An insect goes about avenging itself on its human killer in the year’s most imaginative mainstream movie.
Sometimes, watching a hugely hyped film a few days after its opening weekend can be helpful. The excitement that you’re among the first few people – okay, thousands of people, considering that these big movies are almost always ultra-wide releases – watching the film on its first day of release is not there anymore, and you don’t feel you’re part of a pre-programmed cultural event. You feel you’re just watching a movie. Even so, The Dark Knight Rises was disappointing. Too long. Too consumed by a sense of its of-the-moment importance. Too many characters who promise much and deliver little. Too desperate to be anointed a masterpiece. It became better as it got along, but not all that much, and by the end, I was thankful that the director Christopher Nolan was done with his Batman trilogy. Now he’ll hopefully go back to doing the small-scale puzzle-box dramas he’s best at – films like Memento, Insomnia, and especially The Prestige, which is easily his masterpiece, a crafty little gem that yields more pleasurable facets with each viewing.
For a more engrossing comic-book saga, I had to turn to a somewhat unexpected source. Listen to the storyline of Eega, the Telugu film dubbed in Tamil as Naan Ee, and you want to laugh: a man dies, is reborn as a housefly, and avenges his untimely death at the hands of the villain. Actually, the storyline is fine. We’ve seen many reincarnation dramas where someone is reborn as someone else – Raj Kiran becoming Rishi Kapoor in Karz, or Kamal Haasan opting to retain his form, thank you very much, in the remake Enakkul Oruvan. These were stories about men reborn as men, and these reborn men were played by actors whose faces let us see what they were thinking and feeling. We could hear them speak. We could see them do things. But here, in what appears at first to be an act of monumental hubris or foolhardiness (or perhaps both), the director SS Rajamouli transforms his protagonist to a housefly. What can it do except buzz around?
But they pull it off. Naan Ee (which is the version I watched, in a full house) is the most insanely inventive movie of the year – perhaps of several years. Without a protagonist (or I should say, without a human protagonist), and with only a villain and a heroine, we are led through a story that’s funny, sentimental, action-packed, romantic – there’s even a bit of the occult thrown in. If I had to be picky and really, really mean-spirited, I’d say that the special effects could have been a bit better, that the fly could have been more convincingly animated – but I’m not even going to go there. When a film so audaciously and convincingly earns the audience’s suspension of disbelief, you don’t go picking holes about the small things that don’t work as well as they could have. You rejoice at the big things that are brought off so beautifully.
The story could be loosely described as deriving from the Ghost template (the hero-as-ghost there becomes, here, the hero-as-housefly; there’s also the pining heroine), but to harp on that similarity would be to accuse every doomed love story as harking back to Romeo and Juliet. The story has been around forever. It’s the touches Rajamouli imparts to it that make all the difference, right from the opening credits where, over a black screen, we hear a child pestering her father for a bedtime story. He’s tired, and he begins narrating a half-hearted “once upon a time there was a king” story, but the child – a stand-in for the audience that’s heard and seen too many of these “once upon a time” stories – demands something different. And the father, a stand-in for the director, begins his “once upon a time there was a fly” story. The child perks up. So does the audience.
The film is full of sprightly touches, like the heroine being a specialist in miniature art. This unique talent, which comes off at first as a gimmick, becomes crucial to the narrative later on, as she equips her housefly-lover with armour capable of withstanding the infinitely larger villain’s attacks. Rajamouli doesn’t humanise the housefly, the way we see in the Disney animated movies. It has no facial features, no voice, few anthropomorphic quirks, no superpowers – most of the time, we seem to be watching some kind of heightened silent movie. Let’s not dwell on how an insect comes to possess a human vocabulary of emotions and language. In a comic-book universe, this question is redundant. What matters is that the “hero” extracts his vengeance solely through fly-like means, and that, by the end, we root with gladiatorial lust for him (it?) to win. Forget bats, when was the last time you cheered on a bug?
An edited version of this piece can be found here.
Copyright ©2012 The Hindu. This article may not be reproduced in its entirety without permission. A link to this URL, instead, would be appreciated.
Arjun
July 29, 2012
Noooo…lets not forget the bats yet..!! please tell me there is a full length review on TDKR coming up….
LikeLike
Anurag
July 29, 2012
Thank you Brangan. I was wondering when u were gonna watch it. Let me tell u i do not understand telugu neither a word of tamil but I just finished watching this masterpiece 3 times in theatres and since ur review was still not out, i always wondered if this is one of those films extremely good for masses and outright non-existent for the critics…well genuine critics like you to be precise. But thankfully this film tuns out to be equal pleaser for masses as well as critics which is a big deal in today’s times when films on the borderline (edge) are desperately trying to hit the mark.
Speaking of disney, as also similarly pointed by you, for me the film was more into the category of Pixar’s WallE in which, eyes , eyebrows and eyelids are totally non-existent and yet using the overall body gesture of the creature, the filmmaker is able to pull it off so effectively, so much that in some scenes it almost makes the eyes moist. Thats the sole reason there is no complain to be made for the ‘still could have been better animation’. It also reminds me of the PIXAR short ‘Tin toy’ in which everything is shown from the tiny toy’s perspective and even a toddler seems like a monster to the toy. What I like most was that Eega did not follow the cliched timeline of reincarnation films in which we need to tolerate first hero till interval when he wud die, followed by his reincarnated version in second half. It is very brave to bring the tiny equivalent of this film’s rajnikant so early on in the film and keeping the villain as the sole human driving force of the rest of the time.
My only tiny grouse, other than the bit to loud score(which seems ok ish imagining the insecurity of filmmakers for a ‘silent insect driven’ film) is that since I have seen Magadheera as well, why does, may be telugu cinema in general give some much importance to superstition / saint sequences- isnt that a bit regressive especially when one is making so much of a CG driven film in modern times? Agreed that the concept itself is fiction however those saint worship sequences are the only things that make one feel a bit awkward while watching a film that is narrated to perfection. Overall, extremely enjoyed – a film of true repeat value. Kudos to Rajamouli for making a truly international cinema.
LikeLike
Anurag
July 29, 2012
Offtopic but allow me this for TDK. Brangan Quote: “The Dark Knight Rises was disappointing. Too long. Too consumed by a sense of its of-the-moment importance. Too many characters who promise much and deliver little. Too desperate to be anointed a masterpiece. It became better as it got along, but not all that much, and by the end, I was thankful that the director Christopher Nolan was done with his Batman trilogy.”
Completely Agree to that Rangan. Finally there is someone who agrees with me that this films is not as good as the world is making it out to be. I was severly disappointed while everyone else in my friends group pretended to move with the herd. Particuarly i did not like the inclusion of inception actors and seems that rises plot was tailor made around these actors instead of characters – a cheap mainstream practice not expected out of someone as sophisticated as nolan.
LikeLike
shravan dharmaraj
July 29, 2012
Hi baradwajan rangan…i guess its also important for you to state that naan ee is not a dubbed film. Its a movie made simultaneously in tamil. Lets give them the right credits:)
LikeLike
Rohit Ramachandran
July 29, 2012
Good review. I’m of the same opinion. On Naan Ee, that is. The Dark Knight Rises, on the other hand, was philosophy class to me.
LikeLike
ram
July 29, 2012
ya baddy, i too felt the same on tdkr. “Too many characters who promise much and deliver little.”..
good heaven, its the end of the triology
LikeLike
thundadome21
July 29, 2012
you know you could have just stated your review of The Dark Knight Rises instead of waiting insecurely for someone else to confirm to your views, and calling others sheep simply for sharing views of a majority/minority. Ironically you display the herd mentality yourself……
LikeLike
Pranav
July 29, 2012
Are you sure, you meant Insomnia? That was the only cinema he did not write and I did not find it good at all. As for the Prestige but for one last “true magic” moment, which comes as a damper for me I would not have a problem accepting it as his master piece. Even if Inception equally has one major flaw in logic, I would still like to go with it as it sets a new benchmark of Cinematic Intelligence for a filmmaker(writer & director).
LikeLike
vijay
July 30, 2012
This Rajamouli guy has some 10 hits in a row or something like that in Telugu and quite a few of those being critically acclaimed as well.Wish he did a straight one in Tamil the next time around
LikeLike
Ravi K
July 30, 2012
Alternate title: Maggot-dheera
I loved this film. I saw Eega, and while I don’t know much Telugu, that was not a hindrance to enjoying it. Incredibly inventive and entertaining. Let’s not forget about Sudeep, who played the frustrated villain with the perfect blend of menace and humor.
LikeLike
brangan
July 30, 2012
Arjun: I don’t think so. It was way too generic for me to summon up the enthu to write something just for the blog… though I enjoyed the last 20 mins or so.
shravan dharmaraj: There were a few moments where the lip movements seemed to be in Telugu. Maybe they shot most of it in Telugu and redid just a few scenes in Tamil? Because even a few street signs were in Telugu…
LikeLike
Anurag
July 30, 2012
Could be True. I just realised that. But my intention was not to wait for just any ‘someone’, but someone who is expert in giving opinion on films, someone whose points i have always believed in. The ones i am calling herd on the other hand are neither opinionated nor any of them care for the reasoning by other critics. All they care for is how many stars the film got by majority of other critics which sometimes makes me think may be my understanding of cinema is wrong. The frustration comes out like this here. My apologies if that came across as offensive anyway.
LikeLike
Priya Sreeram (@priyasreeram)
July 30, 2012
the review’s got me thoroughly interested- gonna watch this
LikeLike
SrivaS
July 30, 2012
No, Baradwaj: It was shot as a bilingual film with every scene shot first in Telugu and then Tamil with artistes mouthing dialogues in both languages. That’s what I have read in most reports and also in interviews of Rajmouli and Sudeep. But, I did notice that in some scenes there was a lag in lyp sync of dialogues.
Good review, the by the way. I always enjoy your reviewes.
LikeLike
rameshram
July 30, 2012
Missulu andi! NO ega or anu ega for me.
LikeLike
ram
July 30, 2012
ya baddy, the last 30 odd min were very good in tdkr. bad kills evil.. and every man is a and can be a hero.. barathiraja’s bommalattam twist. p.s- i ve not read the batman comics..
LikeLike
Partha
July 30, 2012
Perhaps a critic inherently enjoys smaller movies made on the lesser scale, more than the touted summer blockbuster?. The intricacies of the craft are perhaps, more appealing in smaller scale and more personal movies. Either way, I don’t know why you didnt like the DKR, but to me it brought closure and added a whole new emotional dimension to Batman. I think Chris Nolan, is the reason that summer blockblusters are not assembly liners like Transformers, but intelligent movies that bring in the audience too. Yes, for some people it is that much more cooler to trash a movie, that has been by and large accepted( referring to the comments above, not the review) , but the dark night rises was not that movie!
LikeLike
Anoop K.N. (@anoopkn)
July 30, 2012
Hmm.. Agree that the idea of having an housefly as the protagonist was inventive and risky. And it was an entertaining film, alright. But the fly aside, it was your run of the mill Telugu movie with the ordinary yet unstoppable hero taking down the powerful villain. Even if you leave aside the reincarnation and highly developed brain of the fly, it was still was a corny, cheesy film lacking much logic. Not that I’m having an issue with that. All it promised was fun and it delivered. But I do have issues with comparing it to a film jam packed with great characters and lines, dealing with myriad themes and allegories. And for the record, TDKR wasn’t as good as I thought it would be. But still, there is no comparison.
LikeLike
Mickie
July 30, 2012
Darn. Now I have to watch this.
LikeLike
SrivaS
July 30, 2012
Dear Anoop:
Not that I want to compare TDKR with Naan Ee, but I want to comment on your “no logic” issue. TDKR has so many logical loop holes. These logical holes are especially glaring given Christopher Nolan’s credibility in the past in this area. I am OK with enjoying TDKR despite these, which I did, by the way, the same way I did Naan Ee.
LikeLike
Arjun
July 30, 2012
Baradwaj: oh…that’s sad.We all would have loved to see you dissect and examine TDKR reminiscent of the one u did in “Bat…seriously” on Dark Knight. But am sure it will wriggle its way in on your other articles like it has done in this review. 🙂
LikeLike
Ravi K
July 31, 2012
Anoop, to quote Roger Ebert, “It is not what a film is about, but how it is about it.”
LikeLike
Utkal Mohanty
July 31, 2012
Good to see your glowing review of Eega. As it happens , I passed Dark Night to see eeega, and was pleasantly surprised. The damn thing works. The revenge action, the comedy, the romance ( yes with the fly)… everything.
LikeLike
rahultyagi
July 31, 2012
Ravi K, I thought that is exactly what Anoop was talking about. He found the “what” of the film – “the idea of having an housefly as the protagonist” – good, but thout that “how it is about it” part was run of the mill… It’s not like he said “I haven’t seen the movie, but how can a movie with a fly as a protagonist be any good?”
As for TDK/TDKR, Brangan, they are some of the very few movies where I have never really related to your point of view. I suspect that the negative view might have something to do with the hype? as in “they are so hyped.. they aren’t really THAT good”. But it seems you haven’t liked TDKR at all! (last 30 min! that’s it?). Forget about the logic/intelligence etc, but some of the scenes were just pure thrilling! isn’t that good enough for a good review, assuming a movie succeeds in doing that? Then again, clearly it didn’t even do that for you… Ah, well, at least it didn’t put you off so much that you won’t look forward to his next movie…
LikeLike
Abhirup.
July 31, 2012
Good to see that there are reviewers who actually recognize the mediocrity of ‘The Dark Knight Rises’. I have always wondered about this class of moviegoers, who operate under the assumption “Chris Nolan can do no wrong.” In other words, since the movie is made by nolan, and since it is made on a large scale and is so eagerly anticipated, it MUST be an excellent film. So many people I know of were convinced of that the film is awesome even before they saw it, just because, “It’s nolan, man!”
I completely agree with Mr. Rangan’s opinion on the film. Sure, it has some “thrilling” action sequences, but that alone doesn’t make a film worth watching. There are a whole lot of other things wrong with it, some of which Mr. Rangan has already pointed out. Nolan has made better films. I would much rather watch those than sit through ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ or even ‘The Dark Knight’ ever again. I find both grossly overrated. For my money, ‘Batman Begins’ is a better film than either. And ‘Memento’ and ‘Insomnia’ are individually better than the whole Batman trilogy taken together.
LikeLike
PS
August 1, 2012
(not shouting “COPYING” or something)
The concept of Eega was shown in one of the episodes of the X Files, where a man is executed on the electric chair by the police and he promises revenge, and lo he is re born as a fly … the sequences of revenge were pretty kickass and i distinctly remember that one of all the other episodes… it is funny that it was this episode that got chosen to be remade or the concept was in Rajamouli’s thoughts as well .. but all in all remarkable thought … and it just makes me glad that this thought strikes a chord (and not that I am just an idiot! 🙂 )
LikeLike
Ravi K
August 3, 2012
Rahul Tyagi, I believe it is the how of Eega that makes it interesting. Instead of the usual punch dialogues and whatnot of the typical hero-based films, we have a little CG fly who tries to off the villain in inventive ways. And there is an overall sense of humor, even in the depiction of the villain.
Nobody EVER suspects the butterfly:
😀
LikeLike
Raghu
August 4, 2012
Hey Rangan, you are a critic that I respect. But in my opinion, i would say please don’t go for a review of TDKR, if it was such a dissapointment to you.
I remember your take on the Dark Night, where you were all too eager to find ways in which to trash the movie in whatever inventive ways you can. And for me, it was one of your most pathetic reviews ever , wherein you were like, ” oh..come-on mr.director, i’m so intelligent and so much above the level of rest of the folks…grow up man and gimme something else…”. Sorry to say, but it felt like that and also your some line on Joker’s (Heath Ledger’s) perfomance having sadly gone into an undeserving movie, or something along those lines, was perhaps among the stupidest lines ever from a genuine critic anywhere i the world, that i’ve heard.
Anyway i just said what i felt. BTW, your take on Eega aka Naan ee, was nice.
LikeLike
Rahul Tyagi
August 4, 2012
Ravi K, that’s fine. It is possible that if I ever get to see it, I’ll also agree with what you sait. Right now, I have no opinion either way (since I haven’t seen the movie). I was merely pointing out that your response to Anoop seemed to suggest that he was talking about the “what” of the movie being bad, while he really didn’t seem to like the “how”. That you thought the “how” was good isn’t really relevant to his opinion, is it?
Raghu, why speculate on brangan’s motives? It is certainly not impossible that he fell for “everybody likes it so much, but I’m better than everybody else so I shouldn’t really like it” thing, which most of us fall for once in a while without even realizing it, but surely it is ALSO possible (and, may I say much more likely.. given the care with which he treats most movies in his reviews) that he just simply didn’t like these movies? He is not the same person as you (or me), you know…
LikeLike
Abhirup.
August 4, 2012
Raghu, I think you need to accept the fact that just because you were blown away by ‘The Dark Knight’, the rest of us do not have the obligation to follow suit. Mr. Rangan has every right to criticize a film–including one as “big” as ‘The Dark Knight’–if he doesn’t like it. Using words like “pathetic” and “stupidest” to describe a review, just because you disagreed with it, merely shows that you are immature. Grow up. Please.
LikeLike