Spoilers ahead…
I suppose we should begin with this question: How is the animation, performance-capture and otherwise? Imagine that we had the kind of merchandising culture that Hollywood has perfected, wherein the release of a Star Wars movie would mean that the stores near you would carry figurines of Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader. You’d buy these for your kids, and they’d enter a fantasy world, reenacting scenes from the film (or of their own making) by moving the arms and legs and heads of the toys. The movements would be stiff, disjointed, and the faces would remain expressionless, but the child’s imagination would take care of the rest. Watching Kochadaiiyaan, directed by Soundarya Rajinikanth Ashwin, is a little like that. The actors look stiff, disjointed – especially while executing choreography for the (way too many) songs – and they display no discernable emotion, but after about ten minutes, it didn’t bother me all that much. The trick, I suppose, is not to make comparisons with Hollywood’s animated features but think of the film as something made for Indian television, but blown up for the big screen.
The bigger question is whether Kochadaiiyaan, which heralds Rajinikanth’s return to the cinemas after more than three years, needed to be an animated feature. There are some advantages in opting for animation over live action. Some of the action scenes have the kind of sweep that is impossible to replicate with live actors – or live creatures, for that matter, in the instance of the dolphin that surfaces with the hero balanced on its snout. Then, there’s the dancing, which was never Rajinikanth’s strength – but here, he performs a thandavam and, later, matches steps with the classically trained Shobana. And in his introduction shot, which is possibly the most important part of any film he’s in, he spurs his horse to leap over a chasm, pausing midway to be silhouetted by the sun. Try doing that with a real actor on a real horse.
But when he laughs that laugh, when he delivers those punch lines, when his hand scythes through the air tracing out that half-eight, we don’t feel it’s him. Kochadaiiyaan keeps reminding us that this is him – the charismatic star who gave us Mannan and Thalapathy and Ejamaan (all these titles are folded into dialogues) – and his character does do the things we expect of him, like liberating slaves and dispensing gnomic utterances, but this never feels like “a Rajini movie.”
Part of the problem is surely the generic revenge-oriented plot, which plays out between two warring kingdoms. This may still have worked in live action, but in this animated form (and with hardly any expressions on the characters’ faces), the excitement is muted. Scenes that should have been shaped with the peaks and valleys of high drama end up flat as a plain. And there’s nothing else. There’s no comedy – unless you count the needless resuscitation of Nagesh, in a blink-and-miss part. There’s no romance either. Deepika Padukone plays the princess of the realm (she’s the villain’s daughter, naturally), and she falls for Rajinikanth’s Rana, but there’s not one memorable scene between them. (The film’s idea of detailing a relationship between two characters is to have them burst into song.) Instead, precious screen time is devoted to a baffling subplot involving the romance between Rana’s sister and a prince – after they get married, they’re never seen again.
For a brief while, in a flashback that features Rajinikanth in a second role, Kochadaiiyaan finally becomes “a Rajini movie.” As is typical in masala-movie storytelling, this is where we learn who Kochadaiiyaan is and how Rana fits into the picture, and even though the narrative – here, as elsewhere – is thoroughly generic, there’s at least a bit of energy in these scenes. This is where we catch a glimpse of Rajinikanth’s peerless ability to infuse electric style into his screen presence, tightrope-walking between performance and parody. Otherwise, we’re left with a missed opportunity of historic proportions. Kochadaiiyaan is truly history-making in a sense, because this is the first time that a huge star has allowed himself to be the hero in a full-length animated feature. Walking out, you may find yourself wondering: Did it have to be Rajinikanth?
KEY:
* Kochadaiiyaan = As Wiki puts it, “the king with a long, curly mane”
* thandavam = the dance of Siva… and Sivaji (see here)
* laughs that laugh = see here
* Mannan = see here
* Thalapathy = see here
* Ejamaan = see here
* gnomic utterances = see here
* Nagesh = see here
* tightrope-walking between performance and parody = see here
An edited version of this piece can be found here. Copyright ©2014 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Rajesh
May 24, 2014
Enakkku oru unmai therinjaanum ? Why Deepika Padukone dwarfed so so much ? Did Soundarya Rajinikanth, K.S.Ravikumar and Rajinikanth presumed that all are male chauvinist ? In reality Deepika is 174cm and Rajini is 175cm. Only 1cm difference. But in film it is increased of historic proportions.
Neenga adutha vaatti soundarya rajinikantha’ paatha indha kelviya kelunga… neengalumaa ?
LikeLike
Rajesh
May 24, 2014
When Deepika Padukone got her cheque agreed to be dwarf than she is, this what she would have said in mind “enna porutha varaikkum sappaiyum aambala thaan, ellaa amabaliyum sappai thaan…The best thing being women is its men’s world” (Aarnya Kaadam). ”
http://splicd.com/d2KdB9sqhLk/6763/6785
and Anjali would say this ‘ theriyum da.. ella ambalaikkum ponnunga eppaiyum keezhaiye irukkanum’nu thaana’
http://splicd.com/afhhroFloi8/88/110
LikeLike
Sutheesh Kumar
May 24, 2014
Your review of Kochadaiiyaan is underwhelming, a reflection of what you felt about the movie?
LikeLike
MN MURTHY
May 24, 2014
Dearest BR-sir,
Your review is quite riveting on the right dots.
Being an one helluva ரஜினி-ரசிகன் myself. I really detest this a-la-caricaturing-characterization of the தலைவா! With the director crooning the ♪Motion-Capture ♫ jargon in every interview of her’s – this is quite a giant disappointment.
I would like to leave few notes for your purview and reflect on that:
• Sinbad: Beyond the Veil of Mists (2000) and Final Fantasy:The Spirits Within (2001) are way better than Kochadaiiyaan (2014) given that they were made using primitive technology compared to today.
• Avatar had a budget of 3000 Crore against Kochadaiiyaan’s 125 Crore. Wow, that’s a monstrous budget! Wait a minute, did not they make a ‘Magadheera’ (2009) with a meagre 42 Crore? Well, even a ‘Naan Ee’ was made with 26 Crore, right ?
• When every Khan is out-selling his own image with every superfluous product than other, Rajinikanth was such a relief. Ah! now he too is needed to Flipkart his film with merchandises as a collateral ?!? (http://goo.gl/RhKsx9)
• I understand we fans have gold in our heart, lead in our ears and helium in our lungs,
but which ones of you upped Kochadaiiyaan to 8.7 on IMDB (http://goo.gl/fSsiDn)
Dear Idiotic fans have you people seen: The Silence of the Lambs / It’s a Wonderful Life / Casablanca / Life Is Beautiful / Raiders of the Lost Ark / Rear Window / Psycho / Sunset Blvd / Apocalypse Now / Gladiator / Back to the Future / Alien / Cinema Paradiso / Amélie / Citizen Kane / Aliens / Toy Story / Vertigo / A Clockwork Orange / Singing in the Rain / Bicycle Thieves – Just naming a few, which all are below 8.7 😦
• Dear director-dud, Just because you are a star-kid, does that entitle you to kid-size my star ?
Cheers,
ரஜினி-ரசிகன்-minus-கோச்சடையான்
MN Murthy
LikeLike
ramitbajaj01
May 24, 2014
Mr murthy, imdb ratings change drastically within one month of a movie release.
LikeLike
Kumar
May 24, 2014
Movie is good to watch. please don’t spoil with bad reviews haters if you don’t like leave , rajini movie don’t need reviews. some peoples always criticise each and every movies of rajini. but,he always won.
LikeLike
Arjun
May 24, 2014
No matter how bad the movie sucks, the half-wits and cretins who constitute Rajni’s mass fan base will ensure the movie at least breaks even, if not become a superhit. Even if it flops and Rajni and Soundarya lose money, the fans will offer to reimburse the loss by donating from their own pockets.
LikeLike
oneWithTheH
May 25, 2014
I was hooked from start to finish, honestly because of the twists. Didn’t see them coming, at least till the interval. I didn’t care for the animated-choreo-songs. The choreo made me chuckle. After I came home, I thought this was KSR’s ‘Muthu’ rehash with the setting being periodic this time.
Of course, prior to watching, I had really really REALLY low expectations after seeing the trailer. I guess as you said after the first 10-15 mins, the crude animation didn’t really bother me either.
Was it just me or was the animation on the ‘Rana’ character the most inadequate of all – the puffy cheeks, awkward gait – didn’t work for me at all. It was compensated to a good extent by the ‘Kochadaiiyaan’ character – the intensity in his eyes was well brought out. Everybody else(Shobana, Nasser, esp. were done well) was quite adequate. Deepika-Rajni romance was weighed down heavily by the inexpressive eyes in the close-up shots. It was downright funny.
Did it have to be Rajni?
Yes, I think so.
Did we/he deserve better?
Absolutely.
I think this sort of experiment requires a star vehicle to reach out to people, Shankar’s Endhiran is sort of a parallel here. Even so, Rajni still had to make a twitter debut for the promotions 🙂 With just Soundarya/KSR and an ordinary hero, the movie could have been a non-starter.
LikeLike
abvblogger
May 25, 2014
The energy of the second half is incomparably better. I wonder why Rajini agrees to do scripts that spend the first half not being a Rajini movie. A disturbing trend that started with Shivaji.
I feel heartless when I criticize the animation, but it’s true. Both expression & motion were weird and stilted, particularly in the first half.
Also, it’s futile trying to do a complete transition from the usual movie to animation. The song & dance sequences were really weird, except perhaps the Shivratri dance.
The person next to me was incredulous after the first 10 minutes. ‘Bomma movie aa?’ he asked me. Yes. ‘Full aa?’ I replied in the affirmative. He snorted ‘Dhandam!’ and glared at his wife. He did not tire of repeating Dhandam throughout, pausing only to ask me if I thought they might bring on the real thing midway.
LikeLike
Karthik
May 25, 2014
A missed opportunity indeed– with an intricate plot, characters etched deeper, fewer or shorter songs, and animation that captured facial expressions or, at the very least, the direction of the eyes, what this could’ve been!
But one thing I didn’t come out wondering was did it have to be Rajinikanth. In fact, I was thankful this was a Rajnikanth movie. Hollywood has had no problem making the $200 million economics of animated or mythological movies work. But in a region where big producers will only invest if Santhanam or TASMAC make appearances, we badly, badly, need something like this to work. With technology where it is today, and a history as rich as any, where are our period films? Where are the animated features that dare our kids to imagine, to dream? How long do we wait till technology cheapens so much that our “Waterworld”s can fail without killing ideas?
If Kochadaiyaan succeeds, and I do hope it does, it will be because of Rajinikanth. The movie did have grandeur and action unseen in our movies before, but not even close to being enough for box office success. The only highs in the movie came when Rajini was being Rajini — the commanding presence, the senthamizh punch dialogues.
Martin Sheen and Michael Douglas had the gravitas and talent to sell their roles as the American President. I don’t think Tamil cinema has another persona today who will be accepted as a leader of this stature and that too in this strange medium.
Early box office reports do say that only the Tamil version is seeing success and I’d wager Rajini’s the reason.
LikeLike
Tejas
May 25, 2014
@BR why the review in Hindu edited in such a hapazard manner..lines have been cut in between without making much sense..is it just a mistake or intentional editing?
LikeLike
brangan
May 25, 2014
MN MURTHY: At the end, semma punch line saar 🙂
oneWithTheH: Twist-aa? I must say I didn’t find anything that surprising or worthy enough to be called a ‘twist.’ It was all so generic.
abvblogger: I know. Everyone here seems to be calling this a “bommai padam” 🙂
Tejas: As a writer, you learn very soon not to agonise over how subs treat your copy. Sometimes they do good work, catching errors you didn’t know you made — as these pieces are all written in a hurry. And sometimes, they chop lines, break paras weirdly… That’s why I keep the blog. This is the way I meant it to be read.
LikeLike
KayKay
May 25, 2014
Just caught this. All my predictions came true. What would have been a passable historical actioner if shot live is reduced to a C Grade Puppet Show with D Grade CGI whose sole achievement of note is increasing Deepika’s cup size and Mo-Cap replete with all the flaws inherent in the medium during it’s earliest days; Waxy complexions, dead eyes and movements so stiff it’s barely a step up from Stop Motion.
Soundarya used her father’s name to offload a sub-standard product that provides further proof why some animals eat their young.
Only one walking away this Student Film not smelling of something awful is Rahman for his divine soundtrack.
LikeLike
KayKay
May 25, 2014
And the last Rajini movie that had the temerity to end with this spine-chilling word:
THODARUM
was Baba
‘Nuff said!
LikeLike
Anuja
May 25, 2014
Well put Kaykay! Rofl! I was hoping Soundarya had learnt her lesson from the (mercifully) ill – fated Sultan. But no… We had to have this crappy excuse for a film foisted on us. The worst part was NDTV saw fit to give her an award (presented by Ranbir Kapoor) for innovation in technology or some such thing. Now we’ll probably be subjected to umpteen sequels with Soundarya ostensibly at the helm while some poor schmuck of a director will be sweet talked by her father into holding his Princess’s hand. Heaven help us all!
LikeLike
Ravi K
May 26, 2014
I haven’t seen this yet, but judging from the trailers, the animation is not even up to the standard of the 13-year-old “Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.” I turned that movie off about 20 minutes into it because I couldn’t connect to the dead-eyed CG people and because I was unengaged with the story and characters.
Motion capture can work well when applied to non-photorealistic CGI creatures, like Gollum from LOTR, or the characters in Monster House. Attempting photorealistic CGI humans is an uphill battle, even for Hollywood studios, because of the “uncanny valley” effect, which makes it easier to believe The Simpsons are more real than the characters in The Polar Express.
LikeLike
sanjay2706
May 26, 2014
Some people on the social media hailed this as a small step for the Indian Animation industry. I disagree with it and my comment will focus on this claim.I wouldn’t speak of the plot and storyline as it’s always a subjective area. Besides, I am a firm believer in form over content.
The movie would be successful , but not for the technology but for Rajini’s brand. That in itself is a body blow to the so called animation industry of India.
The movie was a stepping stone, and hence the focus should have been on getting the small things right. However, the technology has been used as a mere star vehicle. I feel that they went for the Mo-Cap as Rajni was getting old and he couldn’t spend more time on the sets.
Remember Luxo Jr by John Lasseter! That was the humble beginning of Pixar.
Remember Hayao Miyazaki , who still hand draws his movies!
Remember “Mary and Max”, which definitely was low budget and yet so artistic.
These are some examples of highly talented people beginning in a small way, and achieving greater things as they mastered the technology.
Merchandising is a great way for the producers to earn profits, but for that great characters need to be created. Jurassic Park mugs and mickey mouse tees sell to this day, can Kochadayaan sell outside TN? I guess not.
The other characters were totally neglected, a legend like Nagesh ridiculed, and women characters reduced to mere eye candy(although u can’t really salivate at a caricature of Deepika). Overall, it seems like a typical Rajini movie, and there isn’t any progress on the technology side.
The key to build a solid industry is to hire better writers, creative people with vision. Make a few short films which are solid in technology and in storytelling. That would maybe attract a businessman with vision (like steve jobs in pixar) and the money would come. The budgets would increase and the product would be enhanced.
They have been saying that budget is the reason for substandard content. I say Improve the content and start small, the budgets would come.
LikeLike
abvblogger
May 26, 2014
@sanjay2706 I really enjoyed your analysis. I hope your vision comes true 🙂
LikeLike
Srini
May 26, 2014
@sanjay2706: ” I say Improve the content and start small, the budgets would come”
– Completely agree. Naan E is a good example of that. It wasn’t a great movie or great technology , but it made me invest in that housefly and I was rooting for that “E” to defeat the villian in the climax. That’s the least a movie should achieve.
LikeLike
MANK
May 26, 2014
Soundarya used her father’s name to offload a sub-standard product that provides further proof why some animals eat their young
KayKay,Anuja
I think you people are being too harsh on Soundarya. I think its really the other way around. Rajni using his daughter and the so called new technology to further his own career, This was a genuine attempt from her to resurrect Rajni after he has become too ill to do movies anymore. But the Rajni brand is still gold and this was one way of capitalizing on it as it seems that the great superstar now seems physically inept at doing the things on screen that he is most famous for.The fact that she lacks the skills for it is another matter.So blaming her for foisting this on Rajni seems rather far fetched.About all other things, the film , the writing,the use of technology, etc etc…. i agree with everybody here wholeheartedly.
Sanjay:The movie would be successful , but not for the technology but for Rajini’s brand.
Sanjay, well that’s the point. I firmly believe that this was never about the technology . but about Rajni.Rajni & family just hit upon this idea to keep the Rajni brand flying high and continue to mint crores from it.This was really testing the waters , so to say to see how far one can push the Rajni brand. well if this succeeds commercially, then just think of the possibilities for Rajni.He can pretty much make films sitting on his rocking chair well into eternity. 🙂
LikeLike
Karthik
May 26, 2014
@BR. Carry a lot of respect for your reviews & have read your books too. Couple of things which I think you should look to provide in your review is:
1. Comparison to movies in Hollywood where in living actors whose expressions are well know through their movies and daily public life have been attempted to be either motion captured or animated. Do kindly add in if those movies bring out the characteristic features and mannerisms of those actors
2. List of movies in Indian cinema which has explored new technology in film making and adapted it to satiate the appetite of the massive diverse film buffs, fans and critics and hence become blockbuster hits.
All I seek is a balanced review from a person of your stature as many would be influenced by what you write.
LikeLike
Ravi K
May 26, 2014
Karthik, there’s no such thing as a “balanced” or “objective” review. A reviewer can only write his opinion of the film. All this excuse-making and backlash against criticism is from people who can’t take the idea that perhaps this film isn’t very good.
Eega/Naan Ee made you root for the fly in an utterly ridiculous story. The visuals themselves were inventive too. Enthiran also used CGI well. Whatever issues the CGI may have had were more than made up for by the go-for-broke insanity.
Sanjay2706, I’m glad you brought up Pixar and Miyazaki. As great as their animation is, their storytelling abilities are equally as great. They know how to tell engaging and moving stories with memorable characters. Until Indian filmmakers understand how to tell great stories, all this obsession with motion-capture, CGI, and digital cameras is just useless technology fetishizing.
LikeLike
Arun
May 27, 2014
Hi, No review of Santhanam’s VPA(Vallavanukum Pullum Aayudham).A comedy treat I must say.
LikeLike
KayKay
May 27, 2014
“Attempting photorealistic CGI humans is an uphill battle, even for Hollywood studios”
Ravi K, absolutely agree as this clip from Zemeckis’ Beowulf proves:
Now, remove the fluidity of motion and the perfect lip-synchs from the above and you get an idea what an eyesore Kochadaiyaan was.
Sanjay2706, well articulated my friend! Couldn’t agree more
Anuja, what I find a little baffling is this “A for Effort” mentality when it comes to giving a pass to mediocre and sub-par offerings from Indian movies. I mean, we’re happy to slam Hollywood movies when the storylines and characters are shallow IN SPITE of featuring dazzling effects, but conversely,expect amateurish graphics in our movies to be glossed over because it supposedly contains solid content (which Kochadaiyaan doesn’t have, by the way. The script is merely adequate)? The brilliant evocation of Middle -Earth and the Dragon Smaug doesn’t excuse Peter Jackson for padding a small book out into 9 hours of film, but glass-eyed marionettes in Kochadaiyaan should be accepted because of a (sic) good script and a first for Indian films?
“I firmly believe that this was never about the technology . but about Rajni”
MANK, if this is the case, then it’s all the more unfortunate given that virtually all the hype leading up to this movie was about trumpeting it as India’s first Performance Capture film. It sets up expectations it could hardly satisfy. At worst, it’s dishonest to Rajini fans. Stunt doubles are an effective and far cheaper not to mention more photorealistic solution to combat an aging superstar’s diminishing agility, as Endhiran proved.
LikeLike
brangan
May 27, 2014
Srini: It wasn’t a great movie or great technology
Actually, I thought “Naan Ee” was a great movie. The somewhat below-par effects apart, it was a damn good example of storytelling.
MANK: This was a genuine attempt from her to resurrect Rajni after he has become too ill to do movies anymore.
I think that’s how this project began. Rajini fell ill and went for treatment (Singapore, I think) and stuff, and they felt he was in no shape to do live-action and hence this idea took root.
KayKay: But that “A for Effort” mentality is there all around. If you bash “Irandaam Ulagam,” someone will say “at least recognise the fact that someone tried to do something different instead of criticising it.”
LikeLike
MN MURTHY
May 27, 2014
Off course, nobody is gonna walk up to the bank laughing by wood-pecking on the director.
What SRA had to her advantage is 100% all-time-all-access to Rajinikanth. With due respect to KB-sir and Mahendran-sir, none other can imagine this awesome gift. Yet she faltered with the opportunity is the available truth.
Universally, you EARN the right to the stars.
Here, it looks like you just INHERITED it awfully.
Having said that, the blame should equally rest on the superstar too for entrusting a new-comer, who has no proven experience in short-films or other formats! Many of the Naalaya Iyakunars would have come with believable stories and presentation!
About the technical jazz!
We Indians WERE very good at sensibilities. Even European cinema aficionados used to adore our films. But we seem to have lost it all – in the mad rush to make films – that has a ‘Made Like Hollywood’ stamp on it.
With no offense intending, even director Shankar’s magnum opus VFX wizardry in Endhiran can NEVER live up to the yesteryear blockbusters like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) or Hero (2002) or a Kung Fu Hustle (2004)
Film-making is not about story-telling anymore. It’s about enlivening experiences!
About Budgets!
Money has NOT been the issue here, it is the VISION that we are handicapped with. If it was only the money, we would not have made the Mughal-e-Azam, way back in 1960.
Finally, after any good cinema, it is not the technology that we take home, but the dried tears in our eyes, smiles glowing on our faces, lumps in our throats or perhaps sunshine in our hearts. Ironically. these days, we are doing just the opposite: talking of the silicon and discounting the emotion, film-by-film.
LikeLike
Rama
May 27, 2014
Guess she answers it all here. Please watch from 4.20 – 7.00 !!
LikeLike
Anurag
May 27, 2014
@ MN MURTHY, very well summed up. I second every word of your last paragraph. The hold on story telling is the root of evry film and is sorely missing in all today.
LikeLike
Anuja
May 27, 2014
@MANK If Rajini no longer has what it takes to do live action films, perhaps he should retire gracefully instead of ruining his legacy for fans like me. And its not like he needs the money, so why be greedy?
Shivaji and Endhiran made Chandramukhi seem like a classic which itself was hardly a patch on Baasha or Padaiyyappa (the best from the post Annamalai oeuvre as BR noted) Now we have Linga in the making and I am filled with dread at the prospect of seeing the guy I once revered reduced to a buffoonish caricature of his once glorious self.
Note to self: Thou shalt content thouself by watching old Rajini films and not punish thyself by heading to the theatre for putrid fare concocted by his offspring or the likes of Shankar, even if thou hopest for another Padaiyappa from KSR.
LikeLike
MANK
May 28, 2014
KayKay,Anuja
Agree with you, its a real pity.I too feel terribly disappointed to see him reduced to this. But i think there is an entire network of charities and foundations that Rajni is associated with that requires continuous cash flow. The film distribution and exhibition itself may be dependent on that one Rajni film that comes every 3 or 4 years that helps them sustain and cut the losses on others. (not to mention the pressure from his fan clubs)so may be its not easy for him to chuck it up all and retire.Otherwise he may have done that long time ago as he had said something to that effect during the release of Baba, that it would most probably be his last film.Guess Baba flopped and spoiled his plans may be of his political entry as well.So he chose to continue with acting, i guess.
Yeah , its better of watching Baasha, Padayappa or even moondru mugham which is one of favorite rajni performances.
LikeLike
Gradwolf
May 28, 2014
I don’t get the love for Padaiyappa! Such a tedious film to watch. Well, maybe the first time is alright but the way it is revered during reruns on TV. That way, I think the best film that got all of Rajini’s dimensions covered is Endhiran. A lot of things about that film was organic and it was a superstar vehicle and did not boast about it. I’ll take Shankar over KSR every time.
This maybe blasphemy to suggest here but Sivaji’s bhajji scene triumphs the overrated oonjal scene from Padaiyappa. Any day. Ok bye.
LikeLike
hari
May 28, 2014
Super start should start acting his age and make some kick ass movies, instead of romancing Deepika 🙂
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 28, 2014
“If Rajini no longer has what it takes to do live action films, perhaps he should retire gracefully instead of ruining his legacy for fans like me.”
Seema has it that it is a very Indian thing. Do you agree?
http://seemagoswami.blogspot.fr/2013/09/the-show-must-go-on.html
LikeLike
Rahini David
May 29, 2014
I can’t say I completely understand what this motion capture thingie is all about. But if they can resurrect Nagesh for a part and make Rajini dance a better thandavam, does that mean that they can make a Marilyn Monroe item song? Could they have cast MGR instead of Rajini as the lead?
And remember Rule 34. There are no exceptions.
LikeLike
hari
May 30, 2014
Ofcourse they can, have you seen S1m0ne?
LikeLike
Ravi K
May 30, 2014
That’s certainly possible. Fred Astaire can also sell vacuum cleaners.
LikeLike
niranjanmb
June 13, 2014
I saw this video this morning: (It is only about 2:30)
This apparently is close to the best motion capture as of today. I thought it might be a nice juxtaposition into this discussion about motion capture, or rather it’s epic failure in Kochadaiiyaan. Surprisingly, the developers of this motion capture technology, , Snappers Systems, are based out of Cairo, Egypt!
LikeLike