Spoilers ahead…
Some films take an eternity to find a footing. Burma hits the ground running. From the first frame, we know we are in sure hands. The director, Dharanidharan, is a genuine filmmaker – not just because he has the craft, but because he loves the medium. And this love is evident throughout. Take the early scene where Guna (Sampath Raj) is released from Puzhal prison. It’s easy to imagine how this could have played out. Guna steps out from behind bars. He picks up his belongings. He strolls out. But that’s just the what. It’s the how that sets apart the filmmaker from the hack. The how is in Guna’s swagger. It’s in his printed shirt, which looks like the morning sickness after a Persian carpet made love to a greenhouse of orchids. It’s in the music that accompanies him – the twangy guitar, the congas, the castanets.
Burma is about a series of car thefts (the film prefers the term “seizing”), and it’s a heck of a ride. In the driver’s seat is Burma (Michael Thangadurai), who gets into serious trouble when he makes off with a Benz and runs afoul of Bothra Seth (Atul Kulkarni). Thrown into the crazy-noir mix are a mystery man who travels by auto and takes pictures, a violin-playing female gangster, two low-level goons called Bruce Lee and Jet Li (who argue about the name of the heroine of the semi-porn film Khajuraho Ilavarasi), and a beautician who’s really a thief and who’s hawking something that looks like a Fabergé Easter egg. Then there are Boomer (the excellent Karthik Sabesh, as Burma’s pal and accomplice), and Kalpana (Reshmi Menon), Burma’s happily amoral girlfriend who also becomes his partner in crime. The slice of pizza in her hand, after a getaway, is just one of the many glorious incidental details the film keeps throwing at us.
Burma is put together exquisitely. In a montage set to music (by Sudharshan M Kumar, completely in sync with the overall vision), we keep hopping between cross-hatched events. In another scene involving a couple of phone calls, we keep panning between split screens. In the midst of a heist being planned, we cut away to the gang leader’s drug use – this has got to be the most economical bit of character delineation I’ve seen this year. And – apart from that Fabergé – Easter eggs abound. If this film finds half the audience that the similarly fashioned Jigarthanda did – here too, we have ample rug pulling, the reveling in pop culture, plus vivid nods to Western filmmaking – then we’re going to be discussing why Burma’s ring tone is set to a Kamal Haasan line from Kurudhipunal, why so many of the songs heard in the background seem to be from films about crime (Shree 420, Arangetra Velai, Don), and why a key scene is cut in tandem with a key scene from Pudhiya Paravai.
There’s so much attitude, atmosphere, flavor and wry comedy in Burma that I readily forgave the minor sins (the film is a tad too art-directed; Burma’s terrace quarters is done up in the kind of shabby-chic that finds space for lanterns) as well as the major one – after a while, the story takes a detour into a race-against-time thriller, and there isn’t really all that much tension. But Dharanidharan doesn’t try to pump in life artificially – everything is beautifully organic, one of a piece. This is the kind of film that isolates a character by shooting him in lurid neon lights, and, elsewhere, intercuts between a liplock and a bottle of cola being slurped down. The writing is wonderful. I loved how we learn Burma’s given name, during the course of a romantic moment. I loved how Bothra Seth is introduced – his violence makes the water in a glass ripple, as in the scene with the T-rex in Jurassic Park. I loved the little echoes, how Guna completes Burma’s line about dogs and planes in the sky. I loved the joyous sting at the check point – it made me chortle. And I loved, most of all, the last scene – a superb twist, the kind we never get because of our insistence on happily-ever-after. Burma made me so high on how crime can entertain that I almost forgot it doesn’t pay.
KEY:
* Persian = see here
* Jet Li = see here
* Fabergé egg = see here
* Kamal Haasan line from Kurudhipunal = see here
* Pudhiya Paravai = see here
* liplock = see here
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2014 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
venkatesh
September 13, 2014
I haven’t seen the film but loved the trailer and it reminded me of “Gone In 60 Seconds”.
LikeLike
Anand
September 13, 2014
It is not just what is in the review…it is how the review is written:
“morning sickness after a Persian carpet made love to a greenhouse of orchids”
– Lovely!!
LikeLike
vijay
September 14, 2014
Looks like Tamil cinema has been doing really fine of late, quite an upswing
LikeLike
Rohan Nair
September 15, 2014
Yet more Tamil gangster films that all seem to borrow their (admittedly well-oiled) chops from each other. Where is the originality in story telling saar? That is what makes a good film.
LikeLike
Anand
September 15, 2014
Rohan Nair – This is not a gangster film.
LikeLike
Sriram
September 15, 2014
1.) BR, what is Ajith’s favourite car? 🙂
2.) The whole theatre clapped during the checkpoint sting.
LikeLike
Afridi
September 16, 2014
I was rather underwhelmed with the interluding scene of the gang leader shooting heroin during her introduction. Do you think the director thought her drug use would somehow add to her evilness, or was it just plain unnecessary as there was zero relevance in the rest of the film?
LikeLike
brangan
September 17, 2014
Afridi: Why not? Just a bit of character detail, and she does look crazy and out-of-sorts, so a bit of drug use is par for the course, no?
LikeLike
Afridi
September 17, 2014
BR: Well, drug use is rarely portrayed in Tamil films so I guess I thought: hey this could be interesting, but it turns out that it was just to show the most murderous character in the film as someone who also shoots heroin. It took me back to ‘Naan Mahaan Alla’ where the four villains get high on weed before each time they get the urge to rape/murder (something that weed almost never makes you do). I can appreciate that our understanding of drug users is restricted in our conservative society, but in the case of ‘Burma’, I guess I also thought it was rather sexist for the female baddie to be portrayed as a drug user, much like the evil woman who is also a smoker in many films. I’d really like to see a romantic heroine also light one up during a casual conversation so that smoking/drinking/drugs isn’t stereotyped to certain kinds of people/women on film.
Also, what is it with actresses who play a villainess or seductress being dubbed with low-pitched voices?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Srinivas R
September 24, 2014
Afridi , happened to read an interview of the director , where he sorta admitted that its a lazy stereotype to identify the evil gangster with drug use. I was surprised by that candidness. This interview was in the Sunday edition of The Hindu , Cinema Plus.
LikeLike
Pady Srini
November 5, 2014
Fantastic movie. And I happened to watch Madras next day. Madras is a piece of crap. I cant believe the audience didnt take to Burma as well. Maybe they wanted to see some “amma senti”.
LikeLike
brangan
February 17, 2016
Got this really nice note via email. Sharing with permission.
Hello Sir,
My name is Sudharshan Vembutty and I am the one that produced the movie Burma and now ‘Navarasa Thilagam’ which is slated to release this Friday. I have been meaning to email you for a long time and finally got around to doing it. As you know, my first movie Burma was pretty much a wash-out in terms of commercial success. I did lose a lot of money on that project but the only thing that motivated me to go ahead and produce another one was your review of Burma. At a time when I was second guessing myself since my whole family was against the idea of producing movies, your review gave me the confidence that despite not seeing monetary success, I did not fail as a producer. I did bring a good product to light and several technicians that worked in the movie and have been able to move on to other opportunities.
I did have to sell out a bit for the next production because the statement that I kept getting when we were trying to release Burma was ‘There is nothing commercial in this movie’. From satellite rights to distributors, they were all focused only on that one aspect. So I had no choice but to lean towards a run of the mill plot with a comedy background for the next venture. After all, I can’t continue to do this if I keep losing money on every project. Even if it is not the kind of movie that is going to get raved critically, it is a clean entertainer that should appeal to a broad section of the audience.
Anyway, I just wanted to send a long overdue note of thanks for a hint of positivity from the last time around which kept me going. Now, whether that was the right decision or not, we will find out this weekend, I guess! Thanks again.
LikeLiked by 8 people
Ram Murali
February 17, 2016
I found this to be extremely touching. Thanks for sharing…
Hope Mr. Vembutty gets some happiness from a commercial perspective as well in his future ventures. Burma was a kickass movie! Feel bad that it didn’t do well commercially…
LikeLike
newbie
February 17, 2016
Wow! Such nice words from the producer. Makes me think of ‘Navarasa Thilagam’ in a different light. Anyone know a nice website where ‘Burma’ is available to watch?
LikeLike
newbie
February 17, 2016
You know, reading the producer’s note reminded me of this – particularly what Scorsese said of the great Roger Ebert 🙂
http://www.berkeleybeacon.com/arts/2015/3/26/the-importance-of-film-criticism
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rahul
February 17, 2016
Wow, Brangan, this letter made my day!
LikeLike
MANK
February 17, 2016
Brangan, that was a touching letter and what a compliment for a movie critic. thanks for sharing. it sort of exposes the predicament of the current day producer doesnt it? Trying to make a meaningful film in the commerce driven market. i hope his new film is a success, so that it will give him the impetus and finances to make more meaningful films.
newbie, i am a great Roger Ebert fan.his death was a great loss to film criticism. i just love rereading his reviews, especially his great movies section, oh and the bad ebert section too. his reviews of bad films are too damn entertaining.the review of North is a classic. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ram Murali
February 17, 2016
newbie/MANK – I’ve said this before. But I think there are very few reviewers like Roger Ebert who have that sheer love for the movies and complete respect for filmmakers that are dedicated to their craft.
Have a look if time permits. t’s my tribute to him following his passing away in ’13.
http://thinkinggotloud.blogspot.com/2013/05/inspirations-10-of-25-film-critic-roger.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
February 18, 2016
Ram Murali, loved your piece on Ebert. I agree with what you said. he had class and he was a movie lover first and foremost. there was a an affection for movies that was evident in his reviews. Most importantly, he reviewed each film for what they are, very much like our Brangan sir. 🙂
LikeLiked by 5 people
Ram Murali
February 18, 2016
MANK – thank you for reading the article and for your kind words.
LikeLike
brangan
February 19, 2016
Wrote about Ebert a while ago:
LikeLike
MANK
February 19, 2016
Ram Murali, any time man, its great to bond with a fellow movie lover 🙂
Brangan, it is interesting that everybody calls Ebert, the man who loved movies. i agree with you that he was the most accessible of all the main critics – giving the mainstream blockbusters their due. i loved the fact that he put Lethal Weapon, raiders of the lost Ark , Minority report etc… in his top 10 for the year lists .
LikeLike
Ram Murali
February 19, 2016
MANK: Here are two of my favorite Ebert quotes, one for how funny it was and one for how nuanced it was. Actually, I’d highly recommend his “Road to Perdition” review if you haven’t read it. Beautifully balanced, highlighting its strengths such as the acting while mentioning why something else – unpredictability & tension – was missing.
“Choice, a luxury of the Corleones, is denied to the Sullivans and Rooneys, and choice or its absence is the difference between Sophocles and Shakespeare. I prefer Shakespeare.” (Road to perdition)
“This movie doesn’t scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn’t the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn’t below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn’t deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.” (Freddy got fingered)
LikeLiked by 1 person
newbie
February 21, 2016
MANK – I love re-reading Roger Ebert’s reviews too! You know, he was one those few lucky people who I think had absolutely found their life’s calling. I don’t know what else he would have been if he hadn’t been a movie critic. I particularly admire his dry wit and engaging style, not to mention his viewpoint that there are no good or bad movies but only interesting or boring ones.
Ram Murali – Liked your post on Ebert very much! I ended up reading some of your other posts too, like that delightful one about Srividhya.
BR – That was an excellent analysis of Ebert’s work – spot-on about his brilliant way of ‘introducing’ movies to new audiences. Like Lagaan for example – http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/lagaan-once-upon-a-time-in-india-2002 . His unbridled affection for movies was (is) so infectious.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yossarian
February 21, 2016
@Newbie – you can watch Burma at http://www.herotalkies.com
@BR – , thanks for sharing the heartwarming note.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MANK
February 21, 2016
found a rather interesting take on the relationship between movie artists and reviewers
http://www.dailyo.in/arts/film-review-film-critic-kajarya-scarlett-ohara-rhett-butler-william-dalrymple-joe-wright/story/1/9023.html
Ram Murali,newbie, yeah i read the piece on Srividya too, nice one that 🙂
What a beautiful women – never seen more beautiful eyes- and what an exquisitely (natural) brilliant actress. i never caught her acting in any of her films
But her best work was in malayalam films. try to watch idavazhiyile poocha mindapoocha, Irakal, adaminte variyellu etc by master directors like Hariharan and K.G. George. she had a terrific rapport with K.G. George, they were like willaim wyler & Bette Davis. the ease with which she knocked of such complex roles in his films is astonishing to say the least. And to see her at her hilarious best, watch K.G.George’s panchavatippalam, its one of my all time favorite films as well
check this song out from Bharathan’s Kattathe Kilikkoodu. it is one of the most beautiful songs picturised on her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ram Murali
February 21, 2016
newbie – thanks a lot for reading my write-ups. I absolutely adored Srividya and admired many of her performances.
You’ll find this amusing – in one of my early conversations about my wife-to-be, I had asked her, “Who are your favorite character actors?” and I proceeded to add that my favorites were Raghuvaran and Srividya. She was quite bemused! Even though she happens to be Crazy Mohan’s niece, she’s not really a film buff. Much later after we got married, she told me that that question was what made her realize that I was quite an incurable movie buff!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Vidhya
February 22, 2016
This movie released when I had taken a break from watching movies, after having my second child.
Otherwise, with such a glowing tribute from a critic whose views I respect and concur – could and would have promoted it in my circle of friends and colleagues.
As they say, siru thurumbum pal kuththa uthavum – plus with the increasing power of word-of-mouth for smaller movies – who knows, the movie maker could have been richer (or less poor!) by a grand or two.
(Am still on that break & your reviews give me the vicarious pleasure of savouring those missed movies)
LikeLike