(by G Waugh)
You are all made up of atoms. A large portion of the atom is just empty space. A very small portion of it contains the nucleus. The nucleus is so, so tiny but inspite of its infinitesimal size it holds the protons and neutrons together. A strong nuclear force packs all the protons and neutrons into that unimaginably tiny space while a weak nuclear force keeps the spinning electrons in orbit around the nucleus. If an electron moves from one orbit to another, it emits energy. But the energy that an invisible atom contains is just immense. Can you believe if I say your entire body if converted into its equivalent form of energy, shall be as powerful as a hundred atom bombs that exploded at Hiroshima?
This is precisely why I want you to read science. It is so interesting that you will realize at a point that, all the dullness and monotony that you experience in life is concentrated only in the field of your vision. Anything that is outside it, regardless of whether it is too large or too tiny is just as interesting as hell.
Will you believe if I say there are millions of explosions a hundred times larger than you have seen in Hollywood action films happening every single instant as you are reading this now? If you won’t believe, of course I can understand- since what all of us have been trained to think about most of the time is whether our office-bus shall arrive at the right time at the stop or which political party shall sweep the next Assembly elections. But what I said is just the truth. There is nothing truer than my ‘explosion’ idea. If there is no such explosion, you and me simply won’t exist. Forget your office and your routines. The Sun is the place where explosions several times stronger than the most powerful hydrogen bomb every conceived by man happens every single second and without them, there is simply no day and night. All the light and heat that you are exposed to every second, owe their origins to these never-ending explosions. But the explosions even if they happen millions of miles away from us are not without their harmful effects. The ultra-violet radiation that accompanies the light and the cosmic radiation that the universe is so full of can simply pulverize your body the moment you come in touch with them. But the Earth is not only the place on which you can simply tread at hundred miles per hour in your car on a traffic-free Sunday morning. There is more to it- the ball on which we live is made up of three layers, one of which is called the mantle whose filler is molten in nature. The mantle provides the required magnetic field needed to deflect the harmful cosmic radiation while a thin layer of ozone that wraps the Earth like a polythene shroud wards off the ultra-violet radiation that comes from the explosion-ridden Sun. If you are alive on this Earth, it is due to a combination of these curious circumstances for which you could choose to be thankful if you wish.
Let me follow this up with a very brief history of how science helped man unravel the secrets of nature and where we stand now in our progress. If at the end of the essay, you are still not enamoured of the subject, okay well and good. If you think you love it, I have given a set of books at the end, that will make your journey to the center of the Universe all the more exciting.
***
The scientists of the last few centuries tried to understand the nature of an atom. If the behavior of an atom is somehow understood, they assumed they will be able to explain the whole ‘idea’ behind the Universe. Just like how all of us think we are born on this planet for a purpose, they thought that if the Universe exists, there must be an idea and a whole ‘purpose’ behind it. Initially, the atom was assumed to be just a particle. A lot of physical phenomena were explained on this assumption but some key concepts such as gravity did not fit in. So they decided to change their assumptions.
A scientist named Young once allowed light to pass through a screen with two vertical slits to see the pattern that emerges on a second screen behind. The light that emerged produced a pattern of alternating bright and dark patches, much to his astonishment. This kind of patching was not possible if the light were just composed of mere photon ‘particles’. Without possessing a property called ‘interference’ the light-producing photons couldn’t have formed those alternating patches. And particles cannot in all probability ‘interfere’ with one another. To possess interference, they must not have been particles but waves. So a new idea emerged and it was called the ‘wave theory’ that displaced the ‘particle’ idea behind atomic and subatomic entities.
But the ‘wave’ theory too had a lot of limitations. It could not explain the photoelectric effect or the properties of light propagating through a vacuum. So scientists found a new idea. Some phenomena of the atom were explicable through the ‘particle’ hypothesis while others made sense through the ‘wave’ hypothesis. So why don’t we combine both and create a new theory? Let us imbibe an atom with dual properties similar to our masala movie heroes who remain docile in the first half and turn borderline brutal in the second. Here is what we call it, the ‘quantum’ theory which means the atom is neither just a particle nor just a wave but simply ‘both’. The scientists considered this a ‘great’ victory that helped them understand all the properties of atomic and subatomic particles and the whole ‘idea’ behind the universe they thought, was just simply a block or two away.
***
“The Bihar Earthquake is a divine chastisement for the great sin we have committed against those whom we describe as Harijans”. This was Gandhi in 1934 when thousands of people were killed on account of a massive earthquake.
“When this Kali Yuga ends, the God will descend on the Earth, destroy it and create a whole new planet”. This was my mother when I was a ten-year old kid in 1999.
“Kerala is being punished by God through torrential rains and floods because those God-hating communists opened the Sabarimala temple for menstruating women”. These were Hindu right-wingers a couple of years back mocking the sufferings of Kerala people who were struggling to survive a natural calamity.
You can’t blame mankind for attributing every single natural phenomenon on this world to its own acts and behaviours. For centuries together, people believed that the Sun was actually revolving around the Earth and that every single being that existed on this planet was made for them to consume. So we took the liberty of drilling down mountains to extract minerals, oil and coal, we butchered animals that couldn’t register a sign of protest, we caught fishes and other aquatic beings in millions without a smidgen of remorse. Man for centuries together, thought he was the centre of everything around him and if the Earth sometimes behaved adversely it was because it was angry and was trying to punish him.
***
There is a place called Yellowstone National Park in the US and the park extends to hundreds of miles in the State of Wyoming. Every year close to a million people visit it on account of its curious geography and intriguing landscape. The National Park came into being on such a wide landmass owing to one singular condition- the entire region was once a super-volcano that explodes at indefinable time intervals.
The ‘volcano’ concept itself is a very curious thing and if a mountain decides to explode, it will lead to frequent earthquakes and climate changes in the surrounding area. But the Yellowstone is considered to be a super-volcano. A super-volcano is one which, if it explodes will lead to emission of tonnes and tonnes of lava, triggering massive earthquakes and changes in the climate that might easily amount to a massive destruction of life and property in a large portion of the continent itself. The Yellowstone is dotted with something what you call ‘geysers’ which are pretty much sudden outbursts of hot water that reach a height of over a hundred feet and stay there for quite a while. Scientists and geologists working in the Yellowstone still don’t have the faintest idea of how these geysers suddenly burst forth into being or where the next geyser will make its appearance. They have a lot of sophisticated equipment in place to study the supervolcano behaviour but their predictions about the next eruption are accurate only in the range of thousands of years.
After all, the Earth was formed 4.5 billion years before man was born on it and any predictions we make are bound to be in keeping with the Earth’s massive time-scale. Some scientists at the Yellowstone calculate that the super-volcano erupts once in every 6,00,000 years and the last eruption according to reliable estimates happened at an eerily approximate 6,00,000 years ago. As we see, an eruption that has the potential to wipe out almost a continent is very much on the cards and as responsible citizens shouldn’t we be considering vacating the region now?
The answer is no. The number of 6,00,000 years is pretty much an estimate. There might be an error in the range of 10,000 years which is too tiny considering the age of the planet. You might as a responsible President of the United States order a large-scale evacuation with so much scientific evidence and love for humanity to back you up but the eruption might not take place at all in the next two thousand years or so.
So what do we gather from this? The Earth is pretty much a mysterious place. The reason why Earthquakes occur is still not clear and the science of plate tectonics that could predict them is still in its infancy. The same applies to volcanoes. The Earth was formed out of a clump of dust particles that burst from a star some billions of years ago and the moon that revolves around us is nothing but a broken piece that was driven out of the Earth by a massive asteroid that hit it long, long back.
If Earth were located a mere five percent closer to the Sun in our orbit, the heat of our nearest Star would simply burn all life down. If we were distant from it by the same proportion, the Earth would be full of frost and ice-sheets that shall kill every one of us. So if we are here alive going through the vagaries of time and destiny, it is all because of a combination of favourable accidents.
The dinosaurs, the largest ever predators that populated the Earth for over 170 million years, had they not died on account of a meteor that fell on our Earth 65 million years ago, there would have been no monkeys, apes or chimpanzees and consequently none of us. If someone tells you the whole universe was meticulously designed and crafted for our taking, you know what to tell them.
***
When Einstein invented the E=mc^ equation, pretty much everything on this planet seemed to adhere to the rule. The equation was a grand success and the whole of mankind was celebrating it in various ways. Man had proved once again that he was the most advanced among the species on the Earth and the whole ‘idea’ behind creation was right in front of him on a small sheet of paper. There was nothing more to invent or hypothesize and some journals were writing obituaries mourning the end of ‘Science’.
But some decades later, scientists decided to venture into space and tried applying Einstein’s equation to things out there. The energy to everyone’s shock, was found to have literally nothing to do with the mass of things in space. The ‘grand’ equation broke into smithereens and the much-celebrated quantum physics made no sense at all just a few miles away from the atmosphere. There was so much invisible matter and energy out in the space and scientists decided to call it ‘dark’ energy and ‘dark’ matter. It has been decades since these names were given and we are still in many ways, very much in the ‘dark’ with respect to what happens in space.
***
A few decades ago, something called DNA was found in human cells to which almost all of our daily physiological activities and behavior was attributed to. Can you believe a single strand of human DNA located inside one of your billion invisible cells is not less than six feet long, if unfurled fully? The DNA was found to contain four types of bases- Adenine, Guanine, Thiamine and Cytosine and a combination of these was said to constitute the entire genetic constitution of man. Numerous parts of the DNA called as ‘genes’ were found to influence every behavior in our body and if these components were somehow ‘cracked’, the whole idea behind ‘life’ it was assumed, could be found out.
But this was another massive failure. More than 90 percent of the DNA strands had only empty fillers and no single component could in isolation, be treated as responsible for a specific human trait. It was hence inferred that genes do not work on their own to produce a tangible ‘trait’ in man and the entire human organism and its behavior was the outcome of an inimitable symphony that all these genes carry out flawlessly with breathtaking internal co-ordination.
***
Man invented ‘quantum’ physics to find out the ‘idea’ behind all of creation and failed. He invented genetics to study and know the background of his body and failed. He thought he had split the atom into its three primal components and mastered its design but soon was mortified when he found there were more confusing subatomic particles such as quarks and bosons and muons inside.
Aren’t we the only species with six senses and the most advanced brain ever found on this planet? Why are we still groping in the dark to crack the ‘idea’ behind creation? After all, don’t we think we are the only ones with the power and the entitlement to conjure rains out of clouds to help ourselves and lesser organisms live happily, through prayers and supplications to the forces at work? Why do we fail time and again?
If there is a consensus among scientists on anything in this world, it is only on one thing. There might be no ‘grand’ idea behind the creation of the Universe at all and hence no solid purpose behind its functioning. Or if there is one, it is still beyond the reach of us. If it is beyond us, does it mean we would just need some more centuries to get there? May be yes. May be no. But for the time being, it is good to assume that we can one fine day, pin the whole ‘idea’ down. We will find out for certain what is going on within and outside us and get a chance to announce to posterity, the realization of mankind’s greatest success ever. But to get there, before we fasten our belts we must know exactly what we have and what we lack.
The Universe, if it hasn’t made sense to us, it might not only because we haven’t gotten there yet. There could be a couple of other reasons as well. It could be because we are just mere components of the Universe, and each component does not need to know the whole story behind its functioning. The heart doesn’t need to know that it is part of a big human body and its function of cleaning the blood is central to the whole being’s existence. Aham Brahmasmi.
Or it may be because the Universe doesn’t have the need to make sense to us. We may all be simply insects on Its whole body and if an ant that climbs over your neck gets crushed beneath your fingers, it is not because you hated its colour or behavior. On some occasions when you were fast asleep for hours the ant might have with impunity travelled all over your body which doesn’t mean it did something to appease you and you decided to tolerate it. The ant is a non-entity to you as long as it doesn’t disturb you and hence you have no obligation to make sense to it. Similarly, the Earth or the Universe if it had a form that we could interact with, might not after all, even recognize us. Forms of life on this planet including the most advanced like us came into being on account of their excellent adaptability to the myriad conditions that prevailed over it and the Earth or the Universe never had any obligation or necessity to create or destroy us. After all, we have only six senses most of which operate under a plenty of restrictions. We can see only seven colors or just a combination of them and those that exist beneath or above the bounds of certain wavelengths are completely beyond our visibility. Similarly, the Universe might have properties that are completely beyond the reaches of human understanding. Our inadequacies might be a temporary or a permanent handicap but they are without doubt effective hindrances towards our journey towards the Eternity.
Subhadra
September 13, 2020
Hi Jeeva
I have been reading your articles lately in varied topics and always found intriguing. This particular one has blown me away. You seem to be well-read, awesome for you and your readers like me. Did you get a chance to read metaphysician Vallalar’s hymns
LikeLike
N Madhusudhan
September 13, 2020
Oh my god. That was just mind-blowing. I always thought of scientists as people who take themselves and their work a bit too seriously (i have a cousin to blame for that). But it is wonderful when something is presented to us in a way we can all comprehend, like this article. Jeeva, you are firing on all cylinders man. I don’t understand everything you write but I am slowly becoming a fan of yours.
LikeLike
N Madhusudhan
September 13, 2020
” I have given a set of books at the end, that will make your journey to the center of the Universe all the more exciting.” – This seems to have got missed out. We don’t see it in the article.
LikeLike
Guru
September 14, 2020
WOW!!! This is a mind-blowing article. Please share the list of books.
LikeLike
gsriram72
September 14, 2020
Jeeva!. What a writing!
I have been interested in science ever since I was introducted to it by the late Sujatha (Rangarajan) through En? Etharku? Eppadi? I am a firm believer in scinece and some of the things that i have “discovered” are through reading about science.
My favourite book is “The Shoet History of Nearly Everything” by Bill Bryson.
So beautifully written with a right amout of humour. I have been avid reader of his books since then including his latest “The Body”.
He also wonders about the Universe from the Macro to the mIcro and the scientists discovered that the Macro rules may not necessarily work in the micro universe.
Thank you for your writing and excellent piece as always.
LikeLike
Heisenberg
September 14, 2020
Nice one Jeeva. Incidentally I recently read this article on ‘The Wire’ and since then have been reading about wave-particle duality and the double slit experiment. Even tempted to read about Upanishads given how Schrodinger took it to his grave. You might like this article if you haven’t read it yet.
https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/erwin-schrodinger-quantum-mechanics-philosophy-of-physics-upanishads/?fbclid=IwAR3d79HaJKurORscw3T63mr-0YVceLLbbVCDJqoVn7OAOPoVtlO6lDklxk4
LikeLike
Heisenberg
September 14, 2020
And to add a bit more about the DNA.
It’s really fascinating how 4 letter code can encode all the information needed for life. The way it is packaged in our cells and how it winds/unwinds at specific points at specific times in specific cells every time (almost) is pure magic. And when the process goes wrong at any time, there are checkpoints that are activated and the cell tries to make a correction, and if it fails it will be programmed to death. Only very rarely a small part in this marvelous process goes wrong leading to diseases like Cancer.
A fun trivia about DNA is, if we put together all the dna from all cells in 1 persons body like a thread, the total length will be twice the diameter of our solar system. The design is just mindboggling.
LikeLike
Jeeva Pitchaimani
September 14, 2020
For some more brief introductions into the subject by the same author, please go through the below:
1)https://baradwajrangan.wordpress.com/2020/06/25/readers-write-in-213-the-real-purpose-of-education-is-the-joy-of-discovery/
2)https://baradwajrangan.wordpress.com/2020/07/17/readers-write-in-223-you-and-me-are-stars-wait-what/
3)https://baradwajrangan.wordpress.com/2020/08/01/readers-write-in-236-a-quick-guide-to-darwin-and-marx/
4)https://baradwajrangan.wordpress.com/2020/08/21/readers-write-in-248-the-selfish-gene-theory-of-dawkins-simplified/
For further reading,
A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking
Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain by David Eagleman
On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins
Cosmos by Carl Sagan
Guns, Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond
The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking
Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari
Origins: Fourteen Billion Years of Cosmic Evolution by Neil DeGrasse Tyson
The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins
The Gene: An Intimate History by Siddhartha Mukherjee
Sum: Forty tales from the Afterlives by David Eagleman
A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
LikeLiked by 2 people
Jeeva Pitchaimani
September 14, 2020
Thank you Subhadra, Madhusudhan, Guru and Sriram.
Subhadra I havent read Vallalar before. But I hope to in the future.
LikeLike
An Jo
September 15, 2020
I would highly recommend GUNS, GERMS, and STEEL by Jared Diamond; one hell of a book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
krishikari
September 15, 2020
Another super article, I really enjoyed reading it.
@anjo Guns Germs and Steel and also Collapse by the same author. I would count among the non-fiction books that can change your life. Or your world view.
LikeLike
krishikari
September 15, 2020
On the Origin of Species is the most beautifully written science book of all time IMO. Back in the day scientists could also communicate the subtleties of their discoveries and theories, why has it become a lost art?
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
September 15, 2020
So many good recommendations here – have read many of them; will look for the others too.
I loved Silent Spring by Rachel Carson too. And Surely You’re Joking, Mr Feynman was a great introduction when I was a teen. Gödel, Escher, Bach was another favourite. If you haven’t already read this, then The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat is a fascinating read.
LikeLike
marsant
September 24, 2020
“So a new idea emerged and it was called the ‘wave theory’ that displaced the ‘particle’ idea behind atomic and subatomic entities.”
A small correction here, the wave theory was proposed before Young’s double slit experiment, due to Newton’s corpuscular theory being accepted at that time, it didn’t inspire many minds, but Young’s double slit showed the wave-nature of light
then de Broglie (pronounced de Broy) came up and said, ‘wait, light behaves as a wave sometimes, as a particle sometimes, so let’s assume it has dual nature’ (it’s a particle with some wavelength) which is called the de Broglie’s hypothesis. And since dual nature worked for radiation (like light), it was extended to matter too.
this forms the basis for the quantum theory extended by Schrodinger, Dirac and others
LikeLike
Marsant
September 24, 2020
With all due respect this seems like a sloppy mishmash of Neil deGrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku videos.
The way you have exaggerated and undermined Einstein’s contributions (not to mention the missing square term on the formula)
Einstein nor the world ever claimed that the answer to everything was on a sheet of paper. He was the one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, inadvertently though as he deserted it later because he thought it didn’t make sense. And his noble-winning, groundbreaking contribution about the photoelectric effect is shockingly missing just as much as Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism is (but I guess it isn’t as popular as Einstein nor does fit the narrative).
I don’t know about other topics but that Aham Brahmasmi is so out of context and inaccurate here looks like you needed some big upanishadic connection with understanding universe to drive home your point.
You are right about humans being nowhere close to understanding the workings of universe and the last paragraph is one of the best things I have read recently, the previous ones are either taken largely out-of-context or gross over exaggerations (at best) or misinformation (at worst) and should be taken with a huge grain of NaCl.
NOTE: all the books mentioned are all great entry points to learn how science works in decoding the universe but that is not all and any serious pursuit should be supported by reputed textbooks and/or with interactive learning.
LikeLike
Jeeva Pitchaimani
September 24, 2020
@marsant I acknowledge the errors or the chronological flaws in my essay. My intent behind the essay was just to inspire people who dont have much of an interest in science and propel them towards the field. I bear no pretensions to be scholarly and the tone of the essay was to match the delight of a kid who is for the first time looking at the stars or the rainbow. I just tried to snatch whatever I remember with regard to my amateurish knowledge in science acquired through reading of these popular science books and put together a story. And I dont think I sound like an authority on the field too. I understand the field of science is greatly dependent on precision, evidence and verifiable conclusions but that is one of the reasons normal people stay away from the field just like how they treat economics. If there is something you can take home from my essay on science it is just the wonder a non-scientific person like me has on that field, and if you question me on Einstein or about the accuracy of any scientific principles I know I am not the person for it.
LikeLike
Marsant
September 24, 2020
@Jeeva, that’s fantastic, people like you are really rare! I’m really relieved that you took it in the right sense! I’m no subject matter expert too, only shared what I thought could have been explained better. As I said, I strongly agree with your point in the article AND I admire your intention which is well-placed and inspiring. Carry on!
LikeLiked by 2 people