P.O.T. (PRETTY OLD THING)
FEB 17, 2008 – DO YOU HAVE A PAPER BAG NEAR YOU? Good. Now, before you read any further, take deep breaths into it and count to ten slowly. Feeling calm? Okay, here’s the news (and you’d better be sitting down for this): Thriller has been re-released to commemorate its twenty-fifth anniversary. When I first read about this, I thought they had the math wrong. I mean, albums of The Beatles and The Rolling Stones celebrate silver jubilees, along with well-scratched LPs from The Carpenters. Cliff Richards you can imagine as someone who put out a record a quarter of a century ago. But Michael Jackson? Wasn’t he King of Pop just yesterday, when we were screwing stubby little pencils into compasses and trying to create perfect circles for our geometry exams? So 1982 is really that far back? And if Moonwalking were a person, he’d be a strapping young adult today, out of college and neck-deep in a fulltime career and getting ready to tie the knot? So how old does that make us? Now you see the need for that paper bag?
Speaking of great pop soundtracks of The Most Maligned Decade Ever – and closer home – do you realise Biddu’s Star has turned 25 too? Yes, I’m afraid so. It’s really been that long since Jaana, where Kumar Gaurav and Rati Agnihotri expressed undying love to one another by zipping themselves up in tinfoil spacesuits and performing somersaults in the vicinity of exploding nebulae. It isn’t everyday that I’d freely admit to being crazy about numbers that go Boom Boom and Ooie Ooie, but we’re talking silver anniversary, dammit, and this is no time for shame. (Besides, if you’ve lived through the eighties, it’s a fairly established fact that the good taste police didn’t get to you.) And this isn’t just nostalgia. All that waxing in this column last week about muscle-men heroes of the eighties, triggered by a viewing of the new Rambo movie – now that was nostalgia, nothing more. The only reason I wanted to see this movie now is that I saw the earlier installments once upon a time.
But Thriller and Star aren’t just relics to be dusted off and lovingly examined under rose-tinted eyepieces, before packing them back into silica-gel storage. These are great albums, period. The instinctive reaction to a track from the eighties is to snigger and point out that they were built on strident synth loops and nothing else – yes, Bananarama, I’m talking about you – but Thriller is a thrilling mix of pop and funk and R&B and disco and even rock. And Star, what a fascinating curio it is in the annals of Hindi film music – unbelievably lush melodies harking back to earlier decades (strip away the arrangements, and you can imagine a Rafi, say, launching into Teri zindagi mein yun to kai dard aayenge), but rooted in the studio-controlled, machine-made aesthetic that anticipates the AR Rahman era by almost an entire decade. Sure, RD Burman was doing a lot of work on synths too, but Star sounded like nothing before, and sounds – even today – like very little since. Then again, I’m hardly the authority on the music of since. As I write this, rapper Kanye West and British soul singer Amy Winehouse are expected to dominate this year’s Grammies. But for their names, there isn’t a thing of theirs I’ve heard.
Copyright ©2008 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Aditya Pant
February 16, 2008
Being nostalgic about Star, are we? Count me in 🙂 I heard it when I had just started the second decade of my life, but I just cannot forget that album even today. Can’t say the same thing about the film though.
LikeLike
Bala
February 16, 2008
too too short 😦 I was expecting this piece to go on for some length .Instead , it’s over before it even got started:(
LikeLike
Shankar
February 16, 2008
I always get nostalgic when I listen to Star and even Disco Deewane. I remember I “burnt” a cassette out of an LP my friend had and loved the “new” sound Biddu produced. Baddy, you are right. It was a precursor to the ARR era…surely Biddu must count as a pathbreaker in his own right. Besides, the other factor was Nazia!! Though she had her share of critics, she did capture the imagination of the nation!! I loved her. Bless her soul.
LikeLike
Sagarika
February 17, 2008
brangan: While the words “Biddu” and “Star” left me feeling fairly clueless, your mentions of “Jaanaa,” “Kumar Gaurav” and “Rati Agnihotri” instantly transported me back to the Bollywood-of-the-80s time warp, so I’m now able to clearly place the cosmic cluster you talk about. 🙂
And Thriller…Its very mention says to my heart: “Just Beat It! Simply love it, love it, love it.
LikeLike
brangan
February 17, 2008
Aditya Pant: “Can’t say the same thing about the film though.” What are you saying? Kumar Gaurav? rati? padmini Kolhapure? Bad haircuts? Pedal pushers? Really, what’s not to like? 😉
Bala: uh, sorry…
Shankar: “It was a precursor to the ARR era…” And the funny thing is it was the ONLY precursor. It came out of nowhere, created a sensation, and vanished without leaving behind any discernible trends. Odd.
Sagarika: Another comment? Hmmmm… 🙂
LikeLike
Bala
February 17, 2008
:)It’s a sad thing about whacko jacko (though to be really frank , I won’t say the same about other 80s music 🙂 ).He got himself lost at the end of it all ,with the gloves,the masks,the marriages,the dangling kids ,the surgeries..and oh did I mention kids ?The present pop “talent” isn’t a patch on his work and I mean even the worst of it.Speaking of music did you read this ?
http://www.naachgaana.com/2008/01/05/rafi-wasnt-able-to-grasp-the-nuances%E2%80%A6-rd-burman/
I was shocked, though I can’t think of too many R.D=Rafi songs, so I guess it shouldn’t have been a surprise.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
February 17, 2008
@Bala: All MDs have their favorite singers. I remember Sajjad Hussain, the maverick music director calling Talat Mahmood as “Ghalat” Mahmood and Kishore Kumar as “Shor” Kumar. So I’m not surprised that RD didn’t think much of Rafi.
Having said that, I would take the exact statement with a pinch of salt because I see Raju Bharatan as a person who pushed his own agenda through his articles. Not that he had anything against Rafi, just that I wuldn’t take him seriously.
Another thing: RDB has himself noted that when the Mere Naina song from Mehbooba was to be recorded Kishore didn’t get that it was based on Shivaranjini, etc….and asked RDB to first record with Lata and he would follow that. So, KK had his limitations as well.
LikeLike
Shankar
February 17, 2008
Baddy, I’ve heard that the politics of then Bollywood industry drove Biddu back to the safe haven of London. It also didn’t help that Star (the movie) was a massive flop.
LikeLike
brangan
February 18, 2008
Bala: I wouldn’t put too much faith in these pieces that try to pick one singer as the best. Asha, Lata, Rafi and Kishore ruled Hindi film music for a long time, and each had a great number of songs you cannot imagine sung by any of the others. Besides, how much has RD really used Rafi to make this kind of generalisation, (if he indeed did)? Based on the Naag Devta song in Shalimar?
Aditya Pant: Okay, this urban legend is something I’ve never been convinced by. So big deal, it was based on Shivaranjani. But then, didn’t KK take to, say, Pahadi in Kora kagaz tha yeh man mera or Bhairavi in Hamein tumse pyaar kitna? Maybe Mere naina is a bit more intricate, but what was there in the song that this expert mimic found so daunting? It’s not even filled with fast taans and such, the phrases are all leisurely drawn out. Where’s the problem? Phew, had to get that off my chest. 🙂
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
February 18, 2008
BR: You got me wrong. My only purpose was to say the MDs might say certain things about singers in different contexts, which does not go on to mean that one singer is greater than the other. If RDB said something about Rafi, he also did about KK, who is belived to be his pet singer.
LikeLike
Bala
February 18, 2008
Oh,My grouse wasn’t against the article as such. Comparisons are odious and all that , it’s just that I couldn’t believe R.D saying something like this (if it were true ) , against Rafi .But then again , I guess every director does/can have his favs :). (and I haven’t heard the Naag Devta song in Shalimar :), unfortunately 🙂 )
LikeLike
brangan
February 18, 2008
Aditya: No, but seriously, I’d like to know what the big deal is about that (admittedly beautiful) song that KK felt LM had to render it first. What am I missing here? I just don’t get it.
Bala: If you haven’t heard it, stay away 🙂
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
February 18, 2008
BR: i don’t get it either. 🙂 just repeating what RDB says in one of the compilations. I’m sure you would have heard it as well.
LikeLike
raj
March 5, 2008
ah! yes, what was there about Mere naina to fluster Kishore Kumar?
Can’t fathom. Besides, wasnt the KK version definitively better and more popular than Lata’s version in this case?
Atleast, among people I knew, Kishore’s version was more popular and I didnt know for a long time that there was a Lata version. Aditya might have sampled a bigger hindi-film-listening population to bust my theory, though 🙂
And yes, how can anyone take Raju Bharatan seriously?
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
March 8, 2008
Raj – Oh no, even if i sample a “bigger’ population the result would just be the same. I also prefer the KK version to Lata’s.
If I want to compare two versions of the same song – one by KK and one by Lata – to show Lata’s version was better, I would pick a diferent song (another RDB composition), not Mere Naina. which one? let’s leave that for now 😉
LikeLike