(by Madhusudhan N)
(Spoilers ahead)
The opening scene of Soorarai Pottru reminded me of MS Dhoni: The untold story. The latter began with Dhoni walking out to bat in the 2011 Cricket World Cup finals. The film then cut to flashback that narrated the cricketer’s journey from the time he was bornand comes back to the opening scene much later. We all know what happened there – one of India’s biggest achievements in International Cricket and stand out moment for MS Dhoni, the cricketer.
Similarly in Soorarai Pottru, we are forced right into the middle of action – a pilot is trying to land his aircraft and is running out of fuel. He is denied the clearance to land, a breach of protocol as we’re told. Maaran (Suriya) grabs the mike from the airport officer and asks his pilot to land his aircraft at a different location. He rushes to the spot, breaching all security and arrives just as the flight encounters a crash landing. The film cuts to a flashback. I thought this is where the climax of the film would come to. An underdog entrepreneur finally lands his aircraft despite stiff opposition. Like in Martin Scorsese’s The Aviator, where the protagonist’s success was in his giant war plane finally taking off when all odds were stacked against him.
To our surprise, we find out that this was just one of the many hardships Maaran had to face and he had many more coming. Maaran doesn’t get any payoff until much later in the film, barely minutes before it ends. The film has many such delightful subversions that keep us invested. This is a story of a man who worked his ass off. His toil and relentless pursuit of his ambition was crucial to his success. He wouldn’t have it any other way. There are no convenient coincidences. Maaran wasn’t born with all the greatness.
There are many other surprises. More delightful of those is the relationship between Maaran and his wife, Sundari a.k.a. Bommi (Aparna Balamurali). This is a marriage of shared ambitions, desire for breaking norms, entrepreneurship and intellectual compatibility. I was relieved that there are no forced “cute” scenes. Aparna Balamurali plays Bommi with a swagger you seldom see in heroines in Tamil Cinema. She earns more than her husband and her success is as important to her as her husband’s. The constraints of commercial cinema means she would still get lesser screen time but it is to the writers’ and actor’s credit that this character registers beautifully.
There are some bad surprises too. The first half frantically moves from one scene to the other that for a while, I was wondering if I was watching a Hari film. I wished at least some scenes breathed a little more. What prompted Maaran to join the Air Force after leaving his village? We see what triggered the thought of wanting to build a cost effective airline in Maaran. But we don’t see how the thought evolves into action. I could understand why the theatrical version would be this way. The filmmakers seem to think audiences want faster screenplay. But in OTT, you are allowed to take your time to build. Couldn’t they have slightly re-edited the film?
I could also have lived without the annoyingly one-note villains. When the rest of the film is well rooted in realism, this shift to the AR Murugadoss brand of simplicity is jarring. It doesn’t help that we keep getting badly accented Tamil out of these non-Tamil speaking actors. Paresh Rawal plays this thankless role only to be watered down further by the dubbing. I am still waiting for the day when corporate greed in Tamil Cinema would get the best reflection – far more subtle and organized. Not using caricatures uttering lines like “pathu rooba pocket la illadhavan nalla thoongarana!”. It remided me again of The Aviator, where the “corporate villain” played by Alec Baldwin could efficiently fit into the tamil cinema masala universe.
There were many such occasions when I went back to The Aviator. The line “Vaanam enna avan appan veettu sotha” instantly reminded me of “He owns Pan AM, he owns Congress, he owns the senate but he does not own the sky”. Howard Hughes in that film was a victim of his government’s favoritism and so is Maaran, in very similar ways. They both fight their way out of corruption and blatant abuse of power and authority. While The Aviator ends as a cautionary tale, Soorarai Pottru has a rousingly hopeful ending, staying true to its mainstream spirit.
The writers exercise tremendous restraint in mass-ifying their protagonist, and it is mirrored in Suriya’s performance. There is a terrific moment right before the interval when Maaran is pushed out of Paresh’s office and Paresh looks at him with contempt from the top floor, with a glass wall between them. An agitated Maaran picks a fire extinguisher to throw at him. I was expecting to see the cylinder break the glass door, with Maaran symbolically telling his oppressor that he will break every single barrier no matter how hard he is pushed. It turned out to be one heck of a mass moment in my head that I practically imagined myself in the theatre screaming my lungs out.
But Maaran is immediately grabbed by the security and is barely able to throw. The cylinder doesn’t hit the glass and falls on the floor. He is pushed to the floor and can hardly move. Paresh continues to look at him with contempt. You can practically hear the writers telling us “Not yet”. Maaran doesn’t get his due until the very end, making his success far more impactful. When Maaran grabs a corrupt officer’s neck, you see it as an honest man’s reaction and not of mass hero. The build up to this scene justifies this reaction.
The film scores high on emotional content.There’s a tragic irony of a teacher who, all his life has taught his villagers to write, barely able to write in his deathbed. This is a minor supporting character in the film. But even he gets closure before his death. And his presence is felt in some of the film’s key moments. There is another lovely moment when forgiveness comes in the form of a childbirth affirmed with the child carrying a key physical characteristic.
Even at places where the writing lets the film down, the performances compensate. Oorvasi is a sensation playing Suriya’s mother, a woman carrying the weight of a strained relationship between her husband and her son. She breathes life into a character that could have easily turned into a loud weeping machine. Watch her change her voice from steady to trembling in a matter of seconds over a phone conversation. The scene itself comes out of nowhere and we are dropped right into it. But Oorvasi sells it.When she breaks down, she also breaks your heart.
Suriya’s layered performance channelizes anger, helplessness, desperation and a flawed sense of optimism. Even his rage is accompanied with restraint. I got gooseflesh in the scene involving Maaran trying to meet the president. In many ways, his character is an extension of Madhavan’s in Irudhi Suttru. Both men equally possessed by ambition and the need to break out of systemic oppression. Suriya’s best acting moments in the film (there are many, many great acting moments) come when he shows vulnerability. Watch him in the scene where he asks his wife for a small loan. There is uncertainty, a fear of humiliation and a rare instance of male ego arising in an otherwise equal relationship.
When Maaran finally succeeds at the end, there is no slow motion walk. There are tears, gratitude and a genuine sense of being humbled. It’s a victory of unconditional support from a wife, mother, colleagues, the villagers and a father’s dying wish. The writers allow each of these characters their own moment without making it all about their star hero. It’s also a victory of a woman who quietly wrote her own success story.
In real life though, Air Deccan had to eventually sell its operations to Kingfisher. But Sudha Kongara is interested in the story of a man who dreamed of running a low cost airline and fought the bureaucracy to achieve it. She stays true to her vision and the result is a dignified masala film with just enough bite elevated by knockout performances.
Madan
November 17, 2020
You talk about the writers exercising tremendous restraint in mass-ifying the protagonist. I think that is the crux and how you react to it will define your reaction to the film. For me, the prior knowledge of it being based on Air Deccan made the mass-ifying unpalatable. The story simply didn’t fit into a MASS arc. I could easily see it succeeding with the Guru treatment or something like Panga. In the first case, while Mani glorified Ambani a lot, at least the story had enough breathing space to develop a character arc. In Panga, the treatment was linear and predictable, a typical underdog-living-her-dream story. But at least it works while it lasts (Dangal is likewise).
I THINK even with changing the castes and all to pander to the BO, you could still have had a better film just by matching the sequence more to real life. We know that Gopinath didn’t jump right into the airline biz. He built up a good helicopter service and developed his own political contacts through it when he got into the airline section. You could have had Maaran’s humble background shown in brief and then cutting to the present where he runs a helicopter business but nurtures a dream of running an airline that people from his village could afford to fly in. It would still be an inspiring story (and the story of Air Deccan with all its executional failures is still an inspiring one) while also not requiring so much suspension of disbelief.
The way the movie was made, the last half hour felt like the Baahubali scene where Mahendra Baahubali catapults himself into the fortress after initially failing but bloated far beyond the length of that scene in Baahubali. You just saw the airline facing setback after setback without much of an insight into what Maaran was doing this time to make the airline succeed. It felt like they had to show the airline succeeding just to be able to wrap up the movie.
I could never get beyond this lack of a coherent narrative arc. So even if it wasn’t Vedhalam or Bigil, the mass beats received way too much priority so that the film became all about those beats, those emotions and sentiments and the very substantial backstory was diluted to the core as well as distorted to fit these beats. It was an opportunity missed.
Suriya nor the director wouldn’t have known when they made the film that it would have had to be released on OTT but had it been made with integrity and respect for the source material, you could have had a product practically made for OTT with tremendous crossover appeal. This, hand in hand, points to the lack of vision on the part of many Tamil filmmakers. Air Deccan was a nationwide success story but they chose to reduce it a purely Tamil story (almost presenting it as if all flights left or went to Chennai alone). Where Rajamouli retained a Telugu core but made Baahubali for all of India to watch. Somebody needs to tell these filmmakers that Tamil culture is way deeper than this amma/appa/pondaati sentiment and they should have the courage to let go of it and make a bigger and bolder film instead.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Srinivas R
November 17, 2020
Wonderfully written, probably reflects majority view about the movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
madhusudhan194
November 17, 2020
@Madan: I think the intent was always to make a mass masala film. And a masala film is primarily about the emotional beats, right? Guru, at least when I watch it today, is no less simplistic than SP and mainly works because of the emotional / sentimental beats. Guru glorifies its protagonist a lot more than SP does. But I do agree that the character arcs in Guru are much better.
“You could have had Maaran’s humble background shown in brief and then cutting to the present where he runs a helicopter business but nurtures a dream of running an airline that people from his village could afford to fly in. It would still be an inspiring story (and the story of Air Deccan with all its executional failures is still an inspiring one) while also not requiring so much suspension of disbelief.” – Yes, but that would be in the territory of say, The Aviator. Which doesn’t fit into the mass masala template. This was clearly meant for a theatre audience. Plus, it’s the choice of the writers to decide what to pick and what to leave out, right? But with the ones they pick, do they do justice is what I was coming from. I haven’t read the book nor was I aware of Capt. Gopinath’s personal and professional background except the broad highlights. So, it didn’t bother me that they deviated from real life / the book. If Capt. Gopinath’s tweets are anything to go by, they seem to have captured the essence of his character and I feel that’s good enough for a fictional story based on real life.
I agree that in SP, the story is definitely mass-ified. Just not the protagonist which is a welcome change. And I think it is done reasonably well. Had it released in theatres and made money, it could have paved way for more and better films.
LikeLike
Madan
November 17, 2020
“Plus it’s the choice of the writers to decide what to pick and what to leave” – Sure, but that also affects the shape of the film they’re making. I am sure it would be a commercial success. That’s not the point. Or rather, that is the point. If that alone is going to be the remit of their ambitions, Tamil filmmakers are going to miss more such opportunities. There was an opportunity here to play a different game than to forcefit a pan India story of an underdogs’ battle against the odds into that of a Tamil mass vehicle. Unfortunately the makers played safe by making the latter choice.
LikeLiked by 2 people
shaviswa
November 17, 2020
Agree with @madan. The movie fell short on narrating the main storyline and resorted to emotional gimmicks. Actually, in my opinion, a shoddily written movie. Very disappointing.
I agree again with Madan when he says while the story is all about failure, failure, failure…success, the interesting part would be what the hero does between the failures. What changes does he make in his strategy, what course corrections does he resort to, how does a failure leads to him learning something that helps him remove an obstacle…!!! I could get nothing on this from the movie. At one point I was like…ok guys, let this contraption fly now and we can get done with it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
gnanaozhi
November 17, 2020
I have already laid threadbare why this movie sucks as a biopic but if it were a standalone masala movie, I would have definitely given it an above average rating.
Iruvar is imo the only biopic in Tamil cinema that is not massified, stays true to the people it is based on and happens to be pure class.
What didn’t work for me in SP,
1) A horribly forced class angle. I fly a lot (pre Covid) and definitely have had blue collar workers board flights, in some cases even international flights (mostly from the GCC) and literally not once have these passengers been frowned upon or anything. The whole airport scene, his meetings with the Mallya and Goyal standins was pure Tamil masala nonsense.
2) anti corporate messaging – Tamil cinema needs to get out of the irrational and stupid binary of “corporate bad, villagers and poverty are good”.
3) needless shifting of the caste of the protagonist, maybe because Surya was scared of offending his fans? This very fact exposes the hypocrisy of Kollywood.
The sad part is, if it was a truly intelligent movie, the real story of the real Gopinath is stirring just the same.
Born into lower middle class obscurity in a remote part of Karnataka, clearing the IMA, fighting in Bangladesh 1971, starting a hotel, expanding them, starting a helicopter and later plane chartering company and then finally Deccan Air, rising to a high in 2007 when he sold a stake in Deccan for a cool $150 mn, and then the real villainous twist where Mallya who came in as a strategic investor turned hawk who was out to do a hostile takeover (he succeeded), the humiliating battle in the courts where even his house was repossessed, fighting and losing an election to now starting a second chapter with his freight carrier.
Instead we get Bigil lite.
We already have intelligent filmmakers (Nalan Kumaraswamy, Karthik Subburaj are just a few) making intelligent movies. Sudha K the director of this movie would also fall into this category with her previous movies but here Surya the star speaks.
LikeLike
vijay
November 17, 2020
for whatever it is worth they do show Surya changing strategy, getting inspired from small birds flying, and coming up with idea to fly converted small planes between small tier 3 cities. He also gets help along the way from the airforce men.The scenes post his father’s death with Urvashi berating him, breaking down etc annoyed me slightly. It could have been slightly trimmed. Also the software bug at the very end and the immediate resolution felt a bit anti-climatic . A mass film should have shown some scenes where initially no passenger turns up and slowly they trickle in filling up the seats just when Surya is about to give up and then he gets similiar news from other airstrips.. That software bug seemed thrust in as a last minute add-on.
LikeLiked by 2 people
vijay
November 17, 2020
I think Guru benefitted a bit by being made in Hindi primarily. If it was a Tamil-first film it would have also suffered. I think Sudha had to tremendously fictionalze the story to set it in a semi-rrual Tamil milieu. You have to look at this as Maaran’s story and not as Gopinath’s.
On the contrary, if you take Mani’s Raavanan, if you did not know what Ramayan was or had’nt read it then the movie scenes make very little sense. Mani relied a lot on the audience’s prior knowledge of the epic to fashion those scenes. Whereas here, if you had’nt read up much on Gopinath and all you knew was he was some guy who managed to fly low cost airlines, then I think the comparisons wont bother as much
LikeLiked by 2 people
Madan
November 17, 2020
@gnanaozhi: That para where you list the milestones of Gopinath himself…exactly, this is what I don’t get. What was so goddamn risky about adapting his actual life story to film? Uh, any IPR issues? Can’t be because the opening credits mention that the film is based on Simply Fly. I want to ask what part of the film indeed is based on Simply Fly. If you have changed EVERYTHING other than low cost airline, what remains of the source material. The lack of confidence to even grab such low hanging fruit is disappointing.
LikeLike
madhusudhan194
November 17, 2020
“needless shifting of the caste of the protagonist, maybe because Surya was scared of offending his fans? This very fact exposes the hypocrisy of Kollywood.” – Is there any scene / anything in the film that establishes the protagonist as belonging to a certain caste? The class difference aspect is abundantly clear. But, I don’t remember a single reference to caste in the film except the line “I want to break the class and caste barrier”. Am I missing something?
LikeLike
Srinivas R
November 17, 2020
anti corporate messaging – Tamil cinema needs to get out of the irrational and stupid binary of “corporate bad, villagers and poverty are good”.
Agree with every word of this. Especially because TamilNadu is a state where capitalism, for all it’s faults, has actually helped lifting the standard of many semi urban and rural people. Be it the Tirupur garment factories, Coimbatore engg companies or the IT boom in chennai. I am very confused and the audience cheers this corporates are bad message.
LikeLike
madhusudhan194
November 18, 2020
anti corporate messaging – Tamil cinema needs to get out of the irrational and stupid binary of “corporate bad, villagers and poverty are good” – More than the anti-corporate messaging, it is about how the filmmakers execute it. I think it was beautifully done is Karthik Subbaraj’s criminally underappreciated Mercury.
We have everyday stories of corporate giants taking people / its customers / governments / small businesses for a ride. So there is no reason why there shouldn’t be corporate villains on films, whichever language the film is made in. Even “The Aviator” had a big bad corporate villain. A more sensible portrayal that actually reflects some understanding of how corporate giants work is lacking in our films.
LikeLiked by 1 person