By Sudharsanan Sampath
SPOILER ALERT:
I watched an exceptional film last week. I don’t know how to talk about this film yet, so I decided to write about it.
I watch a lot of films. Some entertain me, like the blockbusters, popcorn films that beg you to witness them on the big screen. Some, I forget as soon as I walk out of the theater. Some make a deep and lasting impact, and some … only a rare few, earn a permanent place in my subconscious abyss. Sometimes I don’t even understand those films. Films like Tarkovsky’s Mirror, or Stalker, or Fellini’s 8½. I watched a film last week that found its way to my subconscious.
Nanpakal Nerathu Mayakkam, this title roughly translates to: A mid-afternoon nap or more specifically, a mid-afternoon drowsiness.
Before talking about this film, just keep in mind that there are spoilers ahead. Not that it matters. It wouldn’t take away anything from the film.
The film is directed by Lijo Jose Pelissery, a filmmaker who is quickly becoming one of my favorites, as he often deals with existential themes with a good dose of surrealism.
The film stars one of my favorite actors Mamooty. At the ripe age of 70, he is choosing scripts that wouldn’t see the light of the day without a big star attached to it.

So, what’s the story?
A group of Malayali theater artists from Kerala, travel through rural Tamilnadu after their play. Our protagonist James, a cranky family man. There are a lot of things that he dislikes. He dislikes Tamil music, he dislikes Tamil food, he prefers old Malayalam songs. He is anxious to get back to his home. Their bus whirls past forests and fields. It’s a lazy afternoon, and everyone is asleep on the bus. Suddenly James wakes up, asks the driver to stop the bus and gets off. He just walks into the nearby field.
James walks like he’s familiar with the place, and eventually he walks into a small village. He goes to a house, and starts speaking in Tamil, a language he previously didn’t know and disliked. He starts behaving like another man, a man called Sundaram, who disappeared from that house, and from that village, 2 years ago. He might have been dead. Not one person in the village knows what happened to Sundaram, not even his family.
James walks, talks and acts like Sundaram, this Tamil man who is a complete stranger to James and his team. What happened? Is it a classic case of possession? Is James possessed by Sundaram’s ghost? Or is it some kind of personality disorder? The film doesn’t provide you with easy answers. What does it provide then? … Life.
Many years ago, I was travelling on a Greyhound bus. From Toronto to somewhere in the Canadian north. It was the middle of the night. Everyone around me was sleeping. All the lights were off. I was looking out of the window into the cold winter’s night. After long stretches of darkness, the bus would pass by sleepy small towns.
I would see distant homes, and streetlamps. Then the bus would quickly move on to empty fields and ravines. Then, another small town. I would often think about the people in those small towns. What were their lives like? They were probably sleeping in their houses. What else would one do at 2 am? Do they somehow know that there’s this stranger, on a moving bus, looking at their town, thinking about them? I didn’t know. But all I was left with was this feeling of nostalgia.
That’s exactly the feeling that this film offers. It doesn’t offer resolution. It doesn’t even offer a story, in a traditional sense. It offers this feeling, a longing sense of nostalgia. Not just for the past, but also for the lives we’d never get to live. A longing for some kind of existential connection, which cannot ever be described accurately.
Of course, I connected with this film on another level. I grew up in a very small town in Tamilnadu. There were a handful of houses, a nearby forest, peanut and rice fields, and a distant hill. Oh, and a lake. Life was slow. We had a cow and a calf. Our family delivered milk to our neighbors.
When I walked around at night, moonlight was my only companion. I occasionally hear distant TV from someone’s house. Sometimes it felt like my town was the only community in the whole universe. A lot of the time was spent under the starry night sky. It was a quiet life.
This film showcases life in one such small village, and it took me right back to my childhood. Everything on screen was heartachingly familiar.
This film also talks about journeys. Both literal and metaphorical. At first, I was going to say that this film talks about death. But what is death, if not a journey.
First, the theater artists are on a journey to get back to their home. Then James gets off the bus and goes off on his own journey to the village, a journey to become Sundaram.
James’ friends have no choice but to follow him on his journey. A character even quips, how if not for James, they wouldn’t have had any idea about the existence of this rural village and its people, and how the villagers wouldn’t have had any idea of the existence of this theater group. They would have gone on to live their whole lives, without meeting or knowing each other.
Then the characters are on a literal journey to chase James, all through the village as he goes on about his new life. Even the village dog goes on a journey at the end, chasing his master as the film comes to an end.
And what about Sundaram? The non-existent protagonist. Is the whole film, a journey that his soul goes through, just to see his family once more, just to go about his daily chores one last time, or sleep in his house one last time? We don’t know. But the most haunting scene in the film is when we get to see the real Sundaram. I’ll just leave it at that.
As an aspiring filmmaker this film gave me strength. Strength to trust my subconscious mind, while writing my script. Strength to not over analyze or think about what an audience will or will not like. Strength to serve my art. In my opinion, this film is on par with any of Tarkovsky’s, Bergman’s or Fellini’s work.
Well, you made it to the end of my rant. All I can say is, watch the film. Your conscious mind may or may not like the film, but your subconscious mind will thank you.
***
I made a video out of this essay too.
brangan
February 4, 2023
A fantastic film indeed. Thanks for this, Sudha. I hope to have my own review up soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vishal Y
February 4, 2023
In this era of supposed plenty, choosing what to watch is daunting when one wants to make good use of time which after all is finite.
Which is why, thank you for this. I deliberately do not watch outside of whatever makes it to the big screen yet (for a multitude of reasons about which I should write a blog post here). But when I do venture outside the big screen some day, I’d really like to choose well and have some list of sorts lying in wait !
P. S. No I didn’t read your entire post, just about enough from the beginning to get a feel, the rest will only be after I watch 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Karthik
February 4, 2023
It doesn’t offer resolution. It doesn’t even offer a story, in a traditional sense. It offers this feeling
That’s the best kind of film.
Lovely write-up. Look forward to watching this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Voldemort
February 4, 2023
Very beautifully written, Sudharasanan. You are a very evocative writer.
I would often think about the people in those small towns. What were their lives like? They were probably sleeping in their houses. What else would one do at 2 am? Do they somehow know that there’s this stranger, on a moving bus, looking at their town, thinking about them? I didn’t know. But all I was left with was this feeling of nostalgia*
I relate to this very well. Whenever I go on train journeys I love sitting in the window seat and watching the train pass by villages and cities, crop fields and barren lands, and tiny houses with no other houses nearby, and wonder how life would be for all these different folks. It’s a very meditative and humbling activity.
I was probably living under a rock – I hadn’t heard of this film, I now can’t wait to watch it, will come back to this thread and reread after I catch it. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sudha
February 4, 2023
@BR – Thanks for featuring it here BR. Can’t wait to read your review of this film.
@Voldermont – Yes, the lone house in the midst of a field is such a familiar Indian train imagery. Especially at night time, with one 60 watts bulb lighting the porch.
LikeLike
Aravindan R
February 8, 2023
Very well written Sudha. Happy to know this film gave you strength as an aspiring film maker. Best wishes to you!
LikeLike
vijay
February 9, 2023
Sudha, ambiguity is fine to a certain extent. for instance, even if I don’t know how Mammooty behaved the way he did and transformed to Sundaram suddenly that’s fine. Because in these type of films that’s not the point anyways. Its not a literal story. The problem I have with some of these films( not this particular one which I have’nt seen but in general) is if I dont get a measure of the theme the director is trying to address or what does he want to convey by making these choices, that’s when it can end up unsatisfying. I have’nt see this film but multiple reviews have talked about everything from an afternoon siesta hangover to soul swapping to whatever but i still don’t see a cogent read as to what was the point of the film really. if it was just Sundaram’s soul taking over James’s for some time, for closure, then the bus could have stopped at midnight somewhere near his village. why is it titled an afternoon nap then? if it was about the James’s character being ‘punished’ and made to live like Sundaram (like how Bill Murray’s character lives the same day again and again in Groundhog day until he learns gratitude and becomes aware enough to not be a self-serving jerk) then it could have well been shown in a different way than this bizarre Korean thriller type manner. Or like in BR’s review if its about how we are all just actors playacting certain roles, then again then where does this when-you-sleep-you-die-and-are-reborn business fit in? and was this bizarre story the best way to address that theme? and why should it be a mid day siesta? In other words, the method behind the madness needs to be decoded to appreciate/evaluate the film better..even if sub-textual reading is needed it still needs to be a coherent one..
LikeLike