There’s something odd about gangsters with a six pack. How do they maintain it if they’re on the run from the police? Do they simply hide out at the nearest Talwalkar’s, doing bench presses as a henchman holds a gun to a trainer’s temple? And from where do they derive protein? Surely not from the booze and the greasy legs of chicken at the upscale restaurants they always seem to duck into, the kind where a Priyanka Chopra or a Sunny Leone is always around to perform an item number? It’s impossible not to have these thoughts seeing John Abraham play Manya Surve in Sanjay Gupta’s Shootout at Wadala, which is set in the late 1970s and the early 1980s, a time when a gym meant a skipping rope and a set of barbells. It’s impossible not to have these thoughts because Abraham’s body is stretched across the screen at every opportunity, and because if you didn’t look at that body, you’d be forced to concentrate on his rhetoric. Imagine The Incredible Hulk quoting Yeats and you’ll know what I mean.
It doesn’t help that Manoj Bajpai is at hand to show exactly how this rhetoric should be delivered. The film is about Mumbai police’s first registered encounter, which resulted in Surve’s death, and Bajpai plays a rival gangster, Zubair Haskar, who sometimes works with the police. When a cop asks him to clean up the city, he smiles and says, “Jis safai ki baat aap kar rahe ho, usey sadkon mein sabun ka pani nahin, khoon bahega.” This is pulp prose at its most purple, and Bajpai delivers it in a matter-of-fact manner. He knows that the line is already laced with gunpowder – there’s no need for him to blow up as well. Abraham, on the other hand, sweats and strains and growls each utterance through a hoarse throat, as if afraid of not being heard by the audience member in the last row. It’s hard to take him seriously, and the film never becomes anything more than a proficiently made cops-and-robbers thriller.
That, in itself, is not a bad reason for a movie to exist, especially given Gupta’s penchant for staging stylish mayhem, but I expected more texture, more emotional grandeur – after all, these are real-life events (adapted from the account by S Hussain Zaidi, Dongri to Dubai). When we see Deewar, we see it as the story of a man first, a gangster only later. He doesn’t just carry around guns but also scars. Surve, here, is shown to be sinned against, at first, but he’s hardly allowed moments of introspection – not when there’s another juicy line of dialogue to be delivered, anticipating whistles and applause. We feel nothing for him. It’s harder to buy Tusshar Kapoor as a gangster, when he seems content clowning round. (Sample line as he enters a kotha: “Main woh Bruce hoon jo aath saal se lee nahin.”) Anil Kapoor chips in with his characteristic intensity, and the film’s strangest sight is its imagining of Kangna Ranaut as Rekha. The resemblance is uncanny. Then she opens her mouth and shrieks, and the illusion is gone.
Copyright ©2013 Baradwaj Rangan. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
dee
May 4, 2013
This seems to be your second review after Commando where you seem amused/confused about brawny leading men and the lack of realism in their looks.
My question is – why should these leading men look realistic anyway? Why do we never bring realism into question when it comes to leading women – after all, the kind of bodies they have require them to “work” at it as much as the men do – if not more. Normal women hardly look like that either. It could be argued that they represent male fantasy – in that case why should female fantasy be forced to fetter itself to the boundaries of realism?
(No questions about JA’s underdeveloped acting muscle though 😀 )
LikeLike
Seema
May 5, 2013
@dee,
Realism is very much required to play a part the way the movie demands.. Else how will the audience relate to the characters? Actors are required to deliver the story/plot of the movie & not hope that the director will some how have to use only words/dialogues to unravel things.. Probably here is that the hero of the movie (though a villain), John Abraham is mostly all brawn & little acting and hence he has to cash-in on that to deliver the box office results else he’ll be out of favour. He surely can’t act except for tiny movement of few facial muscles to display his variant of angst or a smile.
Look at Manoj Bajpayee on the other hand! Little needs to be said.. He just does it right. Be it Gangs of Wasseypur or Special 26 or SAW now!
LikeLike
brangan
May 5, 2013
Dee: I was being facetious in the “Commando” review, not complaining about the lack of realism, and if you recall, I said that the reason he was cast was precisely those muscles. But here, in a drama supposedly inspired from real life, the look-what-a-great-gym-body-I-have school of acting looks plain silly. What’s more, this type of body doesn’t even belong in that era. Not that realism is a huge deal, but I guess if the actor did well, this wouldn’t be such a problem, but here it’s all about that body.
LikeLike
Harshil
May 5, 2013
mr.rangan, i bow to thee….ur reviews are just pure fun to read. i was wondering about john’s muscles but ur description of the origins of the six pack killed it man. amazing….and ya im not gonna watch it for sure. 🙂
LikeLike
Dr Van Nostrand
May 5, 2013
Which Sanjay Gupta is this- the hack plagiarist who made Aatish and Kaaten or the other guy.I dont know much about the other guy but I like him if only he is the other guy!
To be fair , lots of blue collar guys in India have six packs of sorts. But due to the relative lack of protein due to poor nutrition they tend to ectomorphs(lean muscle) rather mesomorph(brawny like Mr Abraham)
Manya Surve being from a vendor and laborer background couldve been rather lean and cut.However yes,it is very doubtful he had the brawn,height and features of Abraham.
The reason movies like Satya,Ardh Satya,Nayakan,Aranya Kandam just from the top of my head work is due to the characters therein looking sweaty,snarly and not very pretty.Of course not ugly ,I mean it IS a visual medium. But THIS is ridiculous.
As far as Manya Surve movies are concerned, I am plenty satisfied with the original Agneepath by Mukul Anand,also a plagiarist,but he was atleast talented!
This is based on Hussain Zaidi’s work?! the same guy whose work was the basis for Black Friday! He must be rolling in his grave-that is if he were dead :p.
Wow, how can you manage to squander a movie on Surve, with material from Zaidi, starring Bajpai. Well they did and that’s not entirely JA’s fault.
LikeLike
Aurora Vampiris
May 6, 2013
Yes. Yes. I get that the acting isn’t decent. It’s John Abraham.
But seriously, isn’t this an action film? How was the ACTION? The staging, the choreography and so on and so forth? Was it even good? Decent? Or are Hindi action movies so bad these days that the action set-pieces aren’t even worth talking about?
Honestly though, I think this is part of a larger mystery – Mr. Rangan, do you even LIKE action films? I’m not even talking films Die Hard and Lethal Weapon, where there’s (are) a character arc(s) of sorts (okay… maybe that’s a bit of a stretch); I’m talking The Raid: Redemption, or Dredd. Do you like such films – the sole purpose of which is titillation of sheer masculine, adrenaline-charged fancy?
LikeLike
brangan
May 6, 2013
Aurora Vampiris: “especially given Gupta’s penchant for staging stylish mayhem”
In other words, I thought the action was stylishly staged. I didn’t think there was anything more to be said.
LikeLike
chhote saab
May 7, 2013
I had the same question when I had seen the previews – why was John Abraham cast in this role with his chiseled physique, till I read on Wikipedia that Manya Surve had won some body-building contest , I guess before he became a well-known gangster. He won the title of ‘Mumbai Shri’ – so that gave them the license to flaunt John Abraham’s 6 packs !
LikeLike
Rahul
May 7, 2013
, “but I expected more texture, more emotional grandeur – after all, these are real-life events”
Hmmmmmm. I had the same problem with Argo , and you said it was a genre movie. 🙂 Shootout at Wadala is an out and out genre film if ever there was one. Expecting emotional heft in a movie like this is, in my book, similar to expecting a a love story. in a Fast and Furious movie,
The real Manya Surves brother was a famous bodybuilder, so that’s that.
About JA’s acting – I agree he does not have the chops of Amitabh of Deewar , or even Sunny Deol of Ghayal. But this is not that movie , in my humble opinion. Heck, I do not think there was even a single romantic song. Also, notice how conveniently Surve says he never went back to his mom, knowing she will never forgive her. This is a guys night out film. The target audience does not want to see rona dhona or the dinner table scene of Agneepath -better put another item number.instead of all that crap.
LikeLike
brangan
May 7, 2013
Rahul: Haha. You got me there. But I guess expectations of emotion in a bio-pic kinda movie aren’t unwarranted, whereas with “Argo” it’s the case of a thriller, where the dominant mood is suspense/tension. I guess you looked at it as an action movie, plain and simple, while I looked at it as a bio-pic, given the taken-from-true-life origins and all.
I like your phrase “guys night out film.” I wish I’d used it. 🙂
LikeLike
NulPointer
May 7, 2013
Unrelated ,but apparently a machine can tell you if the script is great or not Formula for a hit movie
LikeLike