Among the low pleasures in life, few can top films about fellow humans beset by bees and killer fish and other generally horrific situations.
The provocatively titled Piranha 3DD is, uh, a bust. It delivers neither on the first half of its title, nor the latter half – unless, of course, our censors had something to do with it. The film can be loosely described as Baywatch-meets-Jaws – lots of people in skimpy swimsuits jogging in the direction of the (3D) camera as nasty fish with pointy teeth target their well-toned flesh. As a big fan of the earlier film (which was simply called Piranha 3D), I was quite disappointed, and to explain why, I must share with you a deep, dark secret. Every film critic has a vice, a fondness for a shockingly disreputable genre. Some like horror films, for instance – that’s the only genre I detest. I see no point in sitting in front of something and closing your eyes because the soundtrack jumps up a few notches. I prefer schlocky films, where hubris-filled men get their comeuppance for playing God, and also the so-called “creature features,” where human beings become prey. Switch off the lights and pass the popcorn.
My favourite man-playing-God films include The Towering Inferno (man tries to play God and build tallest skyscraper; it goes up in flames) and Deep Blue Sea (man tries to play God and cure Alzheimer’s with brain tissue harvested from genetically modified sharks; he’s reduced to fish food) – but not Titanic. For one, the latter is too ambitious a production. It doesn’t exactly qualify as a “guilty pleasure” like The Towering Inferno, which is worth the ticket price (or the rental price) simply to watch megawatt stars like Steve McQueen, Paul Newman and Faye Dunaway pretend, by way of all that acting, that they signed on for reasons other than the fat sums of money they were being paid. It’s always a bonus when big stars are trapped in yawning chasms of land (Charlton Heston and Ava Gardner in Earthquake) or pursued by killer bees (Michael Caine and Katharine Ross in The Swarm).
The Birds may feature a similar plot – people evading avian assassins – but it’s too classy a film to qualify as junk. Its set pieces are thrilling constructions, and besides the real stars aren’t Rod Taylor and Tippi Hedren (who weren’t all that big as stars anyway) but the director Alfred Hitchcock. For the creature feature with smaller stars and guiltier pleasures, we should look towards Alligator, which has the titular creature (a giant, naturally) that’s taken up residence in Chicago’s sewers and is polishing off people, or Anaconda, where Jennifer Lopez, frustratingly, survives being swallowed up by a monster snake. (Rooting for specific people to die is one of the chief pleasures of the creature feature.) The best of this kind of film, in recent times, was Piranha 3D, which opened with a scene that’s a classic of its kind, both a wink to Jaws (Richard Dreyfuss in water) and a parody of it (he’s devoured by a school of piranha, almost as if in retaliation for the shark murder he committed all those decades ago in Steven Spielberg’s blockbuster; revenge, if you remember, is a dish best served cold).
But there’s another kind of people-in-peril movie that I’ve begun to enjoy, and that’s the no-budget feature about being trapped in a specific situation. The best such film I’ve seen is Buried, where Ryan Reynolds wakes up to find himself in a coffin under the sands of Iraq. These films operate on a higher level than the big-stars-screaming-their-way-to-safety genre and the smaller-stars-becoming -animal-food genre. They envelop you in a queasy state of anxiety. Unlike the laughable protagonists of those other films, we are actually invested in the survival of Ryan Reynolds, and while those other films remain distant viewing experiences, Buried makes us wonder what we’d do in this situation. (No one watching Alligator, on the other hand, is going to think, “Let me prepare myself for an eventual attack by a giant reptile lurking beneath my toilet.”) We feel for Reynolds in ways we don’t feel for James Franco in 127 Hours because Franco, in a way, was responsible for his plight – Reynolds wasn’t.
Two other films of this nature that impressed me are Open Water and Frozen – and both play on our fears of what we’d do if stuck in these very plausible situations. In Open Water, a tourist couple is left behind in a shark-infested sea when their boat captain takes a wrong headcount and sails away with the others. And in Frozen, which was one of those serendipitous TV-channel discoveries, three friends are trapped in a ski lift (bad weather from above, circling wolves below) after the resort shuts down for the week. I realise that in writing about Buried and Open Water and Frozen, I have deviated from my original premise of cheesy films about imperiled humans, but all these films are built on our primal fears about being stranded in situations where we are no longer in control, and against enemies (whether creatures or the elements) we have no natural defenses against. It’s just that some of these films make us laugh, while the others make us grateful to return to a warm bed at night.
Lights, Camera, Conversation… is a weekly dose of cud-chewing over what Satyajit Ray called Our Films Their Films. An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2012 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Ramasubramanian Sundararajan
June 22, 2012
Ah, finally someone who loves this genre as much as I do!
My favourite in the category is Dinocroc versus Supergator — by the time you’re done orgasming over the title, the two reptiles have, between them, snacked on half the cast.
It is probably a commentary on how successful this idea is, that some movies come up with really outlandish ways of letting humans screw with Mother Earth/Nature and having the latter strike back. The Core is an entertaining recent example. Volcano is another, where the Anne Heche character says, in response to a volcano erupting in the middle of LA, that ”the city is finally paying for its arrogance.” (And I don’t think she meant it in the Sodom and Gomorrah sense either.)
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 22, 2012
Buried and OpenWater are excellent. In the same vein , i suggest – The Tunnel , horror plus creature feature. Brilliant.
LikeLike
arun1151arzvi
June 22, 2012
As much as I like to say I enjoyed your post, the pic of hot-girl tops it :-p
LikeLike
vijay
June 22, 2012
Looks like my taste for guilty pleasures are more or less on the same line as yours. The “it can happen to you” kind of thriller is a favorite genre even when the film is not executed all that well. The first two-thirds or so of Breakdown(Kurt Russel) was riveting. So was Frantic. And many more.
“and also the so-called “creature features,” where human beings become prey”
a thin line between that and horror flicks.
Especially when the predator happens to be a human as well like in Hostel or Turistas unlike say, an Aliens.
LikeLike
Abhirup.
June 22, 2012
A very good read, as usual. Would like to know what you think of ‘Jaws’. You have mentioned the film every now and then in other reviews, but have never spoken of your opinion of it. Since it’s a personal favourite, I would like to know if you love it as well.
LikeLike
TheKomentor
June 23, 2012
That picture is a good advertisement for why women should remain natural.
LikeLike
brangan
June 23, 2012
Ramasubramanian Sundararajan: I’m not sure about “The Core.” That’s a little too sci-fi to come under guilty pleasure, no? I remember not liking the film very much.
venkatesh: “The Tunnel”? Never heard of this. Thanks.
vijay: From what I’ve heard of Hostel, I’m not sure I’ll enjoy it. Same with the “Saw” series. That kind of gore and stuff I cannot handle.
Abhirup: Oh, “Jaws” is an amazing film, but I wouldn’t club it with other creature features. It has the same premise, yes, but it’s got great characters, and some extremely well-written dialogue. Also, it’s treated un-campily, whereas the whole fun with creature features is the fact that the makers themselves are winking at us in a way.
TheKomentor/arun1151arzvi: I think you guys need to sit down and thrash this one out 🙂
LikeLike
Milind
June 23, 2012
As a film critic, who can be objective about any film, i wonder why you ‘detest’ the horror genre??!! there are some great horror films out there, you know!
LikeLike
venkatesh
June 23, 2012
BR: Saw is not really gore – at least the first one – Saw 1 i.e. The latter versions degenerated the first one is a bona-fide “good” movie.
LikeLike
brangan
June 24, 2012
Milind: I can’t handle those films da. That’s all. It’s like… If I point out the nice things about “Thillana Mohanambal” and ask you to watch it, will you? Nenja thottu sollu :-p
LikeLike
Shankar
June 28, 2012
Baddy, I’m sure recalling Earthquake did bring some humorous memories back!! 🙂
Also, there was this Malayalam movie a few years ago where Jayaram’s child falls down a construction hole and pretty much, the film is about the rescue. I believe this was also remade in Tamil with Prabhu. As you said, I shiver to think what I would do in such a situation…similar to the Buried film.
LikeLike