Spoilers ahead…
Midway through Poojai, I had a frightening thought. The director Hari is… an auteur. I know what you’re thinking, that this is what happens when you watch way too many of these films – but hear me out. If the definition of an auteur is someone whose distinct fingerprints are all over the film, then isn’t Hari one? Let’s examine Poojai. Scenes where the hero’s (Vasu, played by Vishal) voice becomes louder as he recites dialogue, so that he’s practically screaming by the time he gets to the last word? Check. Large families (with well-regarded actors like Sathyaraj and Radhika), and larger melodrama? Check. A background score that takes its cues from a jackhammer tearing up a road? Check. A swooping camera that captures the action from all angles, all directions, leaving you with the feeling of watching the movie from the inside of a washing machine in the spin cycle? Check. And most crucially, that vague feeling of scenes being fast-forwarded – some of it, sometimes all of it, goes by in a blur.
Poojai, thus, is very much “a Hari film,” which means it’s near impossible to write about it in any meaningful way. But a critic has a job to do, things to point out – and in that spirit, it must be said that Vasu, who makes a living as a loan shark, isn’t entirely uninteresting. He smokes and drinks, but he’s not a misogynistic creep. Before speeding away in his car, with sickle-wielding villains breathing down his neck, he turns to his girlfriend Divya (Shruti Haasan, whose beauty inspires the Keatsian nickname… Ooty Urilakizhangu) and snaps on her seatbelt. This, clearly, is a principled man. In a film of this sort, it’s inevitable that bodies will end up hurtling through windshields, but at least hers won’t be one of them. If this isn’t true love, then what is? Also, Vasu isn’t a man of the masses. He’s rich… like really rich. He’s the MD of a large concern in Coimbatore. He speaks Hindi effortlessly. He watches English movies. Someone unfamiliar with the Hari… uh, oeuvre could be forgiven for thinking that there’s an attempt here to accommodate a slightly different kind of “Tamil hero” within the confines of the star-driven masala movie.
But of course that’s never going to happen. Vasu may be A-centre in terms of his background, but where it matters most (and to the relief of the film’s distributors), he’s still B- and C-centre. Hence the bar song and the fight sequences that seem to take place in Krypton, given how miniscule a part gravity plays in the proceedings. Hence the “comedy sequence” where Vasu instructs his buddy (Soori) to bring Divya something cool from the fridge and the latter holds out… a bottle of beer. (Soori and Pandi try routines along the lines of the ones by Goundmani and Senthil, including a nod to the now-legendary vaazhapazham bit.) The story is something about Vasu’s family being threatened by a gang of contract killers, but does anyone really care? Poojai is so depressingly generic that it’s best summed up in the scene where the Pandi character refuses to go to a screening of Gravity because he won’t understand a word. And Vasu says, “Summa vandhu AC-la thoongu.” That’s another characteristic of the Hari movie. The movie itself doesn’t matter.
KEY:
* Poojai = worship
* Ooty Urilakizhangu = a potato from Ooty
* vaazhapazham bit = see here
Copyright ©2014 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
onenishanth
October 23, 2014
Vantaangada namba mass padatha asinga padutharthukku ingleesh kathukkunu. Eyyy, yaar kitta! Mani Ratnam is wonly Hari of class ma. Hari is not Mani of Mass, okva?
LikeLiked by 3 people
kainattu
October 23, 2014
‘Midway through Poojai, I had a frightening thought. The director Hari is… an auteur’
Hahahahaha
LikeLike
Ram Murali
October 23, 2014
The way people roared in the trailer (as in all Hari movies) a more apt title would have been “Poojai-la Karadi!”
LikeLike
venkatesh
October 24, 2014
All hail Hari… just wait til the French “discover” him
LikeLiked by 1 person
bart
October 24, 2014
Gravity illadha padathula Gravity paaka sonnadhayum, Jackhammer adichu kelappura padathula thoonga solradhum pona povudhunu paatha, theriyathanama stamp vachurukkara oruthara auteur nu solradhu, nemmbba over..
But, that one line – “leaving you with the feeling of watching the movie from the inside of a washing machine in the spin cycle”
—> Adhu.. #theri
LikeLike
Rahini David
October 24, 2014
Is director Visu an Auteur? What about Vikraman?
LikeLike
brangan
October 24, 2014
bart / Rahini David: Okay, I was just kidding about that whole auteur thing. There’s more to being an “auteur”, however loosely you define it, than just surface similarities like the one listed in the first para above.
LikeLike
Sutheesh Kumar. P. S.
October 24, 2014
If you are familiar with the Superman mythology those fight sequences wouldn’t work on Krypton. Only a Krytonian on Earth can do that.
LikeLike
Rahini David
October 24, 2014
BR: I know you were kidding. I usually can identify sarcasm with reasonable accuracy. 🙂 But it is true that the defintion for the term is too loose. I have seen many arguments on who qualifies and who doesn’t.
But if there is a word, then should it not have a reasonably definable definition. If Visu or Hari have a unique stamp why are they not auteurs? What is the other half of the definition of this elusive word?
LikeLiked by 1 person
brangan
October 24, 2014
Sutheesh Kumar. P. S.: Dammit. You’re right! 😀
Rahini David: I have some thoughts. Will come back to this later.
LikeLike
Rahul
October 31, 2014
In my opinion the auteur should have done something innovative. It is his personal stamp in a way that differentiates himself from other directors , and also it contributes something substantial to the language of cinema , in form or content.
LikeLike