Spoilers ahead…
For a while, One Night Stand plays out exactly like you expect it to. Gauzy red scarves brushing against skin. Horny men in Phuket. And a hookup. He’s Urvil (Tanuj Virwani). She’s Celina (Sunny Leone). His name means “sea.” Her name means “sky.” When he begins to flirt with her, she says sadly, “The sea can never meet the sky.” He pulls out his trump card. With a knowing smile, he points to the horizon, which may be something of a metaphor. The sky lies on top of the sea. In a few minutes, it’s no longer a metaphor. Celina is on top of Urvil. It’s one of those sex situations that exists only in the movies. The makeup remains intact. The bodies are perfectly depilated. There’s not a trace of sweat or exertion. There’s no “do this,” “faster,” “shit, do you have a condom?”, “no, not there, higher.” The bodies aren’t slapping against one another and tearing apart with Velcro-made-of-flesh sounds. The whole thing has an aerodynamic feel to it, like sex in space; people glide over one another in slow motion, and a tastefully arched back lets us know when it’s over. This is what it’d be like if Jane Austen wrote the screenplay for an Emmanuelle sequel. I half expected someone to ring a bell, so a butler could tiptoe in and gather the sheets.
This isn’t a plea for more realistic sex in the movies. This is just curiosity. Maybe thirty years ago, in the era of furtive peeks at Debonair centrefolds, these scenes may have been enough. But when porn is everywhere, who is going to watch a one-night stand that features about as much “nudity” as you’d find in a swimming pool? More curiosity. Who decides that it’s okay to say “fuck,” but “asshole” needs to be muted? Anyway, given the title (with its missing hyphen), we realise that this hookup is headed for a full stop. And given the trailer, which practically gives away the whole story, you know Urvil has a wife (Simran, played by Nyra Banerjee) waiting for him back in India. But a few days later, he finds he cannot get Celina out of his mind. And then, when shopping with Simran, he runs into Celina, who sees the couple and quickly looks away. You think she’s shocked that he’s married, that he lied to her. You think she’s Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction, standing in for all femalehood, hell-hath-no-furious at being cast off so thoughtlessly, at being considered either a trophy sex object (at best) or a slut (at worst).
And this is when the movie, written by Bhavani Iyer, gets really interesting. Urvil plays the Glenn Close character. He’s the one obsessed. Like most on-screen cheaters, he looked at Celina as a sex object/slut – even his flirtation with her came about because a friend made a bet that he couldn’t “get” her. She’s not the first woman he’s had outside his marriage. There have been many, and when a friend asks him about it, he says he loves his wife and he’ll never let these flings breach the walls of his marriage. You want to smash a fist into his smug self-righteousness. Underneath this “logical” explanation, you sense quite a bit of pride, the kind that’s evident in good-looking men who know they can get good-looking women and still return home to a loving wife who packs lunch dabbas to take to work. Imagine what a blow to the balls it is, then, when Urvil discovers Celina is married.
When it comes to straying women in Indian cinema, there’s always a because. Rekha strayed in Silsila because the man was rightfully hers before his sense of duty made him marry another woman (or maybe she thought, “Let me lure him away from her at least in a movie”). Mallika Sherawat strayed in Murder because she was lonely and neglected and hers, too, was a marriage born out of a sense of duty. Rani Mukerji strayed in Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna because she was a mature woman married to a man-child – they were just wrong together. But Celina is happy. Her husband loves her. She dotes on their son. She’s attentive to her father-in-law. She is, in short, the kind of wife/daughter-in-law who’d be played by Renuka Shahane in a Sooraj Barjatya movie.
And though the film doesn’t underline this, you can see why Urvil is so upset. He’s the type who hires a rotund woman as his assistant because a “sexy secretary” would be temptation. (The prospect that someone could find this rotund woman attractive is unimaginable to him.) He is what some people in some circles would call a “typical male.” Earlier, Urvil was just fantasising about his encounter with Celina, he was just obsessing about the sex. But now, he sees she’s married to another man. In his fantasises, she was his and his alone, but in reality, she “belongs” to someone else. He thought he “used” her to alleviate the sameness that seeps into every marriage, but now he sees that she used him too, possibly for those same reasons. And this spoils his fantasy. His whore is a Madonna who, for a brief moment, acted like a “man.” She got her rocks off and now she wants nothing more to do with him. What an idea, madam-ji!
But what a missed opportunity. This is subject for a major movie, and by casting Sunny Leone (and with that title), you’re practically holding up a card in front of the theatre: COME IN FOR SOME SLEAZY KICKS. And how clueless does someone have to be to strike a blow for sexual equality and then close the film with a Sunny Leone item number that neon-highlights why men like Urvil think the way they do about women like Celina? Simran is an interesting character too. We see she knew about Urvil’s affairs, and she gets a good line: “This is the one I’m leaving you for.” But again, the casting, the plasticky staging – I’ve never seen this much eye-shadow on a woman slicing onions in the kitchen. How much better One Night Stand would have been with better actors, a more committed filmmaker than Jasmine Moses D’souza! The film is neither a gripping domestic drama nor a twisted psychological thriller. It’s just one for the history books, the first time a happily married heroine decided to act on an urge to sleep with a stranger. She isn’t punished either. Or even if she is, it happens off-screen. The guy, on the other hand, isn’t so lucky. He’s left with nothing but his dick in his hand.
KEY:
Copyright ©2016 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Rahini David
May 9, 2016
Do butlers tip toe in and gather sheets?
LikeLiked by 5 people
MANK
May 9, 2016
Rocking review Brangan, full of gems , dunno which one to pick. had a hearty laugh
loved this one at poor Rekha’s expense
or maybe she thought, “Let me lure him away from her at least in a movie”
and quite baffled by this one
The guy, on the other hand, isn’t so lucky. He’s left with nothing but his dick in his hand.
Err. you mean that literally? !
LikeLike
priyazzillionthoughts
May 9, 2016
I burst out laughing at the last line! And I couldn’t help notice the missing hyphen in the title too (first thing I noticed in the promos). Whattodo? Occupational hazard, boss.
LOL! The A-word is beeped and not the F-word?
Sounds like a good premise gone waste, as always. And its not even a “Visesh Films Present” product. No hopes of good music either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sanjana
May 9, 2016
Now roles are written for Sunny leone, a privilege few heroines can boast of.
LikeLiked by 6 people
lakshmi
May 9, 2016
Rahini : The tiptoeing is to maintain the continuity of the scene. But why gather unrumpled sheets?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sifter
May 9, 2016
-Tiptoeing butler and the lines preceding that. Would the butler be thinking about the lack of sweat and such that? Couldn’t control my laughter imagining that.
Regarding Rekha…The smoking cat of stardust came to mind when I read it 🙂 🙂
The concept of this is interesting…alas gone to dust.
Good thing is that roles are getting written for Sunny Leone now. And mainstream. Incredible.
As noted, that damn last line.
LikeLike
The British Asian Blog
May 9, 2016
I can’t help but think the storyline would have been greatly enhanced if the actors in it were slightly more famous. I think it will be a shame that such storyline will be wasted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vikram
May 9, 2016
BR, rollicking review….erm…about the eye shadow while slicing onions bit….was it more than the nayantara eyelashes that keep making special appearances in your reviews.. . :-))
LikeLike
venkatesh
May 9, 2016
Oh my word BR.
I believe this is the review with the largest number of non-innuendo direct phallic word usage.
Kudos.
LikeLike
Rohit Sathish Nair
May 9, 2016
You actually thought of catching this one, Sir? Try skipping some of these (though, of course, these bring out your funniest reviews) and catch a Malayalam film
PS: Really sorry if you find my request for a Malayalam film review now and then to be irritating
LikeLike
Rohit Sathish Nair
May 10, 2016
I didn’t really mean this film, but say, Uyire Uyire didn’t do anything for you
LikeLike
Rahul
May 10, 2016
In Basu Bhattacharya’s Aastha, Rekha fits this profile.
LikeLike
Rohit Sathish Nair
May 10, 2016
I do understand that this one wasn’t as much a bust as say, Uyire Uyire, but, we’d certainly like more ‘Sairat’s for sure
LikeLike
brangan
May 10, 2016
Rahul: Not really. IIRC, Aastha was about a bored housewife who wanted material things — so that’s definitely a “because.” Two, it was not exactly a mainstream movie, in the sense that artier films get away with this kind of stuff more easily as they slip under the radar of the moral majority.
That said, no denying the taboo-breaking aspect of Aastha either. BTW, did interviews or reviews of the time stress on the Belle de Jour similarities?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rahul
May 10, 2016
BR, going by this review, Sunny Leone acted on her carnal impulse, while Rekha was a bored housewife , so yes, not quite the same. Similar though, in the aspect that both did not want to change their relationship status and both did it of their free will. Rekha`s financial circumstances were not medicines for a dying mother type and I think a freudian case can be made that it was a convenient excuse for her to exercise her sexual fantasies.
It seems at least a couple of people made the connection with the Bunuel masterpiece.
LikeLiked by 1 person
hari ohm
May 12, 2016
do you think it is inspired by “up in the air” the george clooney one? “spoilers ahead” especially the scene where clooney goes to chicago to meet the women and finds out that she is married?
LikeLike
Jagajaga
May 13, 2016
@Brangan – on a scale of 1 to 10, how horny were you when you wrote the first paragraph?
“no, not there, higher.” stands out!!
On another note – your quip on Jane Austen writing the screenplay for an Emmanuelle sequel is just god-awesome! The narcissist in me hates to praise others – especially for their writing; but this line puts you on a different pedestal. It emphasizes everything that should constitute good writing:
(a) Knowledge of subject matter – One should know both Emmanuelle and Pride & prejudice.
(b) Connect the dots between apparently unconnected themes – opens up your readers to new perspectives.
(c) simplicity of expression – what a direct way to hit the point home!
I thoroughly enjoyed that sentence.
In the movie itself, wish they had shown more boobs.
LikeLiked by 2 people