The first Cars movie was one of Pixar’s longest – if not in actual time, then at least in terms of the time that you felt had elapsed between settling into your seat and shuffling out – and part of the problem was that it took an hour to get into its story, strung around a scrappy group of characters in Radiator Springs. (How odd that the early portions, with race cars zipping by in blurs of metallic colour, seemed so sluggish, and the film had to land in a sleepy little nowhere-town to pick up speed.) Cars 2 dispenses with that little issue by stepping on the accelerator right at the beginning, with a stretch of secret-agent intrigue straight out of James Bond. (It’s even scored to pastiche James Bond music, with bass licks and blaring trumpets.) This appears, at first, a remarkable improvement, the equivalent of taking a troublesome car to the mechanic and fixing exactly what needed to be fixed – but soon we find ourselves in a peculiar position, yearning for the relatively simpler (if unremarkable) pleasures of the first film.
How much eye candy can the eye take before sugar shock sets in? Cars 2 could be your personal litmus test, as it packs its frames with the splendours of neon-tinted Japan, coastal Italy and, finally, London. As a testament to the skills and the sweat of a million animators, the film is an unqualified triumph. But unless you’re a millionaire whose hobby is collecting cars, you don’t buy an automobile because of how the eye swoons to its gleaming externals – you buy it because of, among other considerations, the way the upholstery feels against your backside. That practicality of purpose is missing in this flashy and ultimately empty sequel, and an early segment unwittingly lays out what we’ve lost. We’re back, briefly, in Radiator Springs, and we see that Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson, again doing outstanding voice work) is now the winner of four Piston Cups, now renamed for Doc Hudson, the crusty old automobile voiced by the late Paul Newman. It’s a minor meta-moment that coasts on nostalgia for an actor last seen (or heard) in a movie that coasted on nostalgia. The link to the best part of the earlier film – the latter half – is made explicit, and we’re primed for more homespun enchantment with McQueen’s best friend Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) and girlfriend Sally (Bonnie Hunt). After all, that is what sequels do, taking the things we liked and shuffling them around in ways that are fresh yet familiar.
Instead, the director John Lasseter – in a move that is bold, if not quite bright – yanks us from Radiator Springs and its residents and thrusts us into a racing competition that sprawls over exotic worldwide locations. In a move that’s even bolder (and even less bright), Lightning McQueen is reduced to second banana, while Mater – whose corn-pone shtick is mildly tolerable in small doses – begins to occupy centre stage, mistaken for an international spy by Finn McMissile (Michael Caine, pitch perfect in a retro-styled character whose “moustache” suggests he’s part Hercule Poirot, part Zorro) and Holly Shiftwell (Emily Mortimer). And we’re suddenly in an adventure whose hero mistakes green wasabi for pistachio ice cream and screams his roof off. Is this what humour at Pixar has been reduced to? But talk to the kids in the audience and they’ll label you a grouch – after they’ve finished laughing to this, which they’ll claim is the funniest joke in the whole wide world. Cars 2, then, is the rare Pixar film that – despite its winking homages to 007, like that one-liner from a secret agent about being in the import-export business – is aimed squarely at children. For the adults in the audience, it’s déjà vu all over again, a long, long wait till The End.
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2011 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
DJ Pingle
June 25, 2011
Spot on Baddy… just got back from the movie and it was a drag – even on my boys who were enjoying the samosas, chicken nuggets and popcorn more than the movie
LikeLike
Shankar
June 26, 2011
Baddy, I completely agree with your take on the movie. This was a James Bond film under the guise of a Cars film. It was just too high tech, even if it was squarely aimed at kids, for them to appreciate. Maybe older kids might enjoy the film, but the younger ones just can’t get into this film as they could with the original. It’s a strange direction from Pixar since most of the merchandising around the characters is aimed at the younger lot. I took my 4 year old son for his first movie experience in a theater and he wanted to leave after 45 minutes and I had to coax him to stay till the end.
Well, we had one good experience at the show. Midway through the film, the digital projection system conked off (brought back memories of the audi 🙂 ) and we had an interruption for 3-4 minutes while they fixed it. At the end of the show, as we were exiting, the theater handed every person a free ticket for any film to be used in the future. Imagine getting a free pass because they briefly interrupted our viewing experience due to the system breakdown. That was a really good gesture (and if I may add, rarely happens elsewhere).
So I guess I can’t complain…I did get to watch it for free!! 🙂
Pingle, no samosas here…only popcorn & coke!! 🙂
LikeLike
Krishna
June 26, 2011
^^ Shankar, which theatre was this??
😉
LikeLike
bran1gan
June 26, 2011
DJP and Shankar: Nice to have a mini reunion here 🙂
LikeLike
Umesh
June 27, 2011
My kid got hooked onto Cars 1 when the Sheryl Crow number caught his eye on YouTube this January (2011) when he was just 3. That’s when we discovered the movie too and enjoyed it thoroughly.
My kid became such a fanboy that he demanded McQueen/Cars t-shirts, caps, watches, toys….we were looking forward to make Cars 2 his first enjoyable big screen experience….(unfortunately last year we had taken him to Endhiran and he dragged me out the moment he woke up – just before the interval – the theatre background sound levels were atrocious!).
So when we hit the theatres a couple of days back to watch Cars 2….thanks to 3D he somehow managed to sit and watch for almost an hour but the last 30 minutes he wanted out! Somehow managed to keep him occupied and finish the movie.
Wish they had stuck to a simpler plot to engage the true fanboys – the 3 to 5 year olds!
Am a regular reader of your reviews and use it as a benchmark
LikeLike
bran1gan
June 27, 2011
Umesh: I hear you about theatre background sound levels. Sometimes even I feel I need ear plus or cotton or something so that I can lessen the sound. It surely can’t be good for children.
LikeLike
Vasisht Das
June 27, 2011
branigan & umesh : just this –
the atrociously LOUD sound levels at movie theatres is particularly worse in TN and chennai in particular – has been so for decades. (like it or not, the non-tamilians generalize and dismiss this as something that goes with the the aesthetics of majority of tamizh cinema/tv/mass culture ).
this is not such a pervasive problem in bengaluru or mumbai, for instance.
LikeLike
Umesh
June 27, 2011
“aesthetics of majority of tamizh cinema/tv/mass culture”
Got to agree with you….because I remember when watching movies in TN….Chennai / Madurai / Sivakasi…..the theatre wallas used to crank up the sound at dramatic moments – where dialogues had stopped and the background score took over….
Sadly this continues in Dubai….I had tried to watch Endhiran at the Grand Hyatt….my kid was almost 3 then….but I had company…a father had walked out with his two kid daughters and said they couldn’t take the sound / noise levels anymore.
Heard that Resul Pookutty was also upset about this and had filed a RTI? directed at the theatre owners.
LikeLike
Shankar
June 28, 2011
I agree about the sound levels. I remember watching Anniyan in Satyam and my ears felt like getting blasted through, especially during the song sequences. Thankfully, I don’t get subjected to that here.
My son is now hooked onto the Weezer track from Cars 2 and wants us to decorate his room with Cars decals.
LikeLike