MY BLOODY VALENTINE
A delectably mounted, dramatically inert black comedy has lots of atmosphere and little else.
FEB 20, 2011 – IF YOU WERE BORN BEFORE the information age and if you grew up addicted to those quaint clusters of printed paper called books, you are already familiar with the process of adaptation – the sentences on page transformed into words and visuals in the head, and you had your own little movie up and running. The process of making an actual movie, however, is a little different, and it involves the quest for the “cinematic.” Even cookbooks and self-help guides can make us form pictures in the head, but who, really, wants to see movies of cookbooks and self-help guides? And thus we define the cinematic book, one that is inherently capable of making the transition to cinema – and all good books, all good stories, aren’t necessarily candidates for good cinema. Ruskin Bond’s Susanna’s Seven Husbands, I suspect, is one such book – short story, rather – and this suspicion arises from Vishal Bhardwaj’s delectably mounted but dramatically inert 7 Khoon Maaf, a coal-black comedy about Susanna’s (Priyanka Chopra) search for the perfect husband.
The film plays like the life of Elizabeth Taylor crossed with The Picture of Dorian Gray – Susanna moves from one husband to another, murdering the previous before marrying the next, and each of her sins, each man, seems to leave a mark on her. As her journey progresses, as time passes – marked by the evocation of events from recent Indian history, like the demolition of Babri Masjid, or the successful nuclear tests – she deteriorates both physically and mentally, with shrivelling skin and a screwed-up mind. The victims of love include a one-legged army man who possesses, we’re told, all the qualities of the typical Indian husband (he’s boring, insecure, suspicious and flatulent, and he’s played by Neil Nitin Mukesh), a rock star with a penchant for wigs and lingerie (John Abraham), a soulful poet with a sadomasochistic streak (Irrfan Khan), a Russian who’s possibly a double agent (Aleksandr Dyachenko), an alternative medicine man who knows his mushrooms a little too well (Naseeruddin Shah), a mousy cop who, with Viagra, begins to roar (Annu Kapoor), and finally, a mystery man who’s hinted at throughout the film by the tolling of church bells.
You couldn’t get more colourful characters if the script had fallen into a kindergarten class having its first tryst with oils, and 7 Khoon Maaf – at its best – feels like a rambling anecdote with a killer punch line. At its worst, though, it’s a lumpily episodic indulgence, with the actors and the director straining to divert our attention from the reality that it’s just the same thing happening over and over and over. The opening is certainly dramatic (and like the rest of the film, beautifully staged) – a tear-stained cheek, a shaking hand with a loaded gun, a shot, and a wall spattered with dripping blood, like a Jackson Pollock canvas in its early stages. But once the first husband dies, and the second one follows, and then the third, and we’re left, at interval point, with the reminder that there are four more to go, the heart sinks. Is that all there is, we wonder – atmosphere passed off as action?
Those who have read Susanna’s Seven Husbands may be in a better position to judge why such a thrilling premise has resulted in such tiring cinema, but I’d wager that this is simply not a cinematic book. Just as an anecdote loses its flavour when you try to explain it, so a short story can be leached of life when padded out to feature length. Maybe there just isn’t any way to capture, cinematically, the tone of a tale that’s so bizarre it can unfold convincingly only inside our heads, where the visuals are only half-formed and therefore capable of accommodating any kind of narrative perverseness, and instead, when presented with the vulgarity of fully-formed visuals, maybe all we’re left with is congealed whimsy. The set pieces include a shirtless fight with whips, a massage ministered to someone whose head rests on a dead leopard’s, and death by earth-shattering orgasm. Did I mention snakes being fed milk and venerated as naag devta by a practicing Christian? Is there any way to make a movie of this material?
When the text isn’t compelling, we begin to scan the margins for scribbled notes – and the Vishal Bhardwaj flourishes keep us watching. We observe the references to literature – not only in the winking display of Anatole France’s The Seven Wives of Bluebeard, but also in the Russian spouse’s name being an amalgam of the names of two different characters from Anna Karenina. We smile at the rhapsodic tendencies of the young narrator (Vivaan Shah, Naseeruddin’s son) who’s as much in thrall to Susanna as the other men, much older. (Seeing her move in a black dress, he recalls snow falling quietly on the mountains.) We laugh at the wicked touches – the silken segues from marriage to death (in one instance, after the “till death do us part” vows are declared), the unexpected cut on television from a rock show to a programme about bovines (something familiar to everyone who grew up with black-and-white-era Doordarshan), the teasing wordplay (a man who returns to Susanna a “keemti cheez” turns out to bear the name Keemat), and of course, the spectacular marriage of music and meaning in the songs. (The rambunctious Darling may be the number topping the charts, but the film’s heart resides in Yeshu, whose swelling refrain we first hear when the title appears in the opening credits.)
But these diversions do little to mask the question voiced by the narrator: Why does Susanna kill these men? Why doesn’t she simply leave them? By way of a reply, we are presented the anecdote of a man accosted by a rabid dog on the road, and instead of taking another road, he proceeds to blow the canine’s brains out and carry on. He’s, thus, not only making the road safe for him but for future travellers. Perhaps Susanna is doing something similar. Stuck with rotten men, she’s perhaps making the world safer for other women who might end up similarly starved of love if she allowed these men to survive – she is, therefore, something of a feminist heroine. And that’s a terrific conceit for a black comedy – a woman scorned dispatching, with fury, her men to hell. But Susanna is also troublingly sentimentalised as someone to whom love is a mirage, someone we’re meant to sympathise with. As much as a mystery as she is, the bigger mystery is whether we’re supposed to laugh with her or cry for her.
Copyright ©2011 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
rameshram
February 19, 2011
mine.
http://rameshram.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/saath-khoon-maaf-bharadwaj-2011/
LikeLike
pr3m
February 19, 2011
Cool review. No mention for Piggy Chops, though? I thought she killed it in this. Especially at the end, when she was gonna drink his blood!
LikeLike
Hari
February 19, 2011
I had a somewhat similar experience while watching ‘blue umbrella’ though found that visually evocative and was impressed with the performances of the young girl and Pankaj Kapur. Guess the innocence of a short story(more so when it has been written by someone who specializes in writing features for children) gets somewhere lost when it is made into a full-length feature, a telefilm or stories shown as series(suno kahani, katha sagar etc.) might be more appropriate.
Have not read the story but I suppose it was written having crime-thriller loving teenage readership in mind.
LikeLike
Rahul
February 19, 2011
Vishal seems to be a well read guy and he leaves these nuggets of influence from literature and film here and there – which elevates this movie from simply being a vehicle of the script. “Madame” is obviously picked up from Poirot and Arun’s “Saheb” is ostensibly a nod to the Guru Dutt classic , Sahib Biwi aur Ghulam – in fact there are more similarities than one with that movie.
To me, as you said, before interval the story seemed bereft of intrigue and drama.The second half worked better for me , partly due to the chemistry between Arun and Susanna and partly due to the ending which was peppered with religious allusions and metaphors.
To me, her final marriage kind of provided an albeit wacky , but justification of the neuroses of Susanna’s character.The potential of interpretation is endless when religion is introduced in the mix. I think this movie had the potential of starting a biblical treasure hunt of symbols a la Machinist or Da Vinci code.For eg. “This time I will drink his blood” is a reference to the communion. What I didn’t get is the reference to the cracked glass of Arun. All in all, the ambiguity in the second half made up a little bit for the banality of the first half.
Talking about the casting, when I heard about Vivaan I thought this is yet another instance of Vishal doing a favor to one of his friends by giving a chance to their talentless kids like Shahid Kapoor but I am happy to say I was proved wrong. This guy is a great find. His voice has a great texture and I think he has been observing his father closely.I believe a lot of distinctive character definition is accomplished at the time of dubbing and it is heartening to see that Vivaan realizes its importance; or it was foisted upon his as the narrator.
I found NNM to be excellent too; but wonder what is it with Vishal to have so much faith in non actors like Shahid Kapoor and now Priyanka Chopra? I don’t think she was bad but perhaps this role required a more method approach by someone with real talent like Tabu or Vidya Balan rather than just a competent performer.
Also, I think Irfan and Naseer, great actors as they are, are becoming complacent. They have to find new ways to recreate their characters – their performances seemed mailed in and predictable.
LikeLike
GR
February 19, 2011
That last story about the rabid dog was actually Susanna herself. The servants called her “saheb”.
I’ve read Susanna’s Seven Husbands and I was actually quite happy with the way the film turned out. Most of the detailing and material in the film wasn’t there in the short story which is only about 5-6 pages long. Most of Susanna’s husbands in the story were apparently fortune hunters marrying her for her wealth. There were no individual fatal flaws that are shown in the movie. What I liked about the film though was that I think it captured the atmosphere of the scary Ruskin Bond stories. They were always a bit on the surreal side.
Also, Keemat Lal is a police officer that makes repeat appearances in Ruskin Bond’s stories but wasn’t there in Susanna’s Seven Husbands.
LikeLike
Abhirup
February 19, 2011
Great writing, as always. I agree with your take entirely. It’s a pity, really, that the film is this disappointing. I was really looking forward to this one, for given the premise, the director and the cast, there was every reason to expect something impressive.
I have read ‘Susanna’s Seven Husbands’, and I think that the story works so well because it describes the murders in a way that makes it clear that Susanna is the killer, and yet refrains from stating so directly. For example, one of the husbands is described as being bitten by a snake that was in his bedroom, and it is also mentioned that Susanna had an odd rapport with serpents, but we are never told that it was she who released the snake into the room. Similarly, another husband is described as having died of cholera, though, the narrator says, being fed arsenic results in the same symptoms. It is this tantalizing quality that Bhardwaj should have reproduced in the film. He certainly seemed to be going that way, when it is said that the first husband might have slipped and fallen prey to the panther, or he might have been pushed off the tree. But thereafter, the murders are shown in too literal and direct a fashion, with Naseeruddin Shah’s killing being the worst one. Had Bhardwaj remained more faithful to the tone and narratorial style of Bond’s tale, I think the film would have been more gripping and interesting, despite the fact that “it’s just the same thing happening over and over and over.”
I also feel that the casting should have been better. I wonder why useless pretty boys like Neil Nitin Mukesh and John Abraham found their way into a Vishal Bhardwaj film: had those roles been played by Kay Kay Menon and Saif Ali Khan, for instance, I think the characters would have been more intriguing.
Speaking of the actors, you haven’t said anything about the performances. What did you think of the actors? Did they work for you?
A small correction: that story about the shooting of a rabid dog did not concern “a man.” It was Susanna’s story: it was she who, as a child, shot the dog dead with her father’s revolver. The butler narrated this story to explain that just as she removed the obstacle (the mad dog) rather than take another road, she similarly prefers to bump off her her troublesome and abusive spouses rather than leave them. In other words, if anything torments her, she eradicates it.
I agree, though, with your concluding remark: that Susanna should simply have remained a femme fatale rather than a lovelorn woman. Or at least, the lovelorn aspect should have been revealed later on, when she grows old, and grows weary of having blood on her hands. Showing her as pining for true love right from the beginning indeed made it tough to decide whether we should take pleasure in her getting rid of her unworthy husbands, or feel sorry about the fact that she hasn’t found a true soulmate.
Thanks a lot for giving us these wonderful pieces.
Honestly, I can’t thank you enough for them.
LikeLike
Abhirup
February 19, 2011
Another question: what did you think of the ‘seventh husband’? Did that part work, according to you?
LikeLike
Aurora Vampiris
February 20, 2011
Hehe. So… (I feel very sociopathic and misanthropic right now, so forgive my inappropriateness), is the gore any good? Is it as great and psychotic (i.e. of cult-ish sensibility) as Christian Bale’s American Psycho?
LikeLike
Sandhya
February 20, 2011
At least Vishal is building an ouevre that he can reflect back on with pride. Let’s see…the man reads (gasp!) real literature, is firmly loyal to perhaps the last real poet-lyricist of this generation (Gulzar)… buys copyrights the legitimate way instead of transliterating into Hindi a Hollywood DVD of choice…gets a mainer-than-mainstream Bollywood beauty queen at the height of her career to try her hand at real acting(double gasp!!) and gets Ruskin Bond to do a cameo, as opposed to inserting a Malaika Arora number…if that’s not a true outlier, then I don’t know who is…For that alone, many khoons maaf!
LikeLike
SLB
February 20, 2011
I love the way in which all you VB fanboys have presented your (rather concealed) criticism of the movie. You can’t really call it a BAD movie directly – afterall its Vishal! So what to do? Ah I know – you thought lets just suger coat it while trying to explain how bad the movie sucks! Loser.
LikeLike
bran1gan
February 20, 2011
rameshram: Good to see a defender. Have there been any other raves?
pr3m / : I did write about the performances – “with the actors and the director straining to divert our attention…”
Abhirup / GR: For some reason I thought the butler was narrating that dog-in-the-road anecdote about himself (when he was younger), one which commented indirectly on Saaheb’s choices. Hmm…. And yes, the seventh husband worked big-time. That’s why I called it a “killer punch line.”
Rahul: Yes, the film did get better in the second half, especially as it turns more baroque-religious. Can someone say who the last husband in the story was? (WITH A SPOILER ALERT). Thanks.
Sandhya: Of course. It’s not as if he made a Housefull, and after a series of good to great films, anyone is allowed a misstep, especially one as carefully wrought as this one. Whatever its faults, it’s certainly not a lazy film.
LikeLike
bksingh2009
February 20, 2011
MAYBE SPOILER: The seventh murder referred to the killing of Jesus, didn’t it? I too felt the same way, but many people say that the seventh murder is that of Usha Uthupp. BTW, I was terribly bored by the movie
LikeLike
rameshram
February 20, 2011
no no I haven’t thats why the last line ! 😀
LikeLike
rameshram
February 20, 2011
and like I said in my review, the seventh murder was of Suzanna the serial killer. vishaal seemd to be saying that God was responsible for the other six murders.
vampire: no gore.
LikeLike
rameshram
February 20, 2011
notice Jesus does exactly like wasaullah khan?
LikeLike
Jimmy
February 20, 2011
A very pretentious, boring piece of cinema. Vishal Bhardwaj’s turning into another Sanjay Leela Bhansali, and that’s a pity.
The ending wasn’t so bad, I agree, but wish he hadn’t made Suzie do that little trance-dance with Jesus in the end. Robbed the moment of its subtlety, precious little as it was, and made the movie go back to being mediocre.
Through it all, I really couldn’t help but wonder if Vishal was trying to pull off some kind of a weird spoof. Everybody — right from Neil Nitin Mukesh to the bumbling Russian double agent to Usha Utthup — were badly drawn caricatures, mouthing stuff like ‘Main tum se Amar Prem karrta hoon!’ and blah.
Totally disagree with your contention that Saat Khoon Maaf is a coal-black comedy. Coal-black, yes, but comedy? Or maybe I’m just losing my sense of humour.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
February 20, 2011
“Delectably mounted but dramatically inert” is the perfect way to describe this film. It is the cinematic equivalent of Aishwarya Rai, absolutely beautiful but plastic 🙂
This is a film that was definitely not satifying, but one that I will surely watch one more time (when the DVD comes out) because of Vishal’s directorial touches.
For me as well, the second half worked better, especially the 7th husband and “this time I will drink his blood” bit! It was also great to see Usha Uthup on screen and Ruskin Bond in a cameo.
What did you think about Vivaan Shah? I felt he has a HUGE influence of his father when it comes to his dialogue delivery and it doesn’t seem to suit his persona. To me, that did not work.
And the dog tale was definitely about Susanna’s childhood!
LikeLike
Udhav
February 20, 2011
Usha Utup?
I thought the seventh murder was of herself! The killing of her own self by becoming a nun….married to Jesus who she can’t even kill.
LikeLike
bran1gan
February 20, 2011
Aditya Pant: Did Tere liye make it to screen? It’s an exquisite song and I don’t remember it. BTW, after Guzaarish, this is the second film with a great soundtrack that the filmmaker didn’t do justice to. With lesser filmmakers I wouldn’t have felt it because they wouldn’t be able to marry the emotional content of songs with appropriate visuals anyway. But here, you feel they’ve come up short!
Yes, there’s definitely more here than you catch in one viewing. I suspect this will be one of those films I’m going to be watching in parts, whenever it plays on TV or something.
BTW, I’ve given trying to add spoiler alerts. Read comments at your own risk!
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 20, 2011
A bad film! No way. In fact I like it more than Maqbool, Omkara and Kaminey . ( Haven’t seen Blue Umbrella). “lots of atmosphere and little else.”? I beg to differ. For a starter, there are a gallery of interesting characters. Then there is s much to reflect on: Woman’s willingness to believe in love and Man’s propensity to shatter that belief. And the thought that true love is possible only with the Lord as Meera would have told us. And why does one have to take the woman murdering the 7 husbands literally? ( Though the mad dog anecdote provides an escape route.)It is a metaphorical telling. One can think of What if she had looked for love with any ne of these men in alternative tellings of the story.
Here is my immediate impression after seeing it late last night
:
Just back from 7 Khoon Maaf. Very atmospheric. Works wonderfully through its production and sound design. Priyanka is good and so are all the co-actors…..Usha Uthup was a nice surprise . Loved all the husbands. The ending was very well-conceived and executed, giving the film its metaphoric soul.
I found it thoroughly engaging. Did not find the predictability a problem at all. A film that has the interval announcement as ‘ Four more to go..’ . obviously does not want to keep the impending murders as a suspense. True, the first half is breezier compared to the second, but that’s because it has the younger husbands and a younger Priyanka. And it isn’t all sombre and serious. The quirky characters and the little antics of Nick and Keemat Lal are amusing enough. I wish Gulzar’s shayaris for wasiulla Khan were a little more accessible though.
Contrary to what some critics have written, it is not a straight linear narrative. What gives the film its texture is its rich visual design, investing every scene with another layer of meaning. . The change of locales ( especially the snowy Kashmir) breaks the monotony. The character of Arun ( Vivan Shah), the photograph of the young Susan with her father in front of their Puducherry house, and the final dance….create a thread of meaning that ties the whole story together.
After I have seen the film and going over the reviews of people like Masand, Raja Sen and Khalid Mohammad convinces me that they dont understand a thing about abstraction. ( Masand gave No Smoking 0 stars and Dev D 2 stars.) Not surprising in a film world where Chak De is thought of as the height of creative achievement.
In terms of pure entertainment I enjoyed it more than the earlier three Bhardwaj films which seemed laboured and trying too hard to be good cinema or just cool. This one to me appeared more personal, more evolved, more well-rounded.
LikeLike
Abhirup
February 20, 2011
Thanks for your response, Mr. Rangan. The tale of the mad dog, though, was definitely Susanna’s story, not the butler’s. The butler was just narrating it.
And you still haven’t said anything about the performances. I would like to know which of the actors worked for you and which didn’t. I, for instance, felt that Neil and John were terrible, but the others did justice to their roles.
As for the (spoiler alert) seventh husband, I agree that the idea of Susanna ‘marrying’ Jesus was a terrific one, but don’t you think that the execution was kinda odd and usatisfactory? As someone else has pointed out, that dance with Christ robbed the final segment of the punch that it might have packed otherwise.
I will admit that I didn’t like the film. But given that this is the first time Bhardwaj has faltered, I am reluctant to write him off.
LikeLike
rameshram
February 20, 2011
I think this is one of Vishal’s best efforts. I think he topped maqbool with this one.
tell him ishquiya is forgiven, but he still needs to account for kaminay.
LikeLike
Aditya Pant
February 20, 2011
No, Tere Liye did not make it. I kept waiting for it!
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 20, 2011
@Abhirup: I thugh the dance with Jesus is what gave the film its punch and provided the metaphorical code for reading the film.And the accompanying track was a beauty too
LikeLike
Karan Bali
February 20, 2011
here’s one more review – http://www.upperstall.com/films/2011/7-khoon-maaf
LikeLike
Rahul
February 20, 2011
SPOILERS!!
About the 7th murder –
The most literal interpretation is that it was of Usha Uthup, but that doesn’t really appeal to me.For one, it was not a murder,strictly speaking, secondly, poetically its not as significant to be the climax in the series of murders.
The other obvious interpretation is that it was of Suzanna herself; as in, she did not exist as a separate soul once she is reunited with Jesus; but then this should be a liberating experience and she would hardly mention it as a murder , or sin. Then again, this reuniting with the Lord is stuff of Hindu theology as explained using concepts of Aatman and Brahman, and I don’t know if there is a similar idea in Christian theology.
The other interpretation, also theological, is that everyone who partakes of communion is forgiven of their sins but retroactively shares some blame for Jesus’s death, because apparently Jesus died for other’s sins.
The third interpretation, which is a spin on the second one , is that partaking of communion without a clear conscience is metaphorically equivalent to killing of Jesus – and what Susanna has done is taken a temporary refuge under the wings of the clergy and will reemerge again in the sequel 🙂
I am also going out on a limb and offering an explanation for Vivaan’s cracked glass- apparently it stands for the shattering of the spell that susanna held over him, he seems to have seen him as a petty criminal instead of an aura inspiring Goddess.
LikeLike
Swapnil
February 20, 2011
***SPOILER ALERT*** – 7th husband of susanna is—
Susanna converts to a nun, which implies that she is no one else’s but Lord Jesus’s ie. marries Jesus. Killing her seventh husband means she kills the jesus in herself hence committing suicide (not shown in the movie, but just that vivaan tells konkana in the end that she is now finally dead.)
The movie is bit slow in the 1st half but towards the end it gets the viewers to think about n scratch their heads… which Vishal has been making us do in all of his previous movies, kudos to him to make these kinds movies in spite of our dumb audience unable to anticipate those…!
LikeLike
Rahul
February 20, 2011
Then again, its possible that the cracked glass is a metaphor of the shattering of illusion that Susanna will ever come back to Vivaan in love- he has waited patiently for every other husband to pop off, but its hard to beat Jesus, eh?
Ok..thats my final thought on this film 🙂
LikeLike
Vishal
February 20, 2011
I think one of the biggest missteps that Vishal took in this movie was leaving the audience bereft of any emotional hook with the leading character. The moment I saw her luring her husband to his grave to bury him alive, I stopped caring about her. Her suffering and emotional plight had no effect on me after that point.
I think it would have worked better if the murders were not shown explicitly (as in the original story) — especially the way they killed the Russian (who delivered two of the funniest lines in the movie). The way they undertook killing the Russian was nothing less than despicable and psychotic.
Cutting the emotional thread between the audience and leading character was, IMO, VB’s biggest mistake. But since he has made such great movies in the past, I say “1 bhool maaf”! 🙂
BTW, is it just me who thought that Suzanna’s make-up in the later half was terribly unrealistic? Also, two songs in a raw (“O Mama!” and “Dil Dil Hai”) was totally unnecessary. And why, why did you have to show the Viagra label in a close-up? Even the dumbest person in the theater confirmed loudly that the pill was Viagra when it first appeared in Keemat’s palm. The time-line reminders – Babri Masjid, IC-814, Nuclear tests etc. – seemed forced and irrelevant to me.
LikeLike
Mona
February 21, 2011
i think u r right……………and drinking his blood is like when wine is drunken in the holy communion
LikeLike
Mona
February 21, 2011
yes i was a fascinating movie….for those who felt that it didnt meet the expectation coz they have read the book….well tough!!!! often movies cannot depict what a book tries to say. This was brilliant though…..
I agree with you that Masand et al like movies such as My Name is Khan which are over the top and have nothing to offer by shallow drama.
LikeLike
preet
February 21, 2011
Prefer a sad original than a copied masterpiece anyday. That doesn’t mean this one was sad, an original with an attempt to personalize. Kudos to VB for getting out of monotony.
LikeLike
Reshma
February 21, 2011
Did anyone else think that the Konkona Sen character’s reaction to finding out that her husband had lied to her about going to a conference was over the top? After several years of seeming marital harmony, would a seemingly sensible woman immediately jump to the conclusion that her husband’s having an affair? Even if the suspicion’s there, wouldn’t her expression of it be more muted in the beginning and then gain strength?
Also, why did the Russian insist on marriage even in the face of Susanna’s reluctance? He had a wife and family already so why not just be happy with a girlfriend on every shore?
LikeLike
bran1gan
February 21, 2011
Vishal: There is an emotional hook. She is a fairly sympathetic character — she nurtures that kid plus there’s all that stuff about her daddy. I think what you’re saying is that you weren’t convinced by her trajectory and therefore stopped caring.
Reshma: That Konkona character didn’t work for me at all. But her suspicion is understandable, no? After all, here’s this man who’s confessing non-stop to being anamoured by Susanna. It’s only natural to think that he’s finally run away to join her. I agree with the “muted in the beginning and then gain strength” but there are things in film you have to take on faith. Running time and several other considerations dictate that not everything can be fleshed out to the extent we want.
LikeLike
Shazia Masood
February 21, 2011
I was reading this and thought in my mind .. were you in the theatre with a pen and a paper.. or wait maybe a notebook or an Ipad… and if you hadn’t .. hats off to you for remembering even the minutest details.. but of course I didnt notice you were with the Indian Express and a well known critic!!
You echoed the same feelings I had … mixed feelings and an headache!!
I am sorry this comment was earlier posted on the wrong page by mistake 😛
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 22, 2011
One mistake many critics and viewers are making is in taking he narrative literally. I don’t think is supposed to take the seven husbands and seven murders literally. How normal or probable it is for any woman in our society to actually kill one’s husband and find another, pat, like that? Obviously it has to be seen as a parable. Happening in the surreal space. Perhaps in a woman’s mind, in the realm of possibilities. That is why the mundane details of build up of relationship is not dealt with.
LikeLike
Deboshree
February 22, 2011
That was a super review. Exceptionally well written and gripping. More gripping I have a feeling, than the film could be.
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 22, 2011
( An unpretentious but bang-on-target review by Apoorva at Chakpak.com)
Director Vishal Bhardwaj once again dares to embrace his dark side. And unlike the comparatively tame Omkara and the experimental Kameeney, he goes the full hog with this film. 7 Khoon Maaf is a starkly original drama that breaks the mould with its superb screenplay and a wonderful ensemble cast. Ruskin Bond’s short story is set to an offbeat tune by auteur Vishal, and the dialogue has a wickedly funny sting to it. The writing is laced with bitter truths about marriage and loneliness that few dare to address.
The 7 love stories with not so happy endings are narrated episodically, but in spite of knowing that each husband will die, the film is not predictable. Each death is constructed ingeniously and even though you know that Sussana has enough reason to want the man dead, it is difficult to find evidence that might implicate her. In fact, you feel sorry for the romance-seeking Sussana, who starts each new relationship with hope and innocence, trying her best make a success of the marriage. Sadly, each husband lets her down; some by breaking her trust and others by obsessing over her, leaving her with another shattered dream.
Of the seven husbands, Irrfan Khan makes the strongest impression. His story, set in Kashmir, sees him playing a sensitive poet by day who appears fully smitten by his muse, Sussana. But by night, another personality emerges from his shadow, one that knows only cruelty and violence as a way to love his woman. The other two actors who play their parts brilliantly are Annu Kapoor, as the love lorn Inpector Keemat Lal who cant seem to string a coherent sentence when talking to Sussana and Neil Nitin Mukesh, who surprises with an excellent portrayal of husband number one. The one-legged Major Edwin Rodriques is suspicious and frightening, and Mukesh controls his sinister expressions and body language with precision.
As is usually the case in Bhardwaj films, the supporting cast makes a great impression. Sussana’s support structure; her maid (Usha Uthup), butler Ghalib (Harish Khanna) and stable hand (Shashi kumar Malviya) deserve special mention. Their loyalty for the suspected murderess reeks of a deep affection, reminding us that there is good and bad in everyone. The trio takes a strange ‘Adam’s familyish’ turn as they begin to enjoy putting the ‘bad’ husbands in their rightful place. In a particularly chilling scene, as Sussana seduces an abusive husband, we see the trio digging his grave in the background. This is just one of many brilliant scenes that director Bhardwaj executes with wicked elan.
http://www.chakpak.com/movie/7-khoon-maaf/reviews/20614
LikeLike
rameshram
February 22, 2011
Utkal Mohanty
I am against “parable” as an interpretation , because the film is very firmly anchored in real time.
through it (nuclear tests, babari masjid..etc)very tangible real life events happen indicating not only a passage of time but also a firm anchor in reality.
I also think “parable” is too pat an explanation for the events in the film.It’s more challenging to think of Saath Khoon Maaf as one of those real life events that are stranger than fiction. the world is full of them. there’s a dude called scott peterson in michigan (or somewhere) who, in plain sight of the police and others has just embarked on his third twenty year old wife (he’s upwards of sixty) the other two dying in suspicious circumstances.
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 23, 2011
@rameshram: I concede the narrative holds on a real plane. But still I think it is a in a world on the border of real and surreal that it makes most sense.
The Michigan example is fine. There are many more to be found if the protagonist is a man ( Why the film itself shows the example of Blue Beard.) With a woman it is possible, but unlikely. That is why I prefer to read it as wish-fulfillment, a black comedic inversion, and to some extent a parable…albeit a parable that does not negate the laws of the real world.
LikeLike
rameshram
February 23, 2011
“With a woman it is possible, but unlikely.”
Oh not true at all! the term “black widow” was coined for a genre of women in literature inspired by this real life example.
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 23, 2011
@Ramesharm, I found this real life inspiration for Blue Besrd : “Although best known as a folktale, the character of Bluebeard appears to derive from legends related to historical individuals in Brittany. One source is believed to have been the 15th-century Breton nobleman and later self-confessed serial killer, Gilles de Rais.”
But none for Black Widow.Can you help?
LikeLike
Sid
February 24, 2011
My thoughts:
http://morethanfilms.blogspot.com/2011/02/7-thoughts-on-7-khoon-maaf.html
LikeLike
Rahul
February 24, 2011
Utkal has inspired me to interpret this movie in a subaltern Marxist /Leninist/Feminist kind of way.
The husbands are actually the symbols of capitalism and nationalism. It is perhaps redundant to point out that one of them is a serving officer in the army , another is spying for his country and yet another is the keeper of the law of the land. Even a casual student of History will tell you that it is written in terms of the heroics of men – for eg. – there are stories of one legged men who were awarded medals of gallantry but the fact that their spouses have carried out the arguably equally challenging task of bringing up the family has hardly merited a footnote. That those one legged men may have been carnally dysfunctional elevates the importance of telling the hitherto unsung story of their wives to unimaginable heights.
The husband, viewed in this way , is the symbol of nationalism and capitalism. He is the Hosne Mubarak , Muammar Gaddafi , Pervez Musharraf!
The Marxist idea of the class divide is also infinitely pertinent in the context of this movie. There are two “others”, one is the feminine other and the second is the proletariat.
This movie can be seen as a call to both “others” who have been systematically oppressed through ages by a coalition of the capitalist and nationalist class should join hands with each other and show it to the man. It is not accidental that Susanna has forged and alliance with the servants – but I believe this to be a Marxist Feminist statement made by this movie.
The character of Wasiullah is a metaphor to expose yet another charade of man, that of Urdu romantic poetry. In the same way that Wasiullah is a kinky bastard by night and romantic poet by day, Urdu poetry is nothing but misogyny of the highest order! The female is supposed to conform to the classic notion of beauty and character and if they dare to step out of it, the Wasiullahs will rip them apart in the dark!
LikeLike
bran1gan
February 24, 2011
utkal: rameshram isn’t referring to a specific character but to the spider (believed to eat its mate after mating) which has lent its name to women who behave similarly. Bob Rafelson made a movie along these lines.
LikeLike
rameshram
February 24, 2011
Rahul,
I think you may have missed one trick here.
Susanna of the title is bharat mata, and while she willingly embraces all…uh…comers, they loot, pillage and generally treat her badly, for which they must die….DIE!!!!!(why won’t you die, dammit!) but she never loses faith (almost an oedipal faith) in her sons…uh…lovers, and hopes the next one will be the real thang.
look! the christian was a soldier(just like the east india company soldier) the muslim was seductive but really bad for bharat mata, whom he tore asunder…..ok im not goin’ there. the bengali gave her the drug of the bhadralok and tried to put her to sleep and then loot her(RAJA SENNNNNNN!!!!!!!) ok I dont remember the other husbands, but they were equally evil sons/lovers of mother India I’m sure!
and in the end, mother india dances with jejus. and wait until you find out what HE has in store for her (TA DA!!!!!)
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 24, 2011
@br: “rameshram isn’t referring to a specific character but to the spider (believed to eat its mate after mating) which has lent its name to women who behave similarly. Bob Rafelson made a movie along these lines.”
That is precisely my point. A spider maybe, but no real woman. In case of women, there aren’t any real life examples. In case of men, starting from Scott Peterson of Michigan to Mr Natwarlal to Charles Sobhraj, there can be plenty of examples found.
@Rahul, I like your interpretation, but I don’t know if the Marxist spin is needed. The film definitely is questioning all the aspects of masculinity that is usually celebrated. Your observation about the hidden misogyny in Urdu poetry is really insightful and can lead to very interesting discussions. And the way it has been brought out through the character of Irrfan is masterly.
LikeLike
rameshram
February 24, 2011
http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_17417685?nclick_check=1
http://www.wbtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=13983390
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
February 24, 2011
Good work Rameshram. I stand corrected.
Which, in a way, makes the film work better . Because I have always thought of it as set on the borderline of real and the surreal. Meaning that what happens in the film is POSSIBLE in real life, but offers interpretations beyond the surface reality. At least, that’s how I prefer to read it.
LikeLike
PK
February 24, 2011
It was interesting to read the review and I do agree that this movie was a misfire but nevertheless a step in the right direction. After all these interpretation/opinions I am curios if anyone one pointed to the possibility that the seven “items” in the movie could literally be related to the seven cardinal sins (biblical list) ?.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_deadly_sins
* A proud look.
* A lying tongue.
* Hands that shed innocent blood.
* A heart that devises wicked plots.
* Feet that are swift to run into mischief.
* A deceitful witness that uttereth lies.
* Him that soweth discord among brethren
I think if someone tries hard they might be able to do the (un?)interesting exercise of linking each of the husbands to a sin ? Its as if Suzanne is married to a sin and then she repents (rings the bell/prays) and then kills her husband thereby getting rid of the sin ? I don’t know if this theory holds good but my favorite appears to be the last one
“Him that soweth discord among brethren” <– I personally did not see this coming (and loved the “drink his blood” bit).
What piked my interest in this idea (other than the movie title) is when at the end Susanne is behind a confession chamber seeing the audience asking for “our” forgiveness.
I am sold to the idea of this film being a parable and that very well could be this films intrinsic weakness and of course that its a tad bit self indulgent. Overall I found this movie to be a satisfying experience esp. the use of background score kept my interest levels high. In addition the humor was subtle, dark and absurdly funny (the Russian on the tiger head , keemat lal with his yellow doll, John as Axl Rose wannabe – hilarious in my eyes !).
Baradwaj is definitely one of the most interesting filmmakers in India and I am eagerly looking forward to his future films however imperfect they maybe.
LikeLike
shafeeq valanchery
February 25, 2011
I have the very opposite conclusions. Susanna is not the Bharat Mata, but that the death of which will keep alive the Indian state. Susanna is the undoer of the Indian state. I have argued this out in detail here:
http://deadletterhouse.blogspot.com/2011/02/many-deaths-in-7-khoon-maaf.html
LikeLike
shafeeq valanchery
February 25, 2011
Very different review.
I have tried out a different set of arguments. I have tried to read each husband as representing a particular phase in the history of India. And that explains why Susanna had to kill – in very random ways.
please check this out and comment:
http://deadletterhouse.blogspot.com/2011/02/many-deaths-in-7-khoon-maaf.html
Thanks
LikeLike
Cookie Naidu
February 26, 2011
Talking about allusions – did you get the black widow spider that scoots out just when the narrator is in a ‘should I ? shouldnt I?” clinch with Susannah. The sight of it reminds him of how perilously close he is to being devoured. He snaps out of it and crushes the spider(and his weakness for her)
LikeLike
rameshram
February 26, 2011
but did he really get away? remember his wife says”…I’ll kill you…” so was it merely a case of frying pan-fire? hmm? (in deep thought)
LikeLike
Prasad Kulkarni
February 27, 2011
7th Murder in 7 Khoon maaf:
Yes i was quite naive enough to quickly term Aunt Maggie’s murder as the 7th one. This was with a winning grin over my friends group when we were having a heated discussion on what was the 7th one.
But when i watched the film again, now i think it cant be that simple. It can be either she married Jesus, inspite of all her sins and history and that itself was a murder of God. Also when in the last song she dances with god it can symbolise her been one with the divine, a suicide like stuff which again is a sin and a murder per se.
Also now when i read regarding the communion it also appeals to me and also must have been the same case with VB as he seems to be an wellread/intelligent director. This seems to be the case as when Arun asks Susanna if she wud murder her 7th husband too, and she replies that he is already dead, and now this time she will drink his blood. It was an indication that Jesus is the 7th husband and 7th death/murder. Kudos!
p.s : Yes the Review was indeed a good one!
LikeLike
Vikram K Singh
March 1, 2011
7 Khoon Maaf worked for me. This is not a film which can be understood with a linear interpretation. This is surprising that film critics did not like the film. This is more surprising to see you, Mr Bhardwaj Rangan, not getting the film in its right perspective. This is surprising in your case because normally you take a different route than other film critics but this time, perhaps you were not watching this film with an open mind.
IICRC, you had gone to a great length in searching meanings in a meaningless film Raavan but this time you turn your back to a meaningfull film which provides a lots of meanings.
Perhaps you would change your opinion after watching it once more on DVD. :).
Please let people know of your second opinion after giving an attentive second watching on DVD.
I read a lot of articles on 7 KM. I found that following hindi article does a justice to the film.
Perhaps you would change your opinion after watching it once more on DVD. 🙂
http://www.cinemanthan.info/index.php/2011/02/7khoonmaafthefilm/
LikeLike
rameshram
March 1, 2011
The other angle to the film is, you can see it as vishal bharadwaj’s noir take on au hazard baltazar of robert bresson.
The heroine herself is an inert murderous entity (like a snake in its own little snake-uh..anthill) the events that happen to her as subject reflect more on the perpetrators of the event than they do on her, the donkey(to keep the analogy alive)
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
March 2, 2011
Vikram Singh, thanks for the link to CineManthan. The Hindi review was the most sensible review of the film I have read so far. Basically I have lost all respect for Indian film reviewers after reading their reviews of 7 Khoon Maaf. I was shaking my head in disbelief as I read about ‘ linear narration’, ‘ predictable’ and other sch judgments. There was so much happening in the film, so much to think and write about, and not one critic got it! Except this Hindi writer who right away got wise to the fact that it is not meant to be a murder mystery or a suspense thriller. Even this much most English language critics did not get. Depressing.
LikeLike
Vikram K Singh
March 7, 2011
One more article shedding some more light on the film :-
7 Khoon Maaf : Catch her if you can
http://www.cinemanthan.info/index.php/2011/03/7khoonmaafreview/
LikeLike
Janice
June 15, 2011
i dont think it was intended to be a serious realistic film. I think it would be a great piece to adapt as a Broadway musical. I found it quite entertaining even though some more toning down in scenes for contrast to the colorful fantasy (a la Gabriel Garcia Marquez) would have been appreciated. Would recommend.
LikeLike