. So many incidents that had depth were just glided over. Whitewashed and sanitised. In addition, there was a strange ‘ordinariness’, I’ve no other word for it, as if I was viewing an eighties’ film in its screenplay and impact.
I came back with the persona of Sunil Dutt predominant in my mind. It was his movie and Sanju Baba’s character left no impression. Even Sunil Dut, I thought, was painted in too broad strokes, that of an unbelievably resilient man. No sign of any trauma whatsoever.
While the movie did engage me as a viewer, it was not Hirani at all.
Happens, I suppose. The burden of expectations is every artiste’s cross.
LikeLike
kasthuri
July 3, 2018
i would have liked to know more about ranbir’s performance in the movie…is it as good as everyone is raving, is he the finest actor in hindi cinema today?
LikeLike
Srinivas R
July 3, 2018
“I have a feeling that after having done with the fields of medicine,education and religion, Hirani decided to focus on the media next ” – sounds a lot like that Bhandarkar guy no?
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
July 3, 2018
“But for all the entertainment he serves up, I seriously hope that, next time, he doesn’t take on the story of unfeeling banking officials made to see the error of their ways and cancelling all farming loans. It would be a terrible tragedy if Hirani ended up the Madhur Bhandarkar of the feel-good genre, saving the world one profession at a time.”
From my 3 Idiots review…
LikeLiked by 5 people
Srinivas R
July 3, 2018
Wow.. you are prescient BR
LikeLike
Sumesh
July 3, 2018
View at Medium.com
LikeLiked by 2 people
MANK
July 3, 2018
It felt like an overly long film, yet no event seemed to have much of an impact on the audience other than some involving Dutt senior and Kamlesh. So many incidents that had depth were just glided over. Whitewashed and sanitised
Absolutely, the entire first half was so bland. nothing touched me. it was in the second half a tleat there were the father son scenes that i connected with to some extend. which is why i am quite taken aback by the extend of the success of this film. i know the rest of the films are even so bad and after Race3 , audience would flock to anything remotely interesting. but its really Hirani’s star power working here (and the intrigue about the sanjay dutt story) , he is now to filmmakers what Aamir is to movie stars.his films are now events and its been 5 years since the last one. how i wish he had spend these years making something more substantial. i was skeptical when he announced the film, continued to be skeptical throughout the production and promotion and all my skepticism have come true. Sanjay Dutt is not the person about whom Hirani should have made a biopic, Sunil Dutt was a more perfect choice- the squeaky clean real life super hero who can do no wrong in life.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
July 3, 2018
Quit the whitewashing, are you his lawyer or something? Just because your husband knew him many eons ago as a casual acquaintance doesn’t mean you have special powers to divine his intentions post-facto.
Sigh. Neither do you? Or do you have a crystal ball?
I’m not whitewashing. Or defending the guy. I really couldn’t care less about him. I’m merely saying that people who knew him well back then weren’t surprised that he would do something so stupid for just the reason he stated. As Veena called him, ‘A complete unapologetic idiot!’ I would add ’emotional’ before ‘idiot’ as well. (‘Idiot’ being the operative word.)
And if you had actually read my comment and weren’t so interested in merely scoring a point, you would have noticed that I also said that he got away lightly compared to that poor 80+-year-old Muslim woman (and others) who had ammunition stored in their houses without even knowing what they were.
Show me one instance where I said that his stupidity excuses his crime?
LikeLike
sachita
July 3, 2018
“because you can make a joke about everything, doesn’t mean you should” wondering how bad it must have been for you to make this statement.
This is what I thought it would be when I read about raj kumar hirani making a movie on dutt. This is all very disturbing, Raj kumar hirani whitewashing sanjay dutt’s life, box office support, both laughing up all the way to the bank.
LikeLike
Devarsi Ghosh
July 3, 2018
The big question is: Why was this movie made? Rajkumar Hirani could’ve made anything, but why this? The public had pretty much moved on from the ‘terrorist’ tag it had once given to Dutt. It’s not like redeeming Dutt was an actual burning need of the time. And then, if at all Raju Hirani had to make a critique of tabloid journalism, he could’ve done it without making a Sanju.
So why? Hopefully, we will know one day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
An Jo
July 4, 2018
Another thing that stood out for me is the fact how Hirani talks of Dutt’s sisters. And by talks, I mean that he doesn’t let them talk at all!! They are just there as prop-ups: While everyone living in Bombay or who’s followed Dutt in his turbulent times knows that they stood behind him like rocks! Hirani shows them as mute spectators. And this again adds to doubting Hirani’s credibility and integrity and his actual ‘intent’ in trying make a movie with warts, et. al about a poor little rich star-kid. And it proves — in a way — that Hirani is completely going only by WHAT Sanjay Dutt talked to him about. His sisters didn’t turn up for his wedding with Manyata, they are not on good terms with her. So they get side-lined in the reel version too!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
July 4, 2018
Every second criminal can be given benefit of doubt like what a stupid person he or she is. Any unlawful activity is a result of stupidity or criminal intent. When that person is a star the judgment is always biased for and against. If it is a common criminal we are just not bothered.
It is best to leave the courts decide and it cant be helped if the public or media decides because everyone has a mind of her or his own.
Sanju may not be a hardened criminal but if we look at his choices and relationships some of us feel that he is not a good human being either. When decisions are taken it affects others and damages their lives even if the person is drugged. A drunk driver may drive recklessly and hurt other drivers and pedestrians. He maybe a good person but his drunken driving damages innocent people who come in his way.
LikeLiked by 3 people
brangan
July 4, 2018
sanjana: Exactly my problem with the film. I completely get that Hirani likes Sanjay Dutt as a person. But as a filmmaker, he should have some distance and not “cutify” such a man. I mean, amidst all the “poor little Sanju Baba” noises — victim of wrong company, victim of fate — there isn’t ONE scene where Sanju takes accountability and says, “No, I’m not a terrorist. But yes, I fucked up. Because of my actions, the life of several people has been irrevocably changed. I am sorry.”
Instead, it’s all blame the drug dealer, blame the gangsters, blame the media. With a whole bunch of cho-chweet scenes. And neither do we get an insight into the why, the psychology of such a person. That’s a problem.
It’s a measure of Hirani’s goodwill that the film gets away with smoking advice (use the left hand, not the right) and a problematic “have sex with your BFF’s girl” scene.
Had these scenes been in another “wholesome, family-friendly entertainer,” I think there would have been at least a bit of an outcry.
LikeLiked by 9 people
MANK
July 4, 2018
An Jo, not just his sisters, almost all the women in his life are ignored or sidelined and i think they are 3 major reasons for it
The relationship with women are the most problematic aspect of sanjay Dutt’s life. Right from Tina Munim, who was with him in Rocky and was supposedly his first girlfriend, to all other girlfriends, to his first wife, his second wife, his first daughter, his treatment of them has been horrible to put it mildly. even his relationship with Manyata was scandalous, his marriage to her when she still wasn’t divorced from her husband. the same goes for the sisters too. imagine turning against your sisters who stood by him in thick and thin the moment a new women enters his life. not to mention a downright disgusting sexist remark he made about Priya Dutt still using the Dutt surname. these aspects would have made him come across as a monster and should be eliminated as this wouldn’t have suited Hirani’s agenda
A lot of those women like Tina Munim are now so well off, she is now Tina Ambani and the last thing they need to be reminded today is How i slept with a drug junkie
This is the most important, Hirani’s limitation as a filmmaker in seriously dealing with female characters and man women relationships. his films are always about the infantile male with the heart who is a locked in a battle against a (cartoonish) older male with the head. and how the man child wins at the end. you could see that in the casting itself with middle aged guys like sanjay dutt and Aamir Khan playing college kids. even in Sanju, the only female character who is accorded some respect is Nargis, the most ‘harmless’ female in Sanju’s life. but look how terrible those scenes are. the way they are written and played by Manisha Koirala are cringeworthy
Instead, it’s all blame the drug dealer, blame the gangsters, blame the media. With a whole bunch of cho-chweet scenes. And neither do we get an insight into the why, the psychology of such a person. That’s a problem.
Yup, which is why it doesnt make much sense when at the end of the film when he tells his children that be like my father, not like me. you literally ask why? because whatever happened to you was not your fault. you had no choice, it was all others doing things to you rather than you doing things that shaped your life.
LikeLiked by 7 people
Rajesh (Chota)
July 4, 2018
“We know about the Bombay blasts, and Sanjay Dutt’s numerous trips to jail. What could have made these events interesting is the psychology — the why — but Hirani, one of our sunniest filmmakers, either doesn’t want to go there or is incapable of going there.”
Boy what a Brutal but Honest & logical take down of THE most successful director in Bollywood!! Need Balls to do it! Hats off Baddy, am a bigger fan of your reviews 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
July 4, 2018
MANK: Another thing to add to your point about “his films are always about the infantile male with the heart who is a locked in a battle against a (cartoonish) older male with the head.”
With Sanju, we see that this formula doesn’t work without this opponent being personified, cartoonishly or otherwise.
In Munnabhai and 3 Idiots, we had Boman Irani. In pk, we had Saurabh Shukla. In Lage Raho, we had Paresh Rawal. Here, there’s no “villain” — it’s very abstract. In the sense that you could say circumstance is the “villain.”
That kind of abstractness doesn’t fly when it’s this kind of broad treatment.
PS: Speaking of Boman, did anyone else laugh when he plays Ruby’s father and also turns up in the Munnabhai re-renactment? 😀
LikeLiked by 3 people
Srinivas R
July 4, 2018
“….his films are always about the infantile male with the heart who is a locked in a battle against a (cartoonish) older male with the head. and how the man child wins at the end” – that sums it up
LikeLike
The Ghost Who Walks
July 4, 2018
Well, this is disappointing.. If there is one celebrity who has been quite open yet remorseful about the various fuck-ups he did, it is Sanjay Dutt, unlike say, a Salman Khan. I was really expecting that this movie would defy the norm of white washing the subjects of biopics. Sadly, that doesn’t seem to have happened.
“We know about the Bombay blasts, and Sanjay Dutt’s numerous trips to jail. What could have made these events interesting is the psychology — the why — but Hirani, one of our sunniest filmmakers, either doesn’t want to go there or is incapable of going there.”
I don’t know if Hirani intended to white-wash Sanjay Dutt. But more likely, the above is the reason for what appears to be a rather bland movie. Hirani’s outlook (as seen thru his movies) just doesn’t match with the life full of excesses that Sanjay Dutt has led. I am wondering what would some one like an Anurag Kashyap would have done with the access to make a movie like this, or god forbid, even RGV.
LikeLike
MANK
July 4, 2018
With Sanju, we see that this formula doesn’t work without this opponent being personified, cartoonishly or otherwise.
Agreed, and here the older male – his father – is his biggest supporter . so his formula is further dented. to make things worse he creates straw man opponents out of stereotypes like the drug peddler, the gangster, the misunderstanding best friend, the media etc to tackle complex issues in the protagonist, that simplifies his already simplistic formula that he has so successfully recycled in film after film
If Sanju was an explicit hagiography like MSDhoni or Azhar, we could have simply dismissed it . but this film as being directed by the most successful and the most influential filmmaker in contemporary mainstream hindi cinema is a more hideously implicit hagiography , where the filmmaker pretends to go into dark places of the protagonist, but cherry picks those dark moments to suit his protagonist. this is what make this film very problematic
Speaking of Boman, did anyone else laugh when he plays Ruby’s father and also turns up in the Munnabhai re-renactment?
Nope, not me , because by the time the munnabhai scene came along , i had already forgotten Boman Irani’s character in the film 🙂
LikeLike
nikkie1602
July 4, 2018
@MANK what did sanjay dutt say about his sister?
LikeLike
MANK
July 4, 2018
nikkie1602
There is only one Mr and Mrs Dutt in Pali Hill (in Mumbai), and thats Manyata and I. Girls who become part of a new family after marriage must assume their new surname and all the responsibilities that come with it.
Thats a message not just to my sisters, but to all girls who hang on to their parents surname. Its become fashionable these days. But I strongly feel that doing so disrespects the person theyve married.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/No-sister-gets-along-with-her-brothers-wife-Dutt/articleshow/3997120.cms
And more on the family feud here
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/i-am-glad-dad-is-not-alive-to-see-this-priya-dutt/story-UNHgpRHJsGif9SIeTpLVuJ.html
LikeLike
hari
July 4, 2018
Singh has one regret even today. “Arms were delivered to Sanjay Dutt on 16 January. Instead of concealing them, if he had only told his patriotic father, who in turn would have surely informed us, we would have prevented the bombings and saved so many lives.”
https://theprint.in/opinion/cutesy-for-sanju-to-hurl-ma-behen-ki-at-journalists-it-cant-rewrite-1993-plot/78914/
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rocky
July 4, 2018
Interesting take by the “Great Bong”
Now Sanjay Dutt is no Azhar. He is way more influential, the archetype of Bollywood royalty, and for him nothing but the best will do.
So he gets Rajkumar Hirani, the one Bollywood director who has never made a flop film, and who understands, perhaps more than anybody else, how to package a product. And he gets arguably the best actor of the new generation to play him.
So yes, there is the lesser crime angle here too—that Sanju was a drug-addict and a philanderer, but even here, this is not a genuine mea culpa. Sanjay Dutt took to drugs because he is a sensitive man. He bought arms because he was impulsive and because he loved his parents. He slept with women in the hundreds, but that was just to fill the hole in his heart. Sure, he made some questionable calls, but he has suffered for that. Sure, he displayed lack of judgement, but then he is a big affection-seeking man-baby, he didn’t mean any harm. Sure, you may have heard some bad things about him, but the media made it up to sell magazines.
https://greatbong.net/2018/07/04/of-azhar-and-sanju-and-hagiographies/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rocky
July 5, 2018
Duggal Sahab (Shekhar Gupta ) is giving gyaan on Internal security today.# Kuch bhee
LikeLike
sachita
July 5, 2018
All of that drugs is bound to have an effect on the brain. Looks like it wasnt even good to start with.
LikeLike
Uncouth Village Youth
July 5, 2018
When I was a kid : Here, watch this biopic about a great man, from a different lifetime. Maybe you will like it.
When I’m an adult : Here, watch this biopic about a man with questionable ethics who has been widely reported on and scrutinized, in your lifetime. Maybe, you will start liking HIM.
Btw, when is AbRam’s biopic releasing or will Taimur beat him to it? Fingers crossed.
LikeLike
sanjana
July 5, 2018
UVY, my vote is for Taimur! Not this cutiepie but the real one whose bio will be interesting. Let Ranveer play this role in a Slb film.
LikeLiked by 1 person
rsylviana
July 5, 2018
I think the need to gloss over the why part of Dutt’s controversies must be less with needing to white-wash Dutt’s image, and more with wanting to make the film a hit. Because although the audience might claim to wanting an insight into Dutt’s psyche when he was going through his hard times , give them an entertainer which packs in a cerebral element within it, they would gladly give the film a thumbs down without as much as a second thought. Hard to fault Mr.Hirani for it.
Disclaimer – I don’t think any other director apart from Mr.Hirani would get this benefit of doubt , as he is one director who is a darling of both the classes and masses since he knows what his forte is and experiments & wins within that framework.
LikeLiked by 1 person
kaizokukeshav
July 5, 2018
Hirani is a director who has digested the fact that hypocrisy is the mother of success. No wonder he typically collaborates with actors who follow the same rule.
LikeLike
Madz
July 6, 2018
[The background score dictates our emotions. When a drug peddler (an amusing Jim Sarbh, with a lisp) tempts Sanjay Dutt with coke, the score says “something really bad is happening here,” and later, when Sanjay Dutt is taken away by the police, the score says “something really sad is happening here.”]
Ditto this. Apart from other problems, this spoon feeding is what got to my nerves: it includes the flashback cues (e.g. when Winnie takes Kamlesh on the NY location nostalgia trip), as if the audience is too pea-brained to remember locales, or dialogues. Cannot blame the makers if the audience does want to be spoon-fed, which is the message conveyed when such movies become blockbusters.
LikeLike
sanjana
July 6, 2018
‘Hirani is a director who has digested the fact that hypocrisy is the mother of success. No wonder he typically collaborates with actors who follow the same rule.’
How can actors be blamed? They are the only bright spots to elevate something average.
LikeLike
Apu
July 6, 2018
“In Lage Raho, we had Paresh Rawal.”
LikeLike
Rocky
July 8, 2018
Duggal Sahab is giving gyaan on Mumbai Film Industry today ..( I think he got the message that the bald editor in Sanju is based on him..sulag rahee hai !!
Shah Rukh has at least made a silent statement by playing leading characters with Muslim names in several films. Salman, on the other hand, has focused entirely on playing a good, all-conquering Hindu, demolishing even ISIS in one of his latest. He’s got a problem you see, being a convict like Sanju.
Baba bolta hai, abhee bas ho gaya .
https://theprint.in/national-interest/bollywoods-royals-brave-heroes-on-screen-spineless-zeroes-off-it/80136/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rocky
July 8, 2018
Have watched four episodes of Sacred Games, really liking Nawaz, Saif and Saif’s assistant and Radhika Aptey. I think Saif’s boss is the same guy who played a teacher in Hichkee ? He is brilliant as well.
Saif’s assistant reminds me of the assistant of Amit Saadh in “Breathe”, very realistic portrayal of the lower middle class life.
There is an Urdu Sher – (Please moderate if it offends anyone here) –
Yeh maana humney kee saaley Commie bahut Chutiya banatey hain..
Magar Huzoor khata maaf, Pichchcar bahut zordaar banatey hain..
LikeLike
brangan
July 8, 2018
I wish this account had been made into a movie. It’s far more convincing about the why-s…
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KUGzsTsYyav5IjWvy5mB1dQ7opgDwoml/view
LikeLike
An Jo
July 8, 2018
LikeLike
An Jo
July 8, 2018
And Anna puts it quite clearly what I have been saying, and in a quite better fashion, why I had a BIG problem with Hirani and Dutt under-playing the sisters’ role in Dutt’s coming back to life…
Avoiding Madhuri’s role in Dutt’s life is understandable; she’s moved on and is in a different phase: She played a role in his life but today, belongs to a ‘different’ family, But NOT his sisters!! They are his blood!!
https://www.ndtv.com/video/entertainment/left-right-centre/sanju-a-pretty-picture-488522
LikeLike
MANK
July 8, 2018
Shah Rukh has at least made a silent statement by playing leading characters with Muslim names in several films. Salman, on the other hand, has focused entirely on playing a good, all-conquering Hindu, demolishing even ISIS in one of his latest
Shekhar Gupta seems to have gone off his rockers here. this piece is not just disingenuous but also dangerous . Not to mention that the statement is itself is wrong. Hasn’t he seen Salman’s Sultan.And SRK made his name by playing NRI characters like Raj and Rahul. he is still identified with that image.
LikeLiked by 2 people
MANK
July 8, 2018
Avoiding Madhuri’s role in Dutt’s life is understandable; she’s moved on and is in a different phase: She played a role in his life but today, belongs to a ‘different’ family
Was there ever an affair between Dutt and Madhuri?. her secretary had said that it was all a publicity stunt . there were lot of rumors and both of them were starring together in a lot of films at the time, but there never was a confirmation by either of them , not to mention that Madhuri had vehemently denied the relationship in print. but more than that , my own personal devotion and admiration for Madhuri makes it impossible for me to believe that such a classy lady would get involved with a gunda like Dutt
LikeLike
Sifter
July 8, 2018
@ MANK- ….my own personal devotion to Madhuri…..
Waiting eagerly for that post from you!
….with a gunda like Dutt. I chortled at that ending. Have you not seen enough Hindi, Tamil or any other Indian language films to know that that is the type of pairing they love to beat down our throats with? And even better when that classy lady is also a rich-little-girl, a spoiled brat who has to be tamed in order for the gunda to marry her. Doesn’t matter whether it happens or happens very rarely in real life.
LikeLike
MANK
July 8, 2018
Sifter , LOL, yeah its a typical movie story that they re trying to ram down our throats as reality. no way am i accepting this
Waiting eagerly for that post from you
Hey, now why didn’t i think about this. this idea has promise . ill start working on it right away 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Anu Warrier
July 8, 2018
MANK – I was a journalist around that time. Rumours were rife – sort of ‘open secret’. And that her parents were dead against it. Finally, she broke it off. Or ‘so they say’. 🙂
But Madhuri came from a solid, middle-class background – and I can see how she could have been swept off her feet and then had hard common sense kick in.
LikeLike
brangan
July 8, 2018
Anu, I think you just broke MANK’s heart.
LikeLiked by 3 people
sanjana
July 8, 2018
Another biopic Yatra where Mammootty plays YSR is eagerly awaited.Telugu producers and directors are going for malayalee stars in a big way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
July 8, 2018
It is possible for sensible girls to fall for such guys. Just the way sensible men make mistakes. Especially in the toxic atmosphere of filmi duniya.
LikeLike
MANK
July 8, 2018
Anu, aaaagh! what a terrible thing to say 😢
No no no, I refuse to accept this under any circumstances. No way did that Dutt fellow get his drug stinking paws on her.😣
LikeLike
Srinivas R
July 9, 2018
MANK, from what I have read Sanjay Duty and Madhuri were ready to go against the whole world to get married, despite the fact that his wife was being treated for cancer. Then, he was arrested and Madhuri came to her sensed.
LikeLike
Vivek narain
July 9, 2018
‘I can’t do what I like,somehow, she said, I can only do what I must. It’s always like that way’ (Charteris). ‘For I don’t care too much for money/ for money can’t buy me love'(the beatles). ‘Once you hear details of victory, it is hard to distinguish it from defeat'(Sartre)’ She leaned forward her hands covering her face, and for the first time for many years she wept. She wasn’t weeping for Maurer.She was weeping for herself’ (Chase).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anu Warrier
July 9, 2018
BR – 🙂 You think he’ll ever forgive me?
@ MANK – Now you know why other stars’ fans refuse to accept any negative press about their idols?
@Srinivas – truth. (Or ‘so they say’. 🙂 )
In general: It’s not a crime, you know, falling in love. When people work in close proximity, it happens. She’s only human. And now she’s happily married, and by all accounts, in a strong, solid marriage. Why rake up the past?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Madan
July 9, 2018
I understand that Sanju Baba generously settled for an outright 9-10 crores plus a share of the film’s profits as the price for which VVC and Hirani could obtain permission to make a film about him. Considering this and what the reviews of the film indicate, the motive seems to be to both enrich Baba and also whitewash him as another human just like the one who is always being human. In that case, not going to see it. Not that it makes any difference since they are laughing all the way to the bank but still why should I. Man, Azhar gets slagged off for wanting to redeem his reputation while Baba is given a jhadu ki chappi after harbouring dangerous weapons for terrorists. Does this country REALLY have such a terrible sense of priorities? The mind boggles.
LikeLiked by 4 people
MANK
July 9, 2018
Anu, but but but ,.. this is no ‘other stars’, this is Madhuri for god’s sake, the one and only , the brightest and the divinest, second only to Sridevi . no other stars’ fans have the right to complain as us fans of sri and madhuri do
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rocky
July 9, 2018
Twenty thousand per day for Pagdee bandhna !!! wow ..Udta Punjab !!
One has heard that while the cost of Salman’s entourage costs about Rs. 30-40 thousand (approx) per day Diljit’s is more Rs.75000 (approx) per day. Diljit travels with an eight-member team, which includes his secretary, trainer, bouncer, and some of his friends. There is also a separate cost per day for the pagdi bandhne wale (the men who ties turbans) whose cost per day is Rs. 20,000. Even Salman doesn’t travel with such a big entourage when he’s shooting outside Mumbai. He comes from a Bollywood family and understands that such expenses are a burden on the producer.”
https://www.mynation.com/news/diljit-dosanjh-s-daily-expense-higher-than-that-of-salman-khan–pblg7t
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rocky
July 9, 2018
Do not entirely agree with the survey but it does have some truth to it..Ganda hai , par Dhanda hai yeh !!
We noted the significant presence of stereotypicality in these films with respect to religion and caste: In nearly 78% of the movies promiscuous women had a Christian name; 58% of the corrupt politicians in films had a Hindu brahmin last name; and, 62% of the corrupt businessman in films had a vaishya last name.
Eighty-four of the Muslims in films were shown as strongly religious and honest (even when they are shown in the film as engaged in crime) and 88% of the films presented kshatriya last-name individuals to be courageous. Nearly, 74% of the films presented Sikhs as laughable.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/editorials/stereotypicality-in-indian-cinema-is-not-a-healthy-trend/story-y6SG1xuOvBb0cZfWJpUg0H.html
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
July 9, 2018
Anu, but but but ,.. this is no ‘other stars’, this is Madhuri for god’s sake, the one and only , the brightest and the divinest, second only to Sridevi
I have to laugh. I was, I think, 8 when I head-butted my older brother in the stomach for daring to make fun of Amitabh Bachchan. (I still say my brother deserved it. 🙂 )
But…what is the difference between you and say, Salman ‘bhai’s’ fans, who refuse to believe anything negative about their hero? Degrees of difference? And so it goes – every idol’s fans will claim the positives for themselves and the negatives as vile canards.
Nice, wholesome, well-brought-up Madhuri falling for the bad boy of the industry is not a surprise. And that she distanced herself is not a shock either.
If you stop your hand-wringing enough to stop smiling (which I’m sure you are) we can bond over Madz love. C’mon, olive branch here. 🙂
I like her a lot. At her best, there was no contemporary in commercial cinema to beat her. (Sri was her senior and there’s no comparison there – at least, to me.)
LikeLike
Rocky
July 9, 2018
Speaking of stereotypes recently I was pleasantly surprised when John Abraham mentioned in one of his promotional interviews for “Parmanu” ( a brilliant film) that Diana Penty asked for the script in Devnagri before she okayed to be part of the film. Apparently she does not like hindi words written in English.
I was surprised not because of her name but because of the generation that she belongs to.
Tum hee ho bandhu, tim hee sakha ho !!
LikeLike
MANK
July 9, 2018
But…what is the difference between you and say, Salman ‘bhai’s’ fans, who refuse to believe anything negative about their hero?
there you go again……………. you think i am as worse as the bhaitards. eh
its not the question of believing. its about a duel that’s going on inside me between the rational mind and an irrational heart. And in Madhuri’s case , the irrational triumphs over the rational. i cant help it. just so that you’d understand it better, i would rephrase a famous song “i’d rather live in her perfect world.Than live with an imperfect her in mine” 🙂
I like her a lot. At her best, there was no contemporary in commercial cinema to beat her. (Sri was her senior and there’s no comparison there – at least, to me.)
Amen to that and Olive branch accepted , peace 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vivek narain
July 10, 2018
Another slender and delicate beauty, Malvika Tiwari,though she didn’t launch a thousand cliches with her smile, had oodles of oomph.Very similar to Madhuri in looks and grace and even brahmin surname,Malvika is the unsung heroine, a daring businesswoman and quite an old hand in worldliness. A celebrity who transcends wikipedia.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Anu Warrier
July 10, 2018
@MANK – no, that was just an analogy. That’s the first name that popped into my head. Make that SRK’s fans or AB’s fans or Rajinikant’s fans – the principle is the same.
But never mind – you know what I mean. 🙂
LikeLike
Rocky
July 10, 2018
Having watched all 8 episodes of The Sacred Games , I think Inside Edge was much superior to Sacred Games. The book was very entertaining though.
LikeLike
Rocky
July 11, 2018
FYI- 102 Not Out is now streaming on Amazon Prime, Raazi will be available on Prime on Friday the 13th….
LikeLike
Rocky
July 11, 2018
Re.-Another slender and delicate beauty, Malvika Tiwari, Malivika ( the Nivea girl) and Meher Jessia were the super Models in mid eighties .
LikeLike
Rocky
July 11, 2018
Just finished watching 102 not out, completely bowled with the movie, brilliant acting by both Bachchan and Rishi Kapoor and great story (although a bit unrealistic ).
I was afraid that I will not like
Bachchan in the role based off the trailers , but the trailer IMO was misleading and annoying , the last 40 minutes he just nailed it with his restrained acting.
P.S.- Rangan sir, you did not review 102 ? aisa kyon?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Naveen
July 12, 2018
the very first question mark i got when i read the new of the launch of the Sanju project was “Why on SD? why should ppl go and watch a biopic on him? he is neither a great actor/star nor someone to look upon for anything”
i think this is bollywood self-selling itself. i would be more curious to watch a biopic on Sasikala. she will be a good person to some set of people too.why not a biopic on Sunny Deol ( another SD ) ! well, the movie is minting movie, so all is well
LikeLiked by 1 person
An Jo
July 22, 2018
I hadn’t known this – but if true, truly a new low using one’s mother’s death…
https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/sanju-director-reveals-sanjay-dutt-s-secret-of-sleeping-with-308-women-1267633-2018-06-23
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
July 22, 2018
@An Jo – just read that article; it’s appalling.
LikeLike
An Jo
July 22, 2018
@Anu: This I feel, is a serious thing and cannot be brushed under the carpet with the ‘Sootron ke Anusaar’ shite. I mean, high or no high, this is crap and if this is false, Sanjay really needs to sue these folks. However, if this is true, Sanjay needs to come forward and accept, since, of course, nothing is hidden, right?
It’s a double-edged sword that Sanjay is holding, and he better stick to it; otherwise, all this 300 crore, as much as it is the public’s fault; is as well his..
LikeLike
An Jo
July 22, 2018
@Sanjana: I noticed that whatever I posted with regard to Sanjay utilizing his mother’s death was liked by you earlier; and now I see that it is not liked. I am NOT interested in scoring any likes or ‘points’ but just wanted to know that whatever you did that was on your own; and I am DEFINITELY OK with the sense that you did that on your own…
And by that BR Saab, am not even inclining anything toward you..
If it’s technical glitch, please forgive me; or even if you have changed your mind, it’s fine. However, I take this thing very seriously when one’s mother is brought into the question..
LikeLike
brangan
July 22, 2018
I don’t even understand that comment. Are you suggesting that I am moderating the ‘likes’? I don’t think such a thing is possible…
LikeLike
An Jo
July 22, 2018
BR Saab:
Let me expand. A couple of hours back, I had seen that my response to Anu Warrier was liked by Sanjana. Then suddenly, the ‘like’ was gone. And that’s fine: As far as Sanjana herself decided that the comment was not like-worthy.
All I am saying is, I, of course made a controversial yet a decisive statement that nobody that utilizes his or her’s mother’s death to achieve ulterior motives needs to be forgiven..
When I posted the reply, I saw that Sanjana liked it..and then suddenly that like was taken apart..is it some pressure? Or is it a technical glitch..is all I am wondering..
And it’s upto folks to decide what they think or not..I stand very clear on this..
LikeLike
sanjana
July 22, 2018
Actually I clicked like and then by mistake clicked and it disappeared. Once again I clicked and same thing happened. My mouse is doing this thing. It is working weirdely and I usually use a desktop or phone to type. Many of my spelling mistakes also happen due to this. And I check and recheck before I post. I have to go for a new mouse.
LikeLike
An Jo
July 22, 2018
LOL Sanjana; the mice are responsible for all this: And here I was thinking of an Orwellian conspiracy.. Apologize to everyone for wasting time and internet space: However, the accusation is still serious..
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
July 22, 2018
By the way many of likes to my posts also disappear when I check once again. But I just shrug it off after feeling surprised. Maybe someone clicked by mistake. Sometimes embarrasingly I like my own posts and then I remove the like. This happens when I use my phone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vivek narain
July 22, 2018
There are so many nice and decent whores that any talk of conquest is simply self deception and an exercise in quackery. Infact indulging in market should be the legitimate way for bluebeards, and it is far superior qualitatively as well as quantitatively.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
July 22, 2018
An Jo, considering this was Hirani who said this, I’m assuming this is something Sanju told him. Probably boasting in a manner that teens do of ‘scoring’ (quite forgetting that he was in his mid-twenties to early thirties when he was doing this). It is appalling.
LikeLike
sanjana
July 23, 2018
There is no dislike button here. It is only like button. Even if one withdraws like by mistake or on purpose, it does not mean dislike. I am one of those who fought vehemently when there used to be dislike button. It was used by some to settle scores or most of the times genuine dislike. But it used to leave a bad taste for some of us. There were groups who collectively disliked whenever one of their group members did dislike a comment. And they collectively liked comments also. Due to apex who used dislike button extensively and the furore he caused during that period, thankfully dislike button was withdrawn.
Thank you apex, wherever you are for this collateral outcome. Though I did not go with what you have done here or elsewhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Madan
July 23, 2018
BR: This is why I would rather you didn’t have the like button at all. The comments people post show where they stand. A like or absence of it is not the only thing that signifies agreement or disagreement.
LikeLiked by 2 people
sanjana
July 23, 2018
Vivek, a request. Please dont use that word whore. It is demeaning just like the word bastard. It sounds too Shakesperean!
LikeLike
sanjana
July 23, 2018
Anu and An Jo, I am not surprised about that at all. What can one expect from him? Nothing shocks me about Dutt or any other person anymore. I just feel sad for him and his mother. By this I feel Hirani brought out the darkest things into public domain by default. His whitewashing has gone horribly wrong. Dutt allegedly used his mother and her death for temporary conquests. He is not the first one or the last one to do such things. Someone had hidden his mother’s dead body to get pension and someone tried to kill his father to get a job reserved for children whose parents die during service. Girls killing mothers when they refuse their choice is also happening. Many kill their parents for property. But when a celebrity does this it becomes news because we want to believe that celebrities are role models.
LikeLike
Vivek narain
July 23, 2018
Sounds a bit lowly, but it’s still the most benign word for the sake of lucidity. A bloke who has done 5yr stretch in a cell, finds it hard to get over the jailbird look, and that’s why he strives to subsitute one felony with other. He boasts just to layer the conviction with lechery and if that becomes heavy he may resort to another equally vile enterprise. The mores terrify him, he is afraid of being an outcast before he’s finished with high living.
LikeLike
Rahini David
July 23, 2018
Sanjana: You seem to remember the veiled abuse that Apex specialized in. He did two mistakes.
He openly picked a specific woman to torment (yours truly) He became quite openly offensive quite rapidly.
Some times such obviously creepy men set a standard in slime that those who follow seem relatively benign.
I have plenty to say to those who are honestly wondering why I bother to say this while I can obviously choose to look elsewhere. In short, “it does not work that way”
At least this one has not gathered the admiration of a starry eyed online cheerleader.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Rocky
September 14, 2018
Raju Hirani on Algebra –
LikeLike
shashwat203442461
April 13, 2019
The irony is that you work for the co-producer’s wife.
LikeLike
Madan
April 14, 2019
I did eventually catch this film when it came on TV. I didn’t want to watch but Ranbir’s acting hooked me in. And I thought Paresh Rawal would be terribly miscast but he adapted well to the role and in spite of not resembling Sunil Dutt in the slightest, captured the essence. The problems with the whitewashing remain.
But there’s another trick the film misses and this has to do with the fourth wall obsession of our mass films. Especially like Tamil mass films, this film too directly speaks to the fans with a presumed ‘knowledge’ that Sanju baba is amazing. Suppose a Hollywood critic were to watch this, he would want to know what exactly accounted for the Sanju baba phenomenon. His career trajectory is very unusual in Bollywood and there aren’t many others who have come back so many times after floundering and being written off. I have seen first hand the mass hysteria he evoked. I have mentioned this story before but one night I was at the airport waiting with the driver to pick up dad. Sanju walked out of the terminal. Within seconds, he was mobbed by people and most of them being drivers like ours. Our driver too was exclaiming, “Sonjoy Doth” in his Bengali accent and he probably thought me a zombie in that moment for being so unmoved and indifferent.
How did he win this kind of love and loyalty from people so far removed socially from him? After all, Sanjay is not an outsider like Shah Rukh. He was born with a silver spoon. I can guess what aspects of the life he led may have made him relatable to the working class but the film could have been so much more interesting had it explored this. When you watch the Cash or Putnam biopics, you do get an insight into what made them who they were. That is completely missing here. Which begs the question: if we already know everything there is to know about Sanju, what’s the point of a film anyway, er, apart from propoganda?
LikeLike