The only success of the film is that it becomes a powerful tool for anyone who wants to battle nepotism. I mean: Mahesh Bhatt’s younger daughter plays the heroine in the sequel to a film which featured Mahesh Bhatt’s older daughter…
Spoilers ahead…
When people howled that Sadak 2 was a dog, I felt it was an overreaction. I mean, maybe the movie is bad, but surely it can’t be as bad as they’re saying it is. But when you watch the film, you see that it’s not bad at all. “Bad” is too mild a word for what Sadak 2 is. This is an expanse of awfulness so unprecedented from a major-name filmmaker (okay, a once major-name filmmaker) that the first viewer who watched it must have felt like Columbus: it must have been like setting foot on uncharted territory. Henceforth, film ratings scales will have to range from FIVE STARS to SADAK 2. It’s hilariously bad. It’s howlariously bad. It’s… owl-ariously bad. There’s an actual owl in the screenplay. Its name is Kumbhkaran. It’s set loose on Gulshan Grover, because in the world of this film, when you want to kill a gangster, you set loose on him an owl named Kumbhkaran. Oh, the ignominy for the gangster. You want to die a death of glory, taking a bullet in the heart, still standing, smiling a fuck-you! smile at the police. Instead, you succumb to owl-pecking.
The owl may be a metaphor for this movie’s badness. You see, for the longest while, our feathered friend is nowhere in sight – though you may recall his human equivalent from the first film. Ravi (Sanjay Dutt) was an insomniac, a (wait for it!)… night owl! (Ooh, how devilishly clever!) He’s still a taxi driver, and he’s still suicidal — in Sadak, he wanted to kill himself because his sister died, and here, he wants to kill himself because his wife Pooja (Pooja Bhatt) died. Maybe it would help if Pooja didn’t keep talking to him from beyond the grave, and if he didn’t keep responding. Or maybe he just wants to escape mouthing lines like this one: “Kiske liye jee-oon main? Jisne meri zindagi ko zindagi di, woh to chali gayi!” (I’ll attempt an in-spirit translation: “The wife that gave life to my life has left this life and gone to the afterlife.”)
For about thirty seconds, I amused myself with a cunningly meta touch. “Hum tere bin kahin reh nahin paate”, the chartbusting Nadeem-Shravan number from Part 1, plays on the radio inside Ravi’s taxi. As far as I recall, Ravi did not record the song while he sang it in 1991. After Pooja’s death, did he – like the protagonist in Woody Allen’s The Purple Rose of Cairo — step out of the screen and into the real world, run to the nearest computer, download the .mp3, and re-enter the screen? Or did Pooja courier it to him from wherever she was? Or was it Mahesh Bhatt’s doing? Did he read his screenplay and think: “Fucking hell, there’s an owl in here, with a name from the Ramayana. I’d better play a song from the older film to at least remind people of the filmmaker I was!”
The keen viewer, then, may notice another meta touch. It’s the point where the heroine Aarya (Alia Bhatt) says, “Mujhe kya pata tha ki mera saga baap, my daddy, mujhe maarna chahta hai!” You wonder if Aarya is saying the line, or Alia is. You’ve heard of “career suicide”. This may be “career murder”. Other fathers have been guilty of this crime, certainly. But when Harry Baweja gave his son Harman Love Story 2050, it came with a fifty-crore budget (for 2008!), a time machine and Priyanka Chopra. Mahesh Bhatt gives Alia… an owl. Sadak 2 made me recall what the critic Baburao Patel said of a Shantaram movie in Filmindia: something along the lines of “mental masturbation of a senile mind”. Is this what you do to your (I apologise in advance) owl-aad?
Let’s take a minute here to mourn remember Mahesh Bhatt, the original iconoclast. He was Ram Gopal Varma before Ram Gopal Varma. He was the director under whose gaze Hindi cinema grew chest hair and began to carry a condom in its wallet — and like most of his flaws-and-all work in the eighties and nineties, Sadak carried a charge. The outline may have come from Taxi Driver, but it was its own thing: a mainstream movie in which the hero’s sister had contracted a venereal disease, the hero’s best friend was in love with a sex worker, and the villain was a eunuch who’d channelled all the misery she’d endured into pure hate. And now, after two decades, we have a sequel with no trace of Mahesh Bhatt’s DNA: unless, of course, you count the heroines. Pooja plays a photo on the wall. Alia plays an heiress who wants Ravi to drive her someplace where she can bring down a godman. Makarand Deshpande plays this part like an actor who set out to audition for Shakuni in BR Chopra’s Mahabharat, lost his way in the Thar desert, and ended up somewhere in Mount Kailash.
All that’s okay, but where does the owl come in! Shaant, gadhadhar Bheem! It belongs to Aarya’s boyfriend Vishal (Aditya Roy Kapur), and he has it with him in a cage as he steps out of jail. Say what? Yes, jail. Vishal was arrested while defending Aarya during an attempt on her life. He goes to jail. And when he comes out, he has more stuff than he went in with. He has not just Kumbhkaran, but also a guitar. And a backpack filled with… who knows! Now you see why the owl is a metaphor for the overall badness. It’s a sign that anything goes. Sadak 2 is the kind of movie where Vishal could have stormed out of prison in a golden chariot emblazoned with the insignia of the sun god Ra and you still would be reacting the same way.
Why do Aarya and Vishal fall in love? The answer is a hoot. Why are there so many bland songs that serve no narrative function? Maybe we should ask this question to a film that actually cared. The only pure success of Sadak 2 is that it becomes a powerful tool for anyone who wants to battle nepotism. I mean, imagine this: Mahesh Bhatt’s younger daughter plays the heroine in the sequel to a film which featured Mahesh Bhatt’s older daughter and Sunil Dutt’s son, and here, we also have Siddharth Roy Kapur’s brother and Jisshu Sengupta, son of Bengali actor Ujjwal Sengupta. Heck, even Kumbhkaran is the name of the brother of a legendary villain. One could also make the case for reverse-nepotism, here. Alia Bhatt, being a popular star, perhaps decided to help out her father and sister, in which case Sadak 2 may mark the first instance of nepotism going up the family tree.
What makes you squirm is that this nonsense is going to be dismissed as “masala” by those who don’t know better. A solid twist involving Aarya’s father is not used as the interval point. Ravi sings “Maar diya jaaye ya chhod diya jaaye”, because, apparently, invoking a song from Sadak wasn’t enough, and now he has to go back a couple of decades to a point where screenwriters actually knew how to write big for the screen. The climax features a trishul-impaling, which I have to admit, gives the ensuing death a little more dignity than owl-pecking, though the conceit is way too overwrought for a film this… urban. Besides, no self-respecting masala movie would have this line: “Yeh rishta DELETE ka button dabane se khatam nahin hoga?” As I heard these awful words, I imagined them being given the “rasode mein kaun tha” treatment!
Oh, oh, maybe this line deserves it more. When Aarya goes missing, her father stops eating. Her hysterical stepmother (Priyanka Bose) tells someone (the doctor maybe?), “Jab se yeh gayab hui hai, anna ka ek daana inhone nahin chhua hai.” Apparently, “kuch khaaye nahin hai” is too mundane. You need Mahabharata-era phrases like “anna ka daana”. More hilariously, the man, nearby, is pouring himself a whiskey, which is made of fermented grain, which is — hello! — “anna ka daana”, woman! Your husband is just consuming it straight, is all. I grinned at that, and also at the post-credits thank-you to a consultant neuro-psychiatrist. It gives the feeling that they actually went around and did some research while writing this dreck, though I was heartbroken to see not one consultant owlist being named. Birds have feelings too, you know!
Copyright ©2020 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
ravenus1
September 15, 2020
From the heights of Venice (Film Festival) to Sadak, what a comedown :p
LikeLike
Sri Prabhuram
September 15, 2020
Et tu, BR?! I actually thought that the trailer wasn’t that bad, until the whole subplot about the godman arrived. Then again, there weren’t any owls featured the trailer.
LikeLike
Devarsi Ghosh
September 15, 2020
God, you know what I want? A book of BR’s most hilarious and cruel reviews of irredeemably bad films. I think Roger Ebert had a book of this sort, collecting all the .5 and 1 star reviews. BR, this book will sell like hot cakes if it happens.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pratibha
September 15, 2020
That’s the good thing about bad movies: they can make for good reviews.
LikeLike
Anu Warrier
September 15, 2020
🙂 Poor Alia. She must be muttering Et tu, Brute at her father. This is probably the biggest flop of her career.
LikeLike
abishekspeare
September 15, 2020
The biggest success of this movie is it led to this review
LikeLiked by 3 people
Sri Prabhuram
September 15, 2020
I stand corrected. There was an owl featured in the trailer.
LikeLike
Aman Basha
September 15, 2020
Well, well, is it really this bad? Even worse than Bhai Berozgar Yojana rollouts Race 3 and Dabangg 3? So it did live up to all those dislikes after all. 70 crores for this? Do streaming services even watch the films they buy?
This is perfect proof why Alia did the best thing to her career by not starring in an inhouse production. Vishesh Films hasn’t made a decent film in years and an original in probably 2 decades. In fact, I’ve read reports that they have essentially fooled their co producers and distributors into pumping cash on their recent films. This movie wouldn’t have gotten made if not for Alia, it seems like bad times for her, first Kalank and now this (plus the Hookup song was disappointing). Not to mention the vitrol being thrown on her online.
LikeLike
Vishal
September 15, 2020
Fun review BR – I fell off the chair at ‘owl-aad’- that was hilarious
LikeLike
Shika
September 16, 2020
I LOVED this movie. It was such a mind-boggling disaster that I was able to sit on my couch for two (almost three?) hours and get a kick out of pinpointing every pathetic decision they made.
Gosh bad movies are the most fun things to watch sometimes. I haven’t laughed this much at a movie in a looong time.
LikeLike
brangan
September 16, 2020
Shika: Right? I suspect I will be returning often to this film for laughs. Its badness is at a Monty Python-esque level. I (almost) fell off my chair at so many scenes — like the one where the stepmother smears vermilion on her forehead before confronting her husband. 😀 😀
Actually, I’ve been trying to recall the last time we got THIS big a dud…
RGV’s AAG?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hitu
September 16, 2020
These bastards the bhat family knows only to disrespect hinduism.just because of a few fake babas these bastard bhats want to portray all sadhu saints are frauds.
Mahesh bhat is on a mission to malign hinduism.what can you expect from a lusty tharki old man who didn’t spare her daughter also.
LikeLike
abishekspeare
September 16, 2020
The brilliance of the title alludes to the destination producers will find themselves had this film been released in theaters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Alex John
September 16, 2020
I actually feel bad for the ‘nepotism fighters’ who started a war against a film that needed no war to make it bite the dust.Going by the word of mouth,I wish they had pitted themselves against a movie that could be called bad, at least.
Anyway, laughed hard over the ‘mourned’ part.And over the ‘song’ part.And over the ‘Kumbhkaran’ part.And over a lot of other parts.
Should I say this review was the best part of the movie?
Thanks BR for this piece!
LikeLike
Nisa
September 16, 2020
O. M. G… That was hilarious, I like you owl pun.. I was laughing so hard while reading this.. Kudos to you.. 😉
LikeLike
Raj
September 16, 2020
Sequels are passé.
I wonder if there will be any takers for a spin-off featuring Kumbhakaran and Hedwig.
Harry Potter and the Sadak to Ignominy.
LikeLike
Preeti Sharma
September 16, 2020
You forgot the dialogue “upar wala hamare sath hai is sadak par ”
That was the most hilarious and ridiculous dialogue I have ever heard.
LikeLike
Krisna kc
September 16, 2020
They don’t have creativity and innovation but they just want to make themself as a brand and this won’t happen.
LikeLike
Satya
September 16, 2020
Birds have feelings too, you know!
Yes. They do. When I was having my own “Life of Ram” moment at Lenyadri, I saw a very cute pair of white owls sitting on a branch and being very happy with each other’s company.
I am thankful Bhatt didn’t give Kumbhkaran any companion. If they gave one and they romanced, some idiot would kill him and we would have a Valmiki too (shudders)…
LikeLike
hakimokimo
September 16, 2020
Anyone watched Cabaret ? It was a delayed film and it released last year on Zee5. Pooja Bhatt co-wrote it. Yet to watch Sadak 2 but it is hard to beat that one.
About the recent duds…. Mrs Serial Killer and Namaste England are the ones. Also the new Zanjeer and Himmatwala.
” 70 crores for this? Do streaming services even watch the films they buy? ” it is co-produced by Fox that’s why Disney+hostar acquired it. They had no choice.
LikeLike
alpesh
September 16, 2020
Is Mahesh Bhatt’s legacy genuine or a result of rose tinted nostalgia born out of self promotion and self aggrandising? I do not consider his filmography as a director to be stellar, you take someone like Mani Ratnam who made at least very good films on a consistent basis, with maybe the odd under-whelming film here and there. Bhatt’s filmography is more of the opposite, a film maker of consistently below-average films that were remakes of Hollywood or old hindi films, with the odd highlight dotted around here and there.
His filmography as a producer, in my opinion he is the equivalent of a Hollywood C-grade soft core pornography film producer, who somehow negotiated theatrical releases for films which should have been direct-to-video releases
The comparison to RGV is unfair to RGV, he changed the Telegu film industry with Shiva and the Hindi film industry with Satya. Which makes RGV’s fall from grace much more spectacular.
LikeLike
Aman Basha
September 16, 2020
I think BR might be disappointed that Mahesh Bhatt and Alia Bhatt, both of whom he really seems to like, came up with such a mess. So just to make him and the other Kamal fanboys happy here, your wish is fulfiled, Kamal is finally acting in a film made by a talented new gen film maker only as an actor:
Remembered having a discussion about Kamal and what’s pulling him down these days elsewhere and he seems to have adressed all the complaints there with this one announcement.
LikeLike
At
September 16, 2020
You know Mahesh bhatt is laughing as bad publicity is why people are watching it which may not be the case if it were an average film.
LikeLike
brangan
September 16, 2020
alpesh: There are two things here. A great filmmaker is not necessarily someone who made a series of great films. He could also be a disruptor, like Mahesh Bhatt. At a time a traditional melodrama like MAIN TULSI TERE AANGAN KI was the only way you could show extramarital relationships, he made films like LAHU KE DO RANG and ARTH.
With his 80s films, he essentially urbanised Amitabh’s Angry Young Man. He emphasised restrained performances even though his milieus were the typically overheated ones of the era — so in a way, he a is major connecting link between older and newer Hindi cinema.
As for his films, I genuinely think he was a most interesting filmmaker from MANZILEIN AUR BHI HAIN to AWAARGI, perhaps even SAATHI.
And then, I don’t know what happened. Quantity took over quality, and his films were only occasionally interesting. But still, you’re talking about a decade-and-a-half of a rock-solid (and IMO, very underappreciated) career.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rocky
September 16, 2020
What a hilarious review, maza aa gaya !
Re. – the constant reference to Owl by BR , I think BR wanted to badly write – Ullu ka Pathha , but restrained himself, there I said it , LOL !!
Agree on Bhatt- his movies like Saraansh, Janam, Thikana, LKDR, Sir, DHKMN , Ashiqi and above all Naam are enough to recognize him as a brilliant film maker.
LikeLike
Sandip yadav
September 16, 2020
Yas
LikeLike
awkshwayrd
September 17, 2020
@brangan: There is a masterclass from you buried in the comments here. I’d never heard of any of these movies (MANZILEIN AUR BHI HAIN? AWAARGI? SAATHI?) and I’m a 80’s kid with a very Bollywood-y (or Bombay cinema as you would like it) family. I even have a relative who’s a Mahesh Bhatt fanboy.
I’d always thought of Mahesh Bhatt as the guy who made a few high profile gritty ‘arty’ dramas in the 80’s (Saaransh, Arth) before becoming a Pooja Bhatt employment scheme in the 90’s (I remember Daddy and Dil Hai Ke Manta Nahi and Zakhm of course; I could never sit through Sadak even as a tween). I genuinely thought ‘Saaransh’ was his first movie. And that all successive movies were mostly mined from facets of his affair with Parveen Babi. Googling his filmography now I realize I do dimly recall AWAARGI (probably playing on telly sometime back in the day). What’s insane is that Google informs me he also directed ‘Hum Hain Rahi Pyaar Ke’ which I always thought was directed by Mansoor Khan!
LikeLike
Santa
September 17, 2020
@Rocky: DHKMN was a virtual scene-by-scene copy of Chori Chori, (which itself was inspired from a Hollywood movie, can’t remember exactly if it was Roman Holiday or It Happened One Night?). Agree with the rest of the list, although I wouldn’t be surprised to learn if other movies are rip-offs too given Bhatt’s penchant for liberally lifting from foreign films.
LikeLike
Anamika Chatterjee
September 17, 2020
I was strangely hooked to see the proceedings as the minutes ticked by and the movie went from bad to worse.
Did you bother to wonder about the Ram naam satya hai rant during the climax? I know I should ignore but really trying to fit a reason around it.
And the owl in jail…why did you have to point it out? There goes a few more brain cells trying to figure THAT too.
Such a fun movie.
LikeLike
Madan
September 17, 2020
“I’d always thought of Mahesh Bhatt as the guy who made a few high profile gritty ‘arty’ dramas in the 80’s (Saaransh, Arth) before becoming a Pooja Bhatt employment scheme in the 90’s ” – Between those two phases was the Mahesh Bhatt going commercial phase with Naam, Kaash, Jurm while still staying on the crime beat. Do those films compare to Mani’s best work? Probably not. But there are lots of people talking about Mani all the time. There aren’t even as many people talking about Mahesh Bhatt as there are to talk about RGV or even Subhash Ghai (who was always a commercial and fairly mediocre director even at his best). That Pooja Bhatt’s demented daddy image has overshadowed his work so much that nobody seems to remember that this man could make great films once upon a time.
Howlarious review. I second what Devarsi said. Pl make a BR Scissorhands compilation of all such reviews that redlined the snarkometer.
LikeLike
Rocky
September 17, 2020
@Santa – Mahesh Bhatt is like Pritam , Pritam once famously said he is not a music composer but a music designer.
also – Nakal key liye bhee akal lagtee hai is true for both of them.
LikeLike
Ankit
September 21, 2020
This is what I love about Bharadwaj. He is charmingly mean and sarcastic in his reviews of bad movies as well. Only good thing about the movie is this review about it. 😜
LikeLike