By Karthik Amarnath
The Greatest Show on Earth, Cecile B. Demille’s lavish 1952 film about a grand traveling circus opens with these lines:
We bring you the circus. The pied piper, whose magic tunes lead children of all ages, from 6 to 60, into a tinsel and spun-candy world of reckless beauty and mounting laughter, whirling thrills, the rhythm, excitement and grace of daring and blaring and dance, of high-stepping horses and high-flying stars.
If we change “circus” to “cinema” and “tunes” to “frames”, then those could be the opening lines for a film about the grand medium of cinema. In fact, they almost are. The power of cinema is at the heart of Steven Spielberg’s most wonderful new film, The Fabelmans, which opens with a six year old Sammy Fabelman about to watch his first ever movie, and it just happens to be The Greatest Show on Earth. The pun is intended, if not by me, then certainly by the film.
Such is Spielberg’s devotion to the medium that his awe for its power colors every frame. Each shot looks like a painterly composition, every movement like it was punctiliously choreographed. Characters are not so much captured as they are caressed by the camera which switches between subjects and compositions with a poetic grace. Guillermo Del Toro in his twitter thread on West Side Story put this succinctly when he wrote “Steven Spielberg makes the camera dance.”
But such is Spielberg’s mastery over the medium. In a pre-release interview for The Fablemans, Seth Rogen said that Spielberg has an inhuman ability to build a scene. If Spielberg were indeed a superhuman, then the semi-autobiographical The Fabelmans, is his origins story. Seth Rogen plays his uncle Ben (Uncle Bennie to be exact), and even gets a scene where he tells young Sammy that he must use his (filmmaking) powers for a good purpose. There’s also a beautiful scene where Sammy is gifted his powers. Sammy’s mother, Mitzy Fabelman is standing in front of a row of broken TVs, holding a camera in her hand. Sammy is not in the frame. He’s crouching down, but when he turns around, we see all the broken TV screens come to life with his reflection.
Mitzy gives Sammy the camera so he could recreate the famous train crash scene from The Greatest Show on Earth. The scene had given him nightmares, and she says he can film it and watch it over and over again without destroying anything real. She says it would give him control over the train wreck (which we will see later is a metaphor for the larger “story” of the movie). But when he gets the camera from her, she’s crouched down and he’s standing tall. What we see in his big blue eyes is beyond anything she’s told him. What he’s holding is not just a medicine for fear but the magic of films.
In the beginning, though, Sammy’s films are filled with shock and horror. They feature zombies and mummies, with his sisters doubling up as actors. The first piece of visual magic happens in a stagecoach western that Sammy shoots as a teenager. Sammy is unhappy with a particular scene that just doesn’t feel authentic to him. But then he has an idea to let a small amount of light shine through the film, adding a touch of truth to his make-believe world, which makes all the difference in that moment.
The scene where Sammy has this realization is itself a piece of visual magic. We hear a piano piece being played, and although we don’t see the player at first, the camera slowly moves up the piano and we see long, manicured fingernails tapping the keys. When the camera reaches the top of the piano, we see Mitzy’s reflection on the board. It is a moment of visual poetry and a poignant echo of the earlier scene where Mitzy gives birth to Sammy’s artistic life. The piano shot is a reflection of Mitzy’s sacrifice of her own career as a concert pianist.
In that twitter thread on West Side Story, Guillermo Del Toro marveled at the “impossible brain-surgery level precision” in so many of Spielberg’s shots. We see in The Fabelmans that Sammy gets the artistry from his mother, but the technical precision and ingenuity is from his father, Burt Fabelman. Burt is a pioneering electrical engineer, instrumental in advancing computer technology at companies like GE and IBM. In the very first scene of The Fabelmans, Burt uses science to explain the moving pictures to Sammy. He talks about persistence of vision, about how we’re only shown twenty four pictures in a second, but our mind fills in the rest to make it feel real.
The science of persistence of vision may explain how movies work for us, but the art of filling gaps with our mind’s eye is why the movies work for us, and why they turn into, as Mitzy tells Sammy in that opening scene, “dreams that we will never forget.” As Sammy grows as a filmmaker, its this art that he learns to toy with. The movies he makes are all soundless, and most of the time, we see him with an editing machine and little strips of film stuck on the table, the collection of little visual moments, that he snaps, splices, and sticks together to create his motion pictures. Through images alone he learns to control, package and create emotion. But even beyond that, he learns to play with perception, to toy with “truth.”
If this film is about one thing, its about the power of moving images, the power of those images to move us. The most telling segment in the latter half of the movie, is when Sammy is forced, against his wishes, to convince a girl in his high school about something he’d seen. He talks to her and fails. She sees right through his lie. But later he uses real footage he shot on a trip to make a film that changes her perception. The telling moment though is when Sammy is asked later why he made the film that way, and he doesnt have an answer. Did he just want to complete a task he started? Did he want to feel connected with someone who hurt him? Was he exorcizing his own emotion? Or was he using his power to manipulate someone else’s? What does a film really do for the filmmaker?
There’s two striking straits that we see in Sammy. One, at the most challenging moments in his life, like breakups, divorce or death, we dont see him emote. In fact, his strongest emotions are triggered only when he sees something unfold on a screen. Second, he needs someone else to feel that emotion, he needs an audience. At a most devastating moment for his family, he needs his sister to sit by him to watch a film that he’s editing.
Steven Spielberg has been open about how his own childhood has informed and influenced so many of his movies. Whether they’re about man-eating sharks, invading aliens, or emancipation of slavery, its no surprise that his films retain a childlike curiosity and wonderment at the world. We often see the most extraordinary events in his films through the window of an ordinary family. Thats one of the reasons that his films are so widely accessible. But with The Fabelmans, he’s turned the camera around, and made a deeply personal film, where the focus is solely on the family, on a childhood, on his childhood. The Fablemans is an intense and intimate lens to look inside the filmmaker, and understand what makes him the magician that he is. But more importantly, it tries to get at what films really mean to him? And the answer isn’t something easily spelt in words, but it’s captured in the glorious closing image of the film. Thats the moment that we feel the filmmaker’s joy of just being, in those empty spaces between the frames, and facing the endless possibilities that lie in and between moments.
The most fascinating thing about The Fablemans is how little the film deviates from the actual events in Spielberg’s life. To quote from a Vanity Fair piece:
The story of The Fabelmans is the Spielberg family’s history with just the lightest touch of fiction, mainly through the reordering of events for dramatic effect. “Generally speaking, there’s not a scene in the film that didn’t happen at some point in my life,” Spielberg says.
And yet, according to Tony Kushner (who co-wrote the script with Spielberg), at no point did they ever consider making it an actual biopic, or calling it “The Spielbergs.” Spielberg said that Kushner urged him to “tell a story based on the real people and real events that influenced the rest of my life,” which became “a character-driven story that I can only hope will be relatable to anyone who ever grew up in a complicated family. And there’s no such thing as a family that isn’t complicated.”
But by turning fact to fable, not only have they turned a very specific story to something universal, but they’ve also made a film that presents the medium of cinema like it’s the greatest show on earth.
brangan
December 26, 2022
Thanks for this piece, Karthik. I just SO want to see this film on a big screen.
For my generation, Spielberg was the Nolan/ Fincher / Whatever — a mainstream artist who made films with big audiences in mind. And, like Mani Ratnam, even the “faults” (small or big) in his films come from this aspect — trying to make very personal movies for a large public.
But even today, I don’t see many people approaching Spielberg’s commitment to telling a story through the camera, practically pulling us into the screen. I did not like WEST SIDE STORY, but it’s one of the greatest example of what a director/cinematographer do. I always tell people that if you want to know what a director does, watch THE POST. What an amazingly dynamic staging/telling of a wholly dialogue-driven story!
Okay, I’ll shut up here 🙂
PS: Once upon a time, I used to collect all articles about Spielberg. I’d cut them out from magazines etc. That file must still be around somewhere 🙂
LikeLike
brangan
December 26, 2022
Oh, and lovely title.
LikeLike
Madan
December 26, 2022
Wonderful write up. Sad this film sank without a trace. I didn’t even know Spielberg had a film out this year!
LikeLiked by 1 person
hari prasad
December 26, 2022
Speaking of Mani and Spielberg , just like how people generalize Mani as a ” romantic director” while he made movies in different genres , Spielberg too often gets generalized as this ” brammaanda iyakkunar” that directed Jaws , Raiders of the Lost Ark and Jurassic Park.
I watched Duel recently on YouTube, he made a compelling movie out of a simple premise; a random truck chasing a random car…
Even Schindler’s List gets overlooked , that’s sad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Karthik
December 26, 2022
Thanks, BR. I dont think we’re that far apart, generation-wise. For me, Spielberg was the first Hollywood director that I started “following”, and his movies have always worked for me. I know for a lot of Spielberg fans, Jaws/Raiders of the Lost Ark are the definitive Spielberg films. I love, love, those films, but still its the Catch Me If you Can, Bridge of Spies (and now The Fabelmans) Spielberg that I cant get enough of. Also, I am a sucker for sentiment (I even liked War Horse).
Did The Fabelmans not release in India yet? I read somewhere that the release date was supposed to be in mid December.
Madan: Thanks. I had watched the trailer of this film in summer, and since then, had been looking forward to watching it in the theatre. There were only three people at our screening (and thats including my wife and me). But the film was so deeply personal, that the experience was just perfect.
LikeLike
KayKay
December 26, 2022
“For my generation, Spielberg was the Nolan/ Fincher / Whatever — a mainstream artist who made films with big audiences in mind”
Couldn’t haver said it better!
“But even today, I don’t see many people approaching Spielberg’s commitment to telling a story through the camera, practically pulling us into the screen”
Damn straight!
3 directors from my formative years of movie watching are Spielberg, Ridley Scott and Paul Verhoeven. All of whom have a visual aesthetic few directors can match. While Scott has of late diluted his grand visuals with some pretty sub-par material (a return to his “Alien” franchise was supremely misguided) and Verhoeven has always been a little too edgy for some sections of the mainstream audiences, Spielberg’s impact on Blockbuster Film-making cannot and should not be ignored. The Man was the Nolan/Michael Bay/Roland Emmerich/Denis Villeneuve of his time! But it’s become sadly fashionable in some quarters to dump on directors of a certain era. I see this happening with Mani as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ashok
December 26, 2022
Check out Terri Gross’s interview with Spielberg. Terri is considered to be one of the best interviewers for the way she personalizes the conversation:
https://www.npr.org/2022/11/08/1135127543/steven-spielberg
LikeLike
vijay
December 27, 2022
The Post was terrific. Nolan is no Spielberg, he has a long ways to go..Cant think of any director from current generation who could make big movies as diverse as Jurassic, Schindler, Saving Ryan in the same decade with such results..Or even the 2000s with Catch me, Terminal, minority report, Munich within 3-4 years..His Duel which he must have done when he was barely in his twenties would put a lot of current OTT thrillers to shame, especially those ‘original’ Netlix-made thrillers
LikeLiked by 1 person
hari prasad
December 28, 2022
Trivia that everyone knows : The most popular Spielberg movie of all time which is Jurassic Park and arguably his best movie Schindler’s List , both released in 1993.
I mean this guy gave us both chalk and cheese at the same year and he won the freaking Oscars for both movies , which is a feat to behold.
LikeLike
baradwajchodu
December 29, 2022
@vijay bhosdike comparison karna jaroori hai kya Nolan aur Spielberg ke beech mein, behenchod desi kabhi nahi sudhrenge, ek ki tareef karenge aur doosre ki burai
LikeLike
brangan
December 29, 2022
Dear BC, here is a non-desi site comparing Spielberg and Nolan:
“Christopher Nolan is not of the caliber or status of a Steven Spielberg quite yet but the potential is certainly there…”
https://vocal.media/geeks/christopher-nolan-is-the-spielberg-of-the-21st-century
And here is the New York Times:
““Tenet” dazzles the senses, but it does not move the heart — a criticism common to all of Nolan’s original films. “
LikeLike
hari prasad
January 13, 2023
LikeLiked by 1 person