WIN SOME, LOSE SOME
Reasons to look forward to new Hindi-indie movies… and reasons to be wary.
JUL 26, 2009 – THE PLACE OF DISREPUTE IS NAMED LA LA LODGE, and its disreputability is accented, at the doorstep, by a wash of lurid red light. A car zooms past – and beyond the eye of the camera – and then we hear the screech of brakes. A split second later, the vehicle backs up. We cut to a chauffeur tucking his cap under an arm and extending the other hand to knock, when the doors open, as if on their own. A customer exits with a whistle, tucking his belt into its last loopholes, leaving us in little doubt about why the belt was unbuckled in the first place. Like a courteous usher at a performance hall, he motions the chauffeur inside. The latter enters and faces a brightly painted woman who exhales wearily, hands on hips, features betraying irritation. “Haven’t I told you not to disturb me during business hours?”
A wide shot draws us to a shocking pink sari draped carelessly on the bed, as if she wanted to minimise even the time spent between dressing and undressing. She stands simply in a shiny blue blouse and an equally shiny petticoat, again a shocking pink. The chauffeur meekly replies, “Sorry, Gulbadan.” If she’s mollified, she doesn’t show it. Businesslike as ever, she commands him to button her blouse, and as he positions himself behind her, she begins to repair her makeup. The mirror in front is cracked, and while her reflection is clear as crystal, his (taller) image is a smoky smudge. Bending down and buttoning her up, he reveals the reason he backed up to the lodge. He has a Mercedes at his disposal, and he wonders if she’d like to go for a spin. She finally cracks a smile and slaps him affectionately on the cheek.
This stretch of screen time is filled, at once, with nothing and everything. Nothing significant has occurred in terms of plot or narrative motion, save for establishing that this man and this woman are lovers. But the detailing is everything – a little cosmos of a life lived in the fringes. Had this been a mainstream movie, the prostitute would have had a body to match Shilpa Shetty’s. But as Gulbadan bends forward to face the mirror, she reveals heavy hips – and the blemished mirror is itself a giveaway that this isn’t mainstream territory, where such a prop would have been spit-shined till a second before the director yelled “Action!” Everything about this wonderfully offhand sequence – though there’s nothing offhand about the meticulousness with which it’s been put together – is the reason I’ve come to look forward to the new Hindi-indie releases.
As for the reason I’ve become wary of new Hindi-indie releases, I offer the rest of Pankaj Advani’s Sankat City. By no stretch of the imagination is this anywhere close to a bad movie – but it tries so hard, so very hard, to be The Great Indian Absurdist Comedy that you’re reminded of the smug overachiever who sat in the first bench at class. After a point, you stop admiring his cleverness – you just want to smack him on the head and ask him to stop showing off. It’s not enough that a fraud-godman in a tub gets a male assistant in a pink towel to bathe him, there’s also someone so fond of fish, he imagines a potential girlfriend as a mermaid – every eccentric scene is so stuffed with eccentric dialogue and eccentric characters filled with eccentric quirks, you soon begin to yearn for respite from the wall-to-wall lunacy.
By the time a trickster duo poses as bomb-squad experts in order to get at a couple of crores in cash – the plot is about the revolving-door pursuit of ill-gotten money – I began to feel like I was strapped to my chair with an industrial-size funnel stuck down my gullet as a vat of “Whimsy: Extra Strength” was being tipped over. Perhaps a second viewing will allow me to better appreciate individual segments in isolation – because a lot of the plotting is indeed ingenious – but for now, the only contributor I came away with awe for is Manoj Pahwa, who’s outrageously entertaining as a small-time producer who dreams of building a Hollywood-style studio. This is the kind of bone-dry comedy where a hero who’s had a string of flops exclaims, “Is film ke baad, I’m going to be back with a bang. Boom!” A couple of scenes later, he’s dynamited.
Pahwa subsequently reports from the hospital that nothing much was left of his hero, “Aadhi khopdi, kuch ungliyan shungliyan…” Blackness in humour is no longer news in our multiplex cinema, but there are several such lines in Sankat City that raise tastelessness to delicious new levels. This is also the kind of film that stresses that we are in the age of multiplex cinema, and that the kind of films Pahwa makes (Gun Master Gagan) are no longer in vogue – and yet, there are qualmless borrowings from old-Bollywood staples like memory loss and lost-and-found siblings. A lot of Sankat City reminded me of Tashan – in spirit only; the two are poles apart in terms of sensibility – where the team appears to have had more fun tossing around zany ideas during scripting than while shooting. It’s all terribly clever – and also terribly exhausting.
Copyright ©2009 The New Sunday Express. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Swapnila
July 26, 2009
I quote Tarantino- “I respect criticism. But I know more about film than most of the people writing about me. Not only that, I’m a better writer than most of the people writing about me. And I can write film criticism better than most of the people writing about me too.”
Filmmaking is a journey through uncharted territory. Every project has its own character, it is a unique organism that lives in its own world. You must feel your way around, explore the human soul, collaborate, and when lost, muddle through. The script is the instrument with which you chart your course. The stars lead you on your never-ending quest of exploration.
The director makes the morsel that others like to bite into. It is impossible to cater to the diverse taste of billions of people. What one hails as class could be termed crass by another. Or like someone rightly said- “ One country’s terrorist is another country’s hero”.
I watched Sankat City twice. Once with my entire office and the other time with my family members. We were unanimous in our opinion. It’s a movie worth applauding. I’ll give you very small examples. When Fillip Fattu says- ‘Condom pocket mein le kar ghoomta hai pan who kehti hai sex shaadi ke baad ich manayega’. This coming from a woman who sells her body each night to nameless faces. And to a man whose love is exemplary. Who eventually hired a supari killer to get rid of his & his lover’s tormentor. WOW. Suleiman Supari saying-‘ Fillip, Gogi aur Pachisia ki request thi ki phone kar ke maarna’. Guru dreaming of Mona as a mermaid ( given his intense love for fishes and the mermaid being a fabled, legendary creature with magical and prophetic powers ). Sri Lanka ki hogi Sir, Pachisia ( in a towel ) applauding the bomb squad, life is soooooo beautiful.. bahut miss karoonga, the garbage dump scene, the lecherous swami, main fataafat pee loonga, the rapidex english speaking course book and poster of ‘gone in 60 seconds’ in Guru’s kholi, the B Grade movie posters in Gogi’s office, the match box posters in the bathroom, jhaanse ki rani, kangaal bank of India, machli jal ki raani hai etc etc. I could go on and on. My ordinary mind can’t even begin to imagine how Pankaj must’ve woven all those characters together and plausibly so. And bring them all together to their justifiable end. The casting was superb, except maybe for Chunky Pandey who was mildly irriatting as Sheshaiyya/ Sheshnaag!!! This was a movie which didn’t try to be like any other movie. Which stood its ground and stood so well.
Autopsies will happen. We should let them happen.
Critics are like eunuchs in a harem: they know how it’s done, they’ve seen it done every day, but they’re unable to do it themselves.
– Brendan Behan
LikeLike
Anand
July 26, 2009
BR: “but there are several such lines in Sankat City that raise tastelessness to delicious new levels” :-)) – This is why I look forward to your columns!!
And I really liked the first comment by Swapnila indirectly or directly calling you an eunuch in a harem!! The fact that it was the first comment says so much about the credibility of the opinion!!
LikeLike
raj
July 26, 2009
I’m tempted to take up cudgels with Swapnil but given that I finally caught BR not buying into the self-propelling hype of a “new-age” bollywood blah blah, I am just going to sit back and revel 🙂
LikeLike
Azad
July 26, 2009
Nice post.. I too felt disappointed and tired by the end.. It had a few momnets that captivated me, but rest of the movie looked tiring..
LikeLike
Varun
July 26, 2009
BR: A second viewing may help, and some of the eccentricities may start looking ‘incidental’ to the plot of a city going mad. Cheesy and kitschy-trivia-humor (Gun Master Gagan) has rarely been so convincingly used in a filmy context (Our ads are now-a-days full of it though, and how incompetently!)…for me it was like a skid-row version of Hrishi-da comedies…all eccentrics and lots of plain-talking.
And I agree, the bomb-squad sequence was unintentionally bad, and so was all of Chunky Pandey (in double-avatars) but these were surely minor indulgences in an otherwise brilliant piece of collapsible-screenplay – all arms and screws in the right place.
Trivia – (The actress playing) Gulbadan herself was part of a TV commercial celebrating kitsch – the almost-cult Zee Cinema ad with Vijay Raaz as the school-teacher and she as lady Dacoit.
LikeLike
hariohm
July 27, 2009
Oh, how I thought after seeing the topic ‘win some, lose some’ that you are going to write about ‘my cousin vinny’.
LikeLike
VJ
July 28, 2009
Well this reminds me of Mumbhai Express ..ingeniously scripted but was trying too hard and in the end quite exhausting .
LikeLike
Venkatesh
August 1, 2009
Damn , i am about to see the film , my expectations are now diminished and i was so looking forward to “A Film By the Director of the Legendary/Mythical Urff Professor”.
LikeLike